The Five Cash Management Initiatives Treasurers Should Consider

|8-2-2017 | Jan Meulendijks | iTreasurer |

 

In October 2014 iTreasurer published an article ‘The Five Cash Management Initiatives Treasurers Should Consider‘ about how treasurers keep focus on ways to keep cash management in their organisation efficient and cost effective.  As this is always an important issue and also relevant in 2017, we asked our expert Jan Meulendijks to comment on the article.

Five initiatives

iTreasurer stated in their article that treasurers should spend their time on five initiatives and that they should be part of a treasurers’ overall budget and resource planning process.

Going beyond SEPA

iTreasurer stated: ‘Initially rolled out as an approach for risk mitigation for commercial payment transactions in Euro, SEPA adopters have found that SEPA, or the Single Euro Payments Area, provides a more efficient way to transfer and collect funds across borders without managing all the different legal payment frameworks of each country. But despite the many bright spots of SEPA, “reconciliation in 2014/2015 was still a challenge,”

According to Jan Meulendijks the development of reconciliation tools has now become an issue for ERP/General ledger software developers and that the banks do not need to focus on it any more. Processing digital account information/account statements are a well established feature of financial software programs and also include the processing of open accounts receivables.

Global Account Rationalization

‘The SEPA initiative has acted as the catalyst for other global projects, with high priority placed on account rationalization. By reducing accounts across Europe, many large US multinational corporations are realizing significant savings in both hard- and soft-dollar costs. “In the SEPA environment, all corporates needed was one account for payments and one account for receivables across the SEPA landscape,’ said Mr. Brieske, Regional Head of Trade Finance and Cash Management Corporates Global Solutions Americas, Global Transaction Banking, Deutsche Bank in the article. At that time keeping every bank happy was  a tough job, if not impossible. Being able to spread the wallet across fewer banks was one of the positive by-products of a bank consolidation.

‘Nowadays it is remarkable to see that “wallet sizing” has turned around completely,’ says Jan Meulendijks. ‘Today it is the companies that determine how much of their wallet will be handled by which bank and the banks no longer have influence on the amount of transactions with a company.’
In-House Bank Structures

Treasurers had  continued to find ways to alleviate the growing cash balances that had become strategically more important to their organizations. Structures like in-house banks (IHBs) were becoming more commonplace as organizations took the next step to further enhance their global liquidity models. The practical considerations for the evolution of the IHB could be directly attributed to global expansion and increased revenue mix overseas in addition to complexities related to time zones, language, growth of regional shared services and decision execution.

The Five Cash Management Initiatives Treasurers Should Consider

Jan Meulendijks states that in the chart of the article the first three steps of “in-house bank progression” are no real in-house bank developments, but treasury-related measures, that now also take place in medium-sized organisations. ‘Only if companies have a real ‘payment factory’, I call it a in-house bank.’
RMB Internationalization

As a result of the ongoing RMB regulatory changes, there had been a significant improvement in the ease of making cross-border RMB payments via China. The RMB was a fairly new currency on the international scene then. The RMB internationalization project had begun to pick up steam over the second half of 2014, with many global MNCs looking to launch new cash management strategies in Asia. New structures were thought to be able to unlock China’s previously “trapped cash” challenge, and optimize their cash held in this part of the world where many opportunities lie for them.

Jan sees a tendency today that the more the deregulation of the RMB progresses the more one can treat it as any other currency. However, this is not achieved yet and Asia will continue to be an region where ‘trapped cash’ occurs on a regular basis.

 Maximizing Excess Cash
According to Martin Runow, Head of Cash Management Corporates Americas, Global Transaction Banking, Deutsche Bank most MNCs then were still very risk-averse and focused on principal preservation. ‘The dilemma is corporates are looking for yield but there is little appetite to go into risky assets,’ he said in 2014. With the continuation of low yields, cash portfolio asset allocations were heavily weighted toward money market funds, US Treasuries and agency debt, corporate bonds above the single-A threshold and corporate commercial paper and certificates of deposit. Treasurers were thought to be well served to consider implementing an IHB so that their growing levels of excess cash could work harder around the globe versus sitting in a very low-yielding investment asset.
Now in 2017 Jan Meulendijks states that this is what treasury is all about: companies should not aspire  the role of banker, but submit their cash into the company’s operating cycle as working capital. In fact they should fall back on effective cash management: receive in an effective way and pay with as little cost as possible.
There is a lot to win for SMEs, too.
Jan Meulendijks


Jan Meulendijks
Cash management, transaction banking and trade professional







 Source: iTreasurer

 

 

Managing Treasury Risk – Foreign Exchange Risk (Part III)

| 7-2-2017 | Lionel Pavey |

 

There are lots of discussions concerning risk, but let us start by trying to define what we mean by risk. In my third article I will focus on foreign exchange risk. This risk has to be taken into consideration when a financial commitment is denominated in a currency other than the base currency of a company.
There are 4 types of foreign exchange risk.

Transaction Risk

Transaction risk occurs when future cash flows are denominated in other currencies. This refers to both payables and receivables.  Adverse changes in foreign exchange prices can lead to a fall in profit, or even a loss.

Translation Risk

Translation risk occurs when accounting translation for asset and liabilities in financial statements are reported. When consolidating from an operating currency into a reporting currency (overseas offices etc.) the value of assets, liabilities and profits are translated back to the reporting currency. Translation risk does not affect a company’s cash flows, but adverse changes can affect a company’s earnings and value.

Economic Risk

Economic risk occurs when changes in foreign exchange rates can leave a company at a disadvantage in comparison to competitors. This can affect competitive advantage and market share. Future cash flows from investments are also exposed to economic risk.

Contingent Risk

Contingent risk occurs when potential future work is expressed in a foreign currency. An example would be taking part in a tender for work in another country where the pricing is also in a foreign currency. If a company won a large foreign tender, which results in an immediate down payment being received, the value of that money would be subject to transaction risk. There is a timeframe between submitting a tender and knowing if the tender has been won, where a company has contingent exposure.

Identifying Foreign Exchange Risk

  1. What risk does a company face and how can it be measured
  2. What hedging or rate management policy should a company use
  3. What financial product, available in the market, should be best used
  4. Does the risk relate to operational cash flows or financial cash flows

Initially we need to ascertain what we think future FX rates will be. Methods that can be used include the Forward Rate Parity, the International Fisher Effect which also includes expected inflation, forecasts provider by banks and international forums, along with VaR. Model analysis can be provided, among others, via fundamental factors, technical analysis, and political analysis.

Different FX rates can then be used to simulate the effects on cash transactions when converted back into the base currency. This will provide different results that will allow a company to determine what level of risk it is prepared to accept. Finally a decision must be taken as to whether the company wishes to hedge its exposure or not. Before the advent of the Euro, both the Netherlands and Germany  were members of the Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM). This meant there was agreed band within which the spot rate could move around an agreed central point – this was NLG 112.673 equal to DEM 100.00 with a bandwidth of +- 2.25%. For some companies, this tight band meant that they took the decision not to hedge any exposure between DEM and NLG.

Financial products that are commonly used to manage foreign exchange risk include Forward Exchange contracts, Futures, Caps, Floors, Collars, Options, Currency Swaps and Money Market hedging.

Lionel Pavey

 

 

Lionel Pavey

Cash Management and Treasury Specialist

 

 

More articles of this series:

Managing treasury risk: Risk management

Managing treasury risk: Interest rate risk 

Flex Treasurer op treasuryXL: nog meer nieuwe diensten

| 6-2-2017 | treasuryXL |

Op 19 januari hebben wij jullie op treasuryXL een nieuw concept gepresenteerd: de Flex Treasurer.
treasuryXL en Treasurer Search hebben de handen ineengeslagen om laagdrempelige en hoogwaardige expertise van ZZP’ers uit de treasury wereld te koppelen aan middelgrote en kleine ondernemingen die geen treasurer of cash manager in dienst hebben. Intussen kunnen wij jullie laten weten dat zich al een aantal experts hebben aangesloten bij dit nieuwe concept en er zijn een aantal nieuwe diensten bij gekomen. Graag presenteren wij de nieuwe diensten.

CASH & LIQUIDITY MANAGEMENT ONDERSTEUNING

Heb je een goed overzicht van je liquiditeitspositie? Is er geen versnipperde cash- en kredietbenutting? Ben je onlangs geconfronteerd met liquiditeitsproblemen t.g.v. onverwachte uitgaven? Word je regelmatig geconfronteerd met manuele verwerking van betalingen? Ben je recent geconfronteerd met fraudegevallen? Is het aantrekken van de financiering een issue?

Een treasury expert kan je helpen in het vinden van de juiste antwoorden op deze vragen. Een Flex Treasurer kan ondersteuning bieden op tijdelijke basis, onder meer voor de volgende aspecten:

  • Begeleiding opvolging liquiditeitspositie groep en uittekenen processen in dit verband
  • Assessment van het cash forecasting proces en voorstellen tot optimalisatie
  • Optimalisatie betalingsprocessen (incluis fraudepreventie)
  • Advies selectie bankpartners
  • Nazicht van de bankvoorwaarden
  • Bepalen van de optimale financieringsstrategie
  • Automatisatievoorstellen en begeleiding van de implementatie

FX EN IR RISICO ANALYSE

Heb je een goed zicht op de risico’s die je bedrijf oploopt (o.m. valuta en renterisico) en op de impact hiervan op jouw bedrijf? Heb je een politiek in  verband met de risicoafdekking? Heb je een zicht op de mogelijkheden om ze in te dekken? Koerswijzigingen in valuta en rente kunnen zeer vluchtig zijn en leiden tot onnodige extra kosten. Als je je wilt concentreren op je ‘core business’, zonder je zorgen te hoeven maken over bv. de EUR/USD wisselkoers of de Europese rente dan is het inhuren van een Flex Treasurer de ideale uitkomst. Hij kan de organisatie helpen eenvoudig en effectief de risico’s af te dekken, alsmede te onderhandelen over betere spreidingen en lagere kosten bij uw bank.

OPTIMALISATIE WERKKAPITAALBEHEER

Kamp je met een DSO (gemiddelde betalingstermijn klanten) die veel hoger is dan het sectorgemiddelde? Heb je een duidelijk afgelijnd acceptatieproces en een politiek voor de betaaltermijnen? Is je facturatieproces optimaal? Heb je een afgelijnde politiek voor de selectie en de betalingstermijnen aan je leveranciers? Heb je regelmatig incassoproblemen? Kamp je met wanbetalingen en afschrijvingen op je klantenportefeuille? Ondervind je regelmatig reconciliatieproblemen bij binnenkomende en uitgaande betalingen?

Een treasury & working capital management expert kan je helpen in het vinden van de juiste antwoorden op deze vragen en het optimaliseren van je werkkapitaalbeheer. Een Flex Treasurer kan ondersteuning bieden, onder meer voor de volgende aspecten:

  • Advies bij opstelling en de implementatie van een kredietpolitiek (klantenacceptatie, klantentermijn, e.d.)
  • Afweging eigen risico versus kredietverzekering + bijstand in onderhandeling hiervan
  • Advies bij de facturatieprocessen en standaardisering procedures
  • Advies voor optimalisatie en automatisatie van processen
  • Advies i.v.m. financiering klantenportefeuille (Bv. Factoring, receivables financing)
  • Insourcing credit management en credit collection
  • Bijstand in selectie en implementatie van software oplossingen in dit verband (o.m. credit management /control software en software voor de automatisatie van de verwerking van binnenkomende facturen.

 

In ons actieve netwerk zijn meerdere senior professionals te vinden die ondersteuning kunnen bieden bij deze drie nieuwe diensten en hier meer dan voldoende ervaring in hebben. Daarnaast kunnen zij ook ingezet worden als treasury coach, voor een treasury quickscan, of als iemand ondersteuning nodig heeft bij financiële instrumenten en derivaten. Overigens komen onze Flex Treasurers ook gedeeltelijk uit België, waardoor zij ook daar beschikbaar zijn.

Voor meer details over onze Flex Treasurers verwijzen wij jullie ook naar onze pagina ‘Flex Treasurer‘

[button url=”https://www.treasuryxl.com/community/flex-treasurer/” text=”Ga naar de Flex Treasurer” size=”small” type=”primary” icon=”” external=”1″]

[separator type=”” size=”” icon=””]

Alle Flex Treasurer zijn op korte termijn beschikbaar en kunnen ingehuurd worden voor specifieke projecten of op regelmatige basis. Neem voor meer informatie en mogelijkheden contact op met

Pieter de KiewitPieter de Kiewit via [email protected] of + 31 (0) 6-11119783.

[separator type=”” size=”” icon=””]

 

 

3 easy ways to protect your organization from cybercrime in payments

| 3-2-2017 | Christian van Ledden | sponsored content |

Leoni, a well-known German manufacturer of cables and harnessing has recently made the news through a new type of fraudulent behavior. The CEO-fraud is a technique, whereby scammers act as ‘member’ of the organization and convince the controlling department to transfer funds under the pretense the company was in a financial emergency. USD 2 billion in losses due to CEO-fraud since January 2015.

Leoni is not the first company falling victim to the scam. According to a recent FBI report, CEO fraud has been reported by 17,642 victims amounting up to losses as high as €2 billion (around $2.3billion) in the United States alone. The FBI further reports about an astounding 270% increase in identified victims and exposed losses since January 2015.

CEO-fraud can jeopardize the existence of an organization altogether, as the example of the Austrian lightweight components manufacturer FACC shows. After experiencing losses amounting up to €50million, they were forced to increase their equity in order to continue running.

Rising number of cyberattacks in Europe

According to PricewaterhouseCoopers, the number of cyberattacks in 2015 on finance divisions has increased by a staggering 38%. Root cause for this upsurge lies in the heterogeneous treasury system-landscape, oftentimes including a variety of different ERP systems, eBanking- and accounting tools as well as manual solutions, for instance spreadsheets. Amongst each other, they may communicate via EBICS, HostToHost, SWIFT, ACH or other, even more risky data interfaces. As all these systems operate in silos, the lack of an overarching security process is easily taken advantage of by many criminals.

An additional challenge for finance departments lies in decentralized organizational structures and lacking transparency on bank accounts, daily cash flows and blurred ownerships of workflows and approval processes. The introduction of the four- or six-eye principle will significantly lower the risk of becoming victim to the CEO-fraud as release ownership of financial transactions can be controlled and monitored.

The European Union tightens legislations to protect personal rights

A new legislations released by the European Union will include stricter punishment on organizations for violations on personal rights. The proposed changes include punishments amounting up to €20million, or 4% of global revenue in case of theft of personal data, often found on e.g. bank statements. This change will require organizations to establish more secure mechanisms to protect personal and other sensitive information of their employees.

TIS – Your audit-proof payment transaction platform

3 core topics are crucial for shielding your enterprise from any of these risks: transparency/visibility, workflows and straight-through processing.

Transparency/visibility:

Create global transparency on your banking landscape, including the incoming and outgoing payments as well as the signatory rights of all employees worldwide. Establishing a central overview will enable you to guard your organization against any attacks.

Workflows:

Restructure your workflows and approval processes and include a four-, six-, or eight-eye principle. As no single employee can process a transaction, you actively safeguard your enterprise from cybercrime.

Straight-through processing:

Encryption of your financial data, e.g. from your accounting/ERP-system to your banks and back into your ERP or TMS will minimize your cyber-attack risks and make it harder for criminals.

Together all these methods will help to secure your enterprise from fraudulent behavior and fight the new challenges. These functionalities are a small exert of what the TIS payment platform can offer you.

How do you tackle the challenges of cybercrime and minimize fraudulent behavior? Curious for your thoughts & happy to read them in the comments! Please also visit our website for additional information.

Christian van Ledden

Sales Executive at Treasury Intelligence Solutions GmbH (TIS)

 

Blockchain and Central banks: a Tour de Table (Part II)

| 2-2-2017 | Carlo de Meijer | treasuryXL |

We found this article of our expert Carlo de Meijer and wanted to share it with you. This is the second part of this article, after Part I,  and a slightly shorter version than the original.
A year ago central banks were looking at the blockchain technology, mostly because they wanted to understand what private banks were talking about. The central banks are now embracing the blockchain technology to revamp their own infrastructures. Major central banks worldwide have spent the past year organising their own working groups dedicated to exploring blockchain technology and digital currencies. They thereby try to work out answers to the big questions: how would turning its cash digital affect the economy and financial stability? And determine whether the technology would be robust enough to stand up to hackers.

Central banks and blockchain experiments

Central banks are now even experimenting with digital currencies. A growing number  have made public their efforts in the digital currency and blockchain spaces. Several – and really the most enthusiastic – central banks, including the Bank of England, the Banque de France, the People’s Bank of China, the Bank of Canada, the Central bank of Russia, the Dutch central bank, and the Federal Reserve in the US, are exploring the concept of issuing their own blockchain-based digital currency. Countries like Barbados,  Senegal and Tunisia even introduced their block-chain-based digital currency. Other central banks have expressed stated their intent to develop interbank payment systems based on a blockchain. The European Central Bank recently announced a new research undertaking in partnership with the Bank of Japan. And last month the US Federal Reserve released its first major research paper on blockchain.

Tour de Table

What are all those various central banks doing. In an alphabetical order we will investigate the various initiatives.

Argentina
The Argentinian government and Central Bank authorities are focusing on finding innovative solutions. They have asked the blockchain community to join efforts to “eradicate financial exclusion, transfer the financial industry, promote financial opportunities and reduce inflation”.

The Central Bank of Argentina in narrow cooperation with the Ministry of Production and the Innovative Ministry organised the “Financial Innovation Hackathon” in November last year. On the first day of the hackathon, central bank vice president, Lucas Llach, talked about how blockchain could be a source of innovation in the financial industry. Though Mr. Llach said that its focus now is to work on improving new payment methods, he however added:

Australia
The blockchain issue is also on the radar of the Reserve Bank of Australia. Its head of payments, Tony Richards, said in February last year the RBA “has not reached a stage where it is actively considering this but in the more distant future it is even possible that we may see a digital version of the Australian dollar”. In a recently published paper the RBA however expressed a reserved view on the role blockchain and distributed ledger technology may play in the equity market in the short and medium term. The RBA paper highlights challenges associated with the transition to a new market blockchain-based structure including risks and technical challenges.

Barbados
In a sense, money issue on a blockchain is already happening on the island of Barbados. Early last year tech startup Bitt launched a blockchain-backed Barbadian Dollar, with the support of the country’s Central Bank. The Barbados central bank approved issuance of digital representations of the Barbadian dollar, each equalling a dollar issued by the Central Bank of Barbados, using blockchain. The approved platform, operated by tech startup Bitt, allows users to transact with each other. The ultimate goal is to digitize all the different fiat currencies of the Caribbean region in the hopes of providing the citizens a service that enables them to instantly send money anywhere.

Canada
The Central Bank of Canada last year teamed up with the country’s five largest banks and the R3CEV banking-backed consortium for the “Project Jasper” to create a blockchain enabled currency. In a simulation run last summer, the central bank issued so-called CAD-Coins on to a Ethereum blockchain platform. The banks used the CAD-Coins to exchange (fictional) money in the same way they normally do at the end of each day to settle their master accounts. A great deal of testing however is still necessary before the Bank of Canada can decide whether distributed ledger technology is “ready for the real world”.

China
China’s central bank is looking to recruit blockchain experts to study the technical architecture of digital currencies. The central bank has been working to create and issue a digital currency for years in order to replace cash, the bank’s governor, Zhou Xiaochuan, has said previously. Blockchain technology is among the systems it has examined, such as a series of other digital ledgers that can be reconciled efficiently. The central bank would still retain control over the country’s money supply. A timetable for the launch of China’s sovereign digital currency has not been announced, as of yet.

Denmark
The central bank of Denmark plans to issue blockchain-based E-krone as its reserve currency. The central bank says “blockchain technology, or a variety of that, for example” would be an obvious model to use for virtual currency. Governor Lars Rohde says pros include lower transaction costs. Using such a virtual currency would also make crime harder and improve financial oversight. But when it comes to the societal implications of switching to such a model, Rohde says the Danish central bank still has “more questions than answers.”

Europe
The European Central Bank and Bank of Japan agreed to launch a joint research project to study potential use cases of blockchain technology for market infrastructure. This initiative comes after the ECB revealed that “it is open to taking a closer look at exploring the potential for blockchain technology as a means to further innovation among central banks around Europe”. The bank is “toying with the idea” of tapping distributed ledger technology, among other options, for its renovation of the Target2 real-time gross settlement system and Target2-Securities platform. If this is to happen, more research into the technology is needed, prompting a collaboration with the Bank of Japan which will see findings released next year.

Finland
Also the Bank of Finland joined the growing list of worldwide central banks interested in blockchain technology. Finland’s central bank, collaborating with the Ministry of Finance, held a seminar in November, aimed to discuss “blockchain technology’s risk and rewards in order to forward innovation in the country’s economy”. They thereby  gathered together with the country’s leading researchers from universities, think-tanks, and various industries, to discuss the possibilities offered by distributed ledgers.

 

France
The Banque de France, the country’s central bank, has revealed details about a blockchain experiment for the identification process within the Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA). As well as security reinforcement, this experiment aims at exploring possible consequences of decentralised ledger management functions of SEPA Credit Identifier. The first testing was carried out in July last year in cooperation with the IT-startup Labo Blockchain, a group of French banks, and Deposits and Consignment Fund (Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations). For the experiment, the bank provided the participants with necessary software elements to be installed in external clouds or in their trial IT systems. The central bank stated that a “comprehensive assessment” will be carried out in the coming months to understand the results of the experiment. During January 2017, more details of the experiment will be revealed at a conference organized by the French Payments Committee in Paris.

Germany
The Bundesbank, jointly with Deutsche Börse, is testing the functional prototype of a blockchain-based system for the trading and settlement of securities. Designed to provide the technical functionality for the settlement of securities in delivery-versus-payment mode for centrally-issued digital coins and the pure transfer of either digital coins or digital securities alone, the two institutions plan to develop the prototype further over the next months so that they can analyze the technical performance and the scalability of this kind of Blockchain-based application.
Some of the features of the prototype presented include its capability to be used for blockchain-based payments and securities transfers and the settlement of securities transactions against both instant and delayed payment; and its ability to maintain confidentiality/access rights in blockchain-based concepts on the basis of a flexible and adaptable rights framework. It can also enable the general observance of existing regulatory requirements; identify potential to simplify reconciliation processes and regulatory reporting; and implement a concept based on a blockchain from the Hyperledger Project. It is also capable of settling basic corporate actions such as coupon payments on securities and the redemption of maturing securities.

Hong Kong
Hong Kong’s de-facto central bank, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) intends to launch an innovation hub that will test blockchain and distributed ledger solutions. The HKMA has begun work on the initiative with the Hong Kong Applied Science and Technology Research Institute (ASTRI), an initiative founded by the government to enhance its competitiveness in technology.

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) recently has published a new white paper on distributed ledger tech. The HKMA produced the paper in partnership with ASTRI. The white paper release is only the first step in a wider process, HKMA chief executive Norman Chan said the government is planning further research. And ASTRI is looking to publish a follow-up paper sometime in the middle of next year, building on its past findings and exploring “whether some of this work can be put into action”.

India
The Institute for Development and Research in Banking Technology (IDRBT) established by the Reserve Bank of India – India’s central bank – recently explored blockchain applicability to the Indian banking and financial industry by conducting a workshop with bankers, academicians, regulators and technology partners. The participants produced a White Paper detailing the areas of adoption in the financial sector in India. The Institute also attempted a proof-of-concept on applying blockchain technology to trade finance with the participation of banks, National Payments Corporation of India and a solution provider.

Japan
The Bank of Japan – the county’s central bank – is showing increased interest in blockchain and distributed ledger technology. Accordingly, the staff in the Payment and Settlement Systems Department of the Bank are deepening their understanding of new technologies by test-driving distributed ledgers. These trails by the bank’s staff simply aim to understand the mechanics of DLT, rather than (already) applying it to the Bank’s own liabilities or its payment and settlement systems. Considering the Japanese government and the central bank’s optimism towards the blockchain technology, it is highly likely that they will lead various projects to help banks integrate blockchain platforms in their existing systems.

Netherlands
The Dutch Central Bank (DNB) is exploring blockchain technology as a way to create a permanent digital replacement of cash. The DNB set up a successful three-months trial to run an experimental virtual currency derived from blockchain software, DNBCoin, but nick-named Dukatons (after a 17th century silver coin used in the Netherlands). This DNBCoin could end up being the digital currency issued by the Dutch central bank. Most of the details regarding this project however remain still unknown for the time being.
The Dutch Central Bank has also revealed plans to prepare an experiment aimed at assessing if an entire financial market infrastructure (FMI) can be built on a blockchain, that is much more difficult to hack. The experiment envisions how an FMI’s internal operations could be distributed among participating nodes. To hack and disturb the market infrastructure an attacker would need to gain more than half the computing power running the nodes.

Nigeria
Concerned about the rapid growth of blockchain experiments all over the world, Nigeria’s Deputy Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria has “sounded the alarm” for relevant agencies to begin to take the disruptive technology more seriously. Speaking at an event organized by the Nigeria Electronic Fraud Forum (NeFF), Deputy Governor Adebayo Adelabu described the “blockchain revolution as a “swim or sink” situation. He noted the need for regulators and operators in the Nigerian financial system to be well informed and not left out in the blockchain technology.
For that reason the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and the Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation (NDIC) have instituted a joint committee to look into the effects of the crypto currency and other blockchain technology and its effect on the Nigerian economy.

Russia
In February last year the Bank of Russia – the Russian central bank – established a ‘working group’ to study blockchain technology, in an effort to understand and look for the viability of its real-world applications in the Russian financial market. By April, a report revealed that the Central Bank was considering allowing banks to record and store data of all their transactions on a blockchain. And in July 2016, the Bank of Russia set up a consortium of banks that counted as Russia’s first blockchain consortium.
The Bank of Russia has developed and tested on an Ethereum-based blockchain prototype called ‘Masterchain’ for financial messaging, to be used by banks in Russia.A number of country’s largest banks and financial institutions took part in developing the Masterchain prototype, including Sberbank, Alfa Bank, Bank Otkritie, Tinkoff Bank, and Qiwi. The ‘Masterchain’, as explained by the central bank, is ‘a networking tool’ for participating members using blockchain technology. The platform enables for “prompt confirmation of data actuality” to a transacting customer. The innovation also makes instant communication possible between counterparties among the platform, while assuring confidence in financial transactions.

Senegal
Senegal has recently become the third country in the world (next to Barbados and Tunisia) to introduce a digital currency based on blockchain technology. Named eCFA, the digital currency will be legal tender and is to circulate alongside the current fiat currency, CFA Franc, is. Senegal’s eCFA comes from a partnership by Banque Régionale de Marchés (BRM) and eCurrency Mint Limited, where BRM will issue the digital tender currency, the eCFA, in compliance with e-money regulations of the Banque Centrale des Etats de l’Afrique de l’Ouest (BCEAO), the Central Bank of the West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU). While the eCFA will use the blockchain to keep track of transactions, it will be issued and regulated solely by the central bank, but confer the benefits of transparency and cryptography to prevent counterfeiting and fake transactions. After Senegal, WAEMU will introduce the eCFA in Cote d’Ivoire, Benin, Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger, Togo and Guinea-Bissau.

Singapore
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), the country’s central bank, and the Singapore stock exchange are to launch a pilot project called Utility Settlement Coin with eight local and foreign banks to test the use of blockchain technology for interbank payments. Singapore’s DBS Group, HSBC, Bank of America, JPMorgan, Credit Suisse, and Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ are all working with MAS on the program with support from the global banking consortium R3CEV. R3 blockchain research lab and BCS Information Systems will support the project.

Under the pilot system participating banks will be able to pay each other directly with this digital currency instead of first sending payment instructions through MAS, and banks will be able to later redeem the digital currency for cash. Banks will thereby deposit cash as collateral with the MAS in exchange for digital currency issued by the central bank.
Eventually, the project could result in a payment system for participants to transact in different global markets round-the-clock that are today limited by time zone differences and office hours. Participating banks The next phase of the project will involve transactions in foreign currency, possibly with the support of another central bank.

South Africa
The central bank of South Africa is also looking into the applicability of the blockchain technology in the industry of finance. The Reserve Bank of South Africa’s governor, Lesteja Kganyago, publicly expressed the organization’s “openness” towards blockchain technologies and their intent to help startups come up with innovative solutions using the technology.
The central bank is particularly concerned with the technological and security-related issues blockchain platforms may present. Both the government and central bank of South Africa agree that the blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies need further guidance and assessment from the government before it can be offered to organizations in the public sector.

South Korea
The Bank of Korea has published a report titled “Present Status and Key Issues of Distributed Ledger Technology” detailing policy issues which could hinder the growth of distributed ledgers and also estimates the cost-cutting effect of the application of the blockchain technology. The report mentions that blockchain implementation could save the bank about KRW 107.7 billion (16% of its total costs).
The Bank of Korea is considering implementing a supernode to help mitigate privacy concerns, should it seek to adopt distributed ledger technology. Furthermore, the report recommends implementing the technology for major settlement services such as the BoK wire+ (Bank of Korea settlement system). Addressing privacy issues, according to the report, would require PKI based Key Exchange, Supernode (Central Manager) – who will have access to transaction information along with the trading partner, and Confidential Transactions which will be applicable to distributed systems and maintain anonymity and make deals with parties to access deal information.

Sweden
Riksbanken, Sweden’s central bank, is also thinking about using the blockchain to issue digital money.
The plans to issue an “eKrona”, a blockchain-based digital version of the Swedish Krona, was recently disclosed by the deputy governor of the Riksbank Mrs. Cecilia Skingsley. It is however still in discussions whether digital currencies should complement notes and coins, or replace them. The Riksbank currently is “in the early stages of exploring the idea and is launching a project to explore various possibilities.” Right now it is too early to hope for a quick introduction of the eKrona. Several issues – like traceability, interest, and delivery – have to be examined. Also, the Riksbank does not know which technology it will use to build the eKrona at present. The blockchain is one of the several technologies the Riksbank will look at.

Switzerland
At the kick off at the SIBOS conference last October in Geneva, the president and chairman of the board of Switzerland’s central bank Mr. Jordan described a financial system “turned on its head” by blockchain and distributed ledgers.
“Such systems could render the reconciliation of transactions and balance data between banks and the third-party system obsolete. The paradigm seems to have been turned on its head. Decentralization, not centralization, now appears to promise the greatest efficiency gains.” Jordan said the Swiss National Bank is now in discussions with market participants, regulators and other central banks about what to do next.

Tunisia
Tunisia is one of the early adopters of a blockchain-based digital currency. Late 2015, Tunisia had over half a million people using its digital currency, eDinar. The country’s post office, La Poste Tunisienne, then announced it would partner with Monetas and DigitUs to integrate the country’s digital currency with blockchain technology. This digital currency is issued solely by the Tunisian central bank.

Ukraine
Ukraine is now also exploring the potentials of an electronic money concept. As part of the nation’s Cashless Economy project, the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU) is to issue a blockchain-based digital version of the Hryvnia by next year. At first the currency will circulate alongside its physical version.

United Kingdom
Within the Bank of England, a team is already considering what a central bank-issued digital currency could mean. They have worked with PwC’s blockchain team in Belfast to help them develop a Proof of Concept and explore blockchain.
The Bank of England has released a significant Blockchain paper “Macroeconomics of central bank issued digital currencies,” which discusses the macro-economic consequences of a central bank making a digital form of cash available to the general public. In the model, digital cash is created only when the central bank purchases bonds from households or investors. This central bank digital currency, implemented via distributed ledgers, would compete with bank deposits as medium of exchange. However, banks would still be able to create money.
The model suggests that the introduction of digital cash would have some key benefits: it could boost GDP by around 3%, due to “reductions in real interest rates, in distortionary tax rates, and in monetary transaction costs”, it could give the central bank (via countercyclical CBDC price or quantitative rules) a second monetary policy tool to stabilise the economy; and, it could improve financial stability.

United States
The Federal Reserve is also taking a much closer interest in blockchain and what it can offer to the financial sector. The Federal Reserve released a report on Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) or blockchain early December last year. The document reviews the potential and challenges for the new technology to disrupt and benefit financial services.

The Fed believes utilisation of DLT will become clearer as the technology matures. They further state:
“The driving force behind efforts to develop and deploy DLT … is an expectation that the technology could reduce or even eliminate operational and financial inefficiencies, or other frictions, that exist for current methods of storing, recording, and transferring digital assets throughout financial markets.”
Without making any grand predictions the authors believe DLT adoption will require future research to better understand the impact to the financial industry. Challenges to mass adoption include a list of risk, business and technical hurdles.

If you would like to see the full article please click here.

 

 

Carlo de Meijer

Economist and researcher

 

PSD 2 : The implementation of PSD 2: a lot of opportunities but also big challenges – Part II

| 1-2-2017 |  François de Witte |

After having examined the detailed measures of the PSD2 in my first article, in the 2nd part we will examine the impact of PSD 2 on the market. In order to help you read the text we will once more start with a list of abbreviations.

 

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS ARTICLE

2FA    :   Two-factor authentication
AISP  :    Account Information Service Provider
API :       Application Programming Interface
ASPSP : Account Servicing Payment Service Provider
EBA :     European Banking Authority
PISP :    Payment Initiation Service Provider
PSD1:    Payment Services Directive 2007/64/EC
PSD2  :  Revised Payment Services Directive (EU) 2015/2366
PSP :     Payment Service Provider
PSU:      Payment Service User
RTS :     Regulatory Technical Standards (to be issued by the EBA)
SCA :     Strong Customer Authentication
TPP :     Third Party Provider

Impact on the market

A major implementation journey:

The ASPSP (mostly banks) will have to make large investments in order to comply with the PSD2, in the following fields:

  • Implementing  the infrastructure enabling the application of the PSD2 scheme to the currency transaction in the EU/EEA area, and to the one leg transactions.
  • Ensuring that they can respond to requests for payment initiation and account information from authorized and registered TPPs (third party providers), who have received the explicit consent of their customer for to this. They will have to develop interfaces that enable third party developers to build applications and services around a bank. Internal banking IT systems might need to be able to cope with huge volumes of requests for information and transactions, more than they were originally designed for.
  • Ensuring their security meets the requirements of the SCA (strong customer authentication). This will be a big challenge both for the banks and for the other payment service providers).

PSD2 will make significant demands on the IT infrastructures of banks. On the one hand the IT infrastructure has to be able to be interact with applications developed by the TPPs (PISP and AISP). On the other hand, banks have to develop their systems in such a way that they don’t have to do this from scratch every time a TPP approaches them. This will require a very flexible IT architecture. The banks have to have a middleware that can be used by their internal systems, but also by the applications of the PSP’s.

Although PSD2 does not specifically mention the API (Application Programming Interfaces),  most technology and finance professionals assume that APIs will be the technological standard used to allow banks to comply with the regulation.

An API is a set of commands, routines, protocols and tools which can be used to develop interfacing programs. APIs define how different applications communicate with each other, making available certain data from a particular program in a way that enables other applications to use that data. Through an API, a third party application can make a request with standardized input towards another application and get that second application to perform an operation and deliver a standardized output back to the first application. For example, approved third parties can access your payment account information if mandated by the user and initiate payment transfer directly.

In this framework, the real challenge is to create standards for the APIs specifying the  nomenclature, access protocols and authentication, etc.”. Banks will have to think about how their new API layers interact with their core banking systems and the data models that are implemented alongside this. The EBA (European Banking Authority) will develop RTS (Regulatory Technical Standard) with more detailed requirements regarding the interface between ASPSPs and TPPs. While these are expected to be published early 2017, based on the EBA’s recent draft RTS, the question is whether they will define the interface’s technical specifications.

Emergence of new players and business models

By integrating the role of new third party payment service providers (TPPs) such as the PISP and the AISP, the PSD2 creates a level playing field in the market. Several market experts expect that this will foster innovation and creating new services. For this reason PSD2 should increase competition.

This might lead to a unique open race between traditional players, such as the banks and newcomers for new services and a possible disintermediation of banking services, as illustrated in the figure down below:

Source: Catalyst or threat? The strategic implications of PSD2 for Europe’s banks, by Jörg Sandrock, Alexandra Firnges – http://www.strategyand.pwc.com/reports/catalyst-or-threat

PSD2 is likely to give a boost to the ongoing innovation boom and bring customers more user-friendly services through digital integration. One can expect that the automation, efficiency and competition will also keep the service pricing reasonable. PSD2 will foster improved service offerings to all customer types, especially those operating in the e-commerce area for payment collection. It will enable a simpler management of accounts and transactions. New offerings may also provide deeper integration of ERP functions with financial services, including of their multibank account details under a single portal, and smart dashboards.

PSD2 also enables a simplified processing chain in which the card network can be  disintermediated. The payment can be initiated by the PISP directly from the customer’s bank account through an interface with the ASPSP. In  this scheme, all interchange fees and acquirer fees as well as all the fees received by the processor and card network could be avoided. The market expects that new PISPs will be able to replace partly the transactions of the classic card schemes. A large internet retailer could for example ask permission to the consumers permitting direct account access for payment. They could propose incentive to encourage customers do so. Once permission is granted then the third-parties could bypass existing card schemes and push payments directly to their own accounts.

On the reporting side, the AISP can aggregate consumer financial data and provide consumers with direct money management services. They can be used as multi-bank online electronic banking channel. One can easily imagine that these services will be able to disintermediate existing financial services providers to identify consumer requirements and directly offer them additional products, such as loans and mortgages.

The PSD2 is for banks a compliance subject, but also an opportunity to develop their next generation digital strategy. New TPPs can provide their innovative service offerings and agility to adopt new technologies, enabling to create winning payments propositions for the customer. In turn, traditional players like banks can bring their large customer bases, their reach and credibility. Banks have also broad and deep proven data handling and holding capabilities. This can create winning payments propositions for the customer, the bank and the TPP.

Banks will have to decide whether to merely stick to a compliance approach, or to leverage on the PSD2 to develop these new services. The second approach will require to leave behind the rigid legacy structures and to change their mindset to ensure  quicker adaption to the dynamic customer and market conditions. A first mover strategy can prove to be beneficial.  Consumers and businesses will be confronted with the increased complexity linked to the multitude of disparate offerings. There also, the incumbent banks who will develop new services  can bring added value as trusted partners

Essentially, PSD2 drives down the barriers to entry for new competitors in the banking industry and gives new service providers the potential to attack the banks and disintermediate in one of their primary customer contact points. New players backed by strong investors are ready to give incumbents a serious run for their business. This is an important battle that the incumbent banks are not willing to lose.

The biggest potential benefits will be for the customers, who can access new value propositions, services and solutions that result from banks and new entrants combining their individual strengths or from banks becoming more innovative in the face of increased competition. Market experts also foresee an increased use of online shopping and e-procurement.

Several challenges to overcome

The PSD2 will be transposed in the national legal system of all the member countries. The involved market participants will have to examine the local legislation of their country of incorporation, as there might be some country-based deviations.

The authentication procedure is also an important hot topic. PISPs and AISPs can rely on the authentication procedures provided by the ASPSP (e.g. the banks)  to the customer but there are customer protection rules in place. Hence, they must ensure that the personalized security credentials are not shared with other parties. They also may not store sensitive payment data, and they are obliged to identify themselves to the ASPSP each time a payment is initiated or data is exchanged.

ASPSPs are required according to PS2 to treat payment orders and data requests transmitted via a PISP or AISP “without any discrimination other than for objective reasons”. A practical consequence for credit institutions will be that they must carry out risk assessments prior to granting payment institutions access – taking into account settlement risk, operational risk and business risk. One of  the main issue is the handling of the customer’s bank credentials by third party payment service providers. The bank needs to be able to perform strong authentication to ensure that the authorized account user is behind the initiation message

There are concerns about security aspects related to PSD2. An example hereof is the secure authentication. All the PSPs will have to ensure that they can demonstrate compliance with the new security requirements. How it will be achieved and monitored ? How will TPPs  interact with banks, since there is no need for a contract to be signed?

If something does not work correctly, there will also be discussions on the liability side. The PSD2 states that the TPP has to reimburse customers quickly enough that they are not bearing undue risk, but one will have to determine which TPP had the problem and work with them to resolve it. This will require further clarifications from the regulators.

In addition the PISP and the AISP vulnerable for to potential frauds. Web and mobile applications could become easy target for cybercriminals for various reasons, including the inherent vulnerabilities in the APIs that transfer data and communicate with back-end systems. The openness of the web could allow hackers to view source code and data and learn how to attack it. APIs have been compromised in several high-profile attacks that have caused significant losses and embarrassment for well-known players and their customers. The PSD2’s ‘access to account’  increases not only the number of APIs, but adds layers of complexity to the online banking/payments environment, adding to the risk of fraudulent attacks.

The market is waiting for the RTS (Regulatory Technical Standards) to give guidance on how some remaining security issues will be solved. These include:

  • Treatment of PSU’s (payment service user)security credentials
  • Requirements for secure communication between the PSP and banks
  • Full details and definition of strong authentication
  • Safety of the PSU funds and personal data
  • Availability of license registry for real-time identification of the PSP (PISP or AISP)

It is important that the required clarifications are published soon, in order to avoid a time lag between the implementation of PSD 2 in the national legislations and the real move in the market.

Conclusion

The PSD2 creates challenges, such as the huge investments to be made by the banks, compliance issues and protection against fraud and cybercrime. However several topics need to be clarified such as the RTS and the market players need also to agree on common standards for the interfaces. The clock is ticking in the PSD race.

Traditional players such as the banks appear to have a competitive disadvantage vis-à-vis the new emerging third party payment service providers. However, the Directive opens up new forms of a collaborative approach that can overcome this. New players can provide their innovation and resilience, whilst banks can add value thanks to their large customer base, credibility, reach and ability to cope with high volumes.

The biggest potential benefits might be for customers, who will benefit from new value propositions, services and solutions from new entrants, from banks and new entrants combining their individual strengths, or from banks becoming more innovative in the face of increased and agile competition.

François de Witte – Senior Consultant at FDW Consult

[button url=”https://www.treasuryxl.com/community/experts/francois-de-witte/” text=”View expert profile” size=”small” type=”primary” icon=”” external=”1″]

[separator type=”” size=”” icon=””]

Managing treasury risk: Interest rate risk (Part II)

|31-1-2017 | Lionel Pavey |

 

There are lots of discussions concerning risk, but let us start by trying to define what we mean by risk. In my first article of this series I wrote about risk managment and what the core criteria are for a solid risk management policy. Today I want to focus on interest rate risk. There are 4 types of interest rate risk.

 

Absolute Interest Rate Risk

Absolute interest rate risk occurs when we are exposed to directional changes in rates – either up or down. This is the main area of rate risk that gets monitored and analysed within a company as it is immediately visible and has a potential effect on profit.

Yield Curve Risk

Yield curve risk occurs from changes between short term rates and long term rates, together with changes in the spreads between the underlying periods. Under normal circumstances a yield curve would be upward sloping if viewed as a graph. The implication is that longer term rates are higher than short term rates because of the higher risk to the lender and less liquidity in the market for long dated transactions. Changes to the yield curve (steepening or flattening) can have an impact on decisions for investment and borrowings, leading to changes in profit.

Refunding or Reinvestment Risk

Refunding or reinvestment risk occurs when borrowings or investments mature at a time when interest rates are not favourable. Borrowings or investments are rolled over at rates that had not been forecast leading to a potential loss on projects or investments.

Embedded Options Risk

Embedded options are provisions in securities that cannot be traded separately from the security and grant rights to either the issuer or the holder that can introduce additional risk. Benefits for the issuer can include a call option, a right to repay before maturity without incurring a penalty, an interest rate cap. Benefits for the holder can include a put option, a conversion right via convertible bonds, an interest rate floor.

 

An attempt can be made to calculate the interest rate risk on either a complete portfolio or on individual borrowings or investment. This is done by comparing the stated interest rate to the actual or projected interest rate. Methods include:

  1. Mark to market
  2. Parallel shift in the whole yield curve
  3. Tailor-made shift in the whole yield curve
  4. Duration, DV01, Convexity
  5. Value at Risk (VaR)

These are all forms of quantitative analysis and well recognized. Personally I am of the opinion that VaR is not a very good method for interest rates. Interest rates do not display normal Gaussian distribution – they do not resemble a normal bell curve. Interest rate distribution curves display fat tails compared to normal statistical models.

Financial products that are commonly used to manage interest rate risk include FRAs, Futures, Caps, Floors, Collars, Options, Interest Rate Swaps and Swaptions.

Lionel Pavey

 

Lionel Pavey

Cash Management and Treasury Specialist

 

 

 

More articles from this author:

Safety of Payments

The treasurer and data

The impact of negative interest rates

How long can interest rates stay so low?

 

How much are you paying your bank ?

| 30-1-2017 | Patrick Kunz |

Does your bank send you a monthly invoice how much they charge you on banking costs? Some do but some don’t. Even if you receive an overview of these costs – do you look at them? Often organizations don’t and that’s a pity. A bank is as much a services provider as other suppliers of the company. Of course changing banks is not something you do every year but that does not mean you should never do it or never have a look at your banking costs.

Allthough even if another bank proves to be less expensive, it should not always imply to change the bank, as the indirect costs of a bank change should also be taken into account and you always have the option to renegotiate.

The first step when looking at your banking costs is how your payments look like. Is your company doing only national payments or SEPA or are you transferring (or receiving) money from outside the SEPA region and/or transferring non-EUR payments? This matters because a national payment and SEPA payment will cost you around 0,10 EUR per transaction while an international payment can costs on average EUR 6. The potential saving on international payments is much higher.

There are several ways to reduce the transactions costs:

  • Reduce the amount of transactions. This is often easier said then done because you have to pay your bills and your customers pay theirs to you. However, with international companies there is often a number of intercompany transactions. These transactions do not necessarily have to go via the bank account. They could be settled via in house bank or internal current accounts. Often these intercompany transactions are international transfers or non-EUR payments which brings me to the next point
  • Analyse the foreign currency transactions. As said above these transactions costs around EUR 6 per transaction (and I have seen banks charge up to EUR 50 per transaction) so the saving potential is big, if you do a lot of these transactions. You can ask yourself do you need to pay your supplier in foreign currency? Can I receive my invoice in EUR instead of foreign currency? Often complex questions leading to more questions (hedging?). It is not always possible to change transacting in foreign currency so another solution to reduce transactions costs is to move the bank account to the home country of the currency. This way the “foreign” currency becomes domestic and therefore transactions costs move from international (EUR 6) to domestic (EUR 0,10), a big potential. Of course there are some limitations to this.

Have a look at the total return of your bank. Your bank is one of your suppliers so it makes sense to compare the costs of the supplier to their competitors, especially if you have multiple banking partners. As for suppliers you do not always choose the cheapest but also take into account service level and worldwide availability. It does make sense to compare banking costs every 3 years for market conformity. My advice would be to take into account all banking costs (so also FX deals, corporate finance, trade finance, guarantees). Banks often cross sell their products and the total fees are never visible so you have to gather this information yourself. I prefer to calculate the RAROC (Risk adjusted return on capital) for each banking partner. This way you can easily compare the total return per bank. This helps a lot when renegotiating fees or (new) credit lines. RAROC calculation is not easy and it takes often quite some work to gather all information but once implemented it is a nice tool for companies with multiple banking partners to compare (and rank) banks.

Patrick Kunz

Treasury, Finance & Risk Consultant/ Owner Pecunia & Finance BV

 

 

Blockchain and Central banks: a Tour de Table (Part I)

| 27-1-2017 | Carlo de Meijer | treasuryXL |


Our expert Carlo de Meijer, distinguished blockchain specialist, has published an article that is worth sharing with you. This is Part I and Part II will follow soon. May we invite you to comment or share your experience with this intriguing topic:

In April last year I wrote a blog on blockchain and monetary policy. In this blog I went into a number of still unanswered questions posed by the European Central Bank around blockchain technology. There was a big uncertainty about the impact of this technology on the future role of central bank money and on monetary policy.

 

While at that time many financial institutions and startups already paid a lot of attention to this technology, only a handful of central banks were interested in blockchain with the most vocal being the Bank of England. Since than a lot has changed with a growing number of central banks around the globe starting to recognise the potential for blockchain to help them in obtaining their key objectives: stable financial system and efficient financial markets. In the first part of this blog I will try to answer why there is nowadays so much interest amongst central banks in blockchain technology, what are the main benefits and what are remaining concerns. In the second part a Tour de Table will be given, looking at the various initiatives of the central banks.

Central banks are experimenting with blockchain

Several central banks are or have been experimenting with different versions of blockchain-backed systems. A growing number are questioning the point of creating digital currencies, such as the Danes. But they are not alone. Also the central banks of Sweden, Japan, China and Russia have launched similar efforts. Others such as the central bank of Singapore and Canada have already tested blockchain-based currency systems for internet payments, while also the Reserve Bank of South Africa has expressed their optimism towards the blockchain technology and its potential impact on finance. The European Central Bank recently announced a new research undertaking in partnership with the Bank of Japan. Earlier last month the US Federal Reserve released its first major research paper on blockchain.

Why is there so much interest?

But why are so many central banks now embracing blockchain, seriously exploring their potential.

The turning point was a three-day event in Washington , hosted by the World Bank, the IMF and the US Federal Reserve where representatives from more than 90 central banks worldwide expressed broad interest “in how the technology might impact both the banks they regulate as well as their own regulatory practices”.

Central banks’ interest in deploying a blockchain “comes in step” with moves by the big banks to use the technology to ease cross-border settlement transactions and overhaul antiquated back-office infrastructure. Experiments by banks with distributed ledgers as a way to settle trades and record data and transactions, have clearly shown its potential to reduce costs and increase the efficiency of its operations. The distributed ledger and its potential to simplify the record keeping, tracking and accounting process makes it hard to ignore by central banks.

Central banks and public stances: some quotes

Over the course of the past half year many central banks representatives have taken a public stance on their potential use of distributed ledgers and digital currencies. Here follow some of the most interesting quotes.

 “Innovation using these technologies could be extremely helpful and bring benefits to society. The technology has the potential to transform multiple aspects of the financial system” Janet L. Yellen, Chairwomen Federal reserve

 “We are paying close attention to distributed ledger technology, or blockchain recognizing this may represent the most significant development in many years in payments, clearing and settlement” Lael Brainard, Federal Reserve Board

Other interesting quotes include:

“The conditions are ripe for digital currencies, which can reduce operating costs, increase efficiency and enable a wide range of new applications” People’s bank of China

“A state-sponsored digital currency is still on the agenda, and if adopted, the technology could deliver a range of benefits” Russian central bank

 “The technology could be worth using for central banks because it would make for a financial system that does not go down even if the central bank’s computer systems are temporarily taken offline” Mark Carney Bank of England

What are the potential benefits for central banks?

Central banks are now exploring the potential of blockchain and distributed ledger technology. As banks experiments have shown blockchain networks may lead to safer and better payments and securities systems..

  • Make money more easily traceable

The inherent property of immutability and transparency associated with blockchain makes it easier for the central banks to trace the money that is in circulation. It would allow them to track every euro, pounds, dollar or renminbi on every step through the financial system in real-time.

  • Build single shared record

Central banks are also interested in blockchain technology as a way to build a single, shared record of all transactions among several institutions. The central banks hope they can use the decentralised method of record-keeping to complete and record transactions in the real economy more effectively, quickly and transparently. The creation of a standardised way of recording transactions would allow all the players in the system to communicate more seamlessly. That could leave much less money sitting idle while banks reconcile their different ledgers, as now happens.

  • Simplify the settlement process

It has also the potential to create efficiency. Blockchain or the distributed ledger technology has the potential to simplify the settlement chain around securities transactions. The resulting cost reductions, speed of settlement and enhanced transparency may all contribute to more efficient and safer payments and capital markets.

  • Reduce transmission costs

It may also drastically reduce the transmission costs and time associated with cross border transfers, by enabling instant transfers between branches both within and outside the country.

  • Reduce operating costs

The use of blockchain-based digital fiat currency will reduce the amount of banknotes and coins that are in circulation. This will, in turn, reduce the operating costs associated with printing and distribution of currency notes by the central bank.

  • Fight money laundering

The wide spread implementation of blockchain based fiat currency will also help the central banks (and government’s) fight money laundering while eliminating the issue of counterfeiting.

  • Other advantages

The blockchain technology provides a tool to measure leverage in the system and counterparty exposure, and can monitor compliance in real time. It can also answer questions about collateral ownership.

A blockchain could untangle the spaghetti structure of central swap bank lines, which would improve crisis response capabilities.

  • Reach the unbanked

Digital currencies may eventually benefit the developing world too. Because they are low-cost and easy to use on electronic devices, digital currencies may enable greater access to financial services for the billions of the world’s unbanked.

  • Stable financial system

This all should make the financial system more transparent, fast, efficient and secure. According to a Bank of England research paper produced last year, the economic benefits of issuing a digital currency on a distributed ledger could add as much as 3 percent to a country’s economic output, thanks to the efficiency it could offer.

 Remaining concerns

There are however still a range of questions and all sorts of security and regulatory concerns where central banks will need answers for before blockchain technologies are to become a key part of the future central banking landscape.

Questions such as: How may it impact monetary policy?; What are the implications of issuance of central bank digital money?; What is the impact on physical cash?; How would it impact on central bank seigniorage?; What are the implications for the integration of the European capital market?; and What is the impact on exiting projects such as T2S?

In previous blogs I already tackled some of these issues. See: “Could blockchain bring the EU Capital Market Union forward?” November 6, 2016; “Blockchain: What about T2S?” June 30, 2016; and, “Blockchain and Monetary Policy” April 29, 2016.

There are also a number of concerns that are already highlighted, such as assurance around scalability, data integrity, resilience and resistance to cyber-attack. A big concern is regulation of digital currencies. This is a looming challenge that will require cross-border co-operation. Monetary authorities must come together to start thinking about the necessary regulation of digital money that will be flowing around the world.

See my blog: “Blockchain and Regulation: do not stifle innovation!” April 4, 2016.

When can we expect central bank-operated digital currencies?

When a move to official digital currencies might occur is hard to estimate. Central bank-operated digital currencies could be ‘decades away’ according to the more pessimistic (or realistic?). But what is sure is that it will take a number of years before any central bank issues its own currency onto a live distributed ledger. Research is still at an early stage and many puzzles still have to be worked out.

It has become clear that central banks are set to take a much more active role in the development of blockchain technology. But how active that will be is not yet clear. The Fed’s preference at this stage is still to take a fairly hands-off approach and allow banks take lead the way – “as long as they remain within defined guidelines and best practices”. A switch could happen within the next 5 to 10 years. When large parts of the financial system are using blockchain for financial transactions, so will central banks!

 

Carlo de Meijer

Economist and researcher

 

PSD 2: a lot of opportunities but also big challenges (Part I)

| 26-1-2017 | François de Witte |

The Directive 2015/2366 on payment services in the internal market (hereinafter PSD2) was adopted by the European Parliament on October 8, 2015, and by the European Union (EU) Council of Ministers on November 16, 2015. The PSD2 updates the first EU Payment Services Directive published in 2007 (PSD1), which laid the legal foundation for the creation of an EU-wide single market for payments. PSD2 came into force on January 13, 2016, and is applicable from January 13, 2018 onwards.

By that date the member states must have adopted and published the measures necessary to implement it into their national law.

PSD 2

PSD2 will cause important changes in the market and requires a thorough preparation. In this article, we are summarizing the measures and highlighting the impact on the market participants. In today’s Part I we will focus on abbreviations and main measurers introduced by PSD2.

List of abbreviations used in this article

2FA    : Two-factor authentication

AISP  :  Account Information Service Provider

API : Application Programming Interface

ASPSP : Account Servicing Payment Service Provider

EBA :  European Banking Authority

EBF :  European Banking Federation

EEA :  European Economic Area

PISP :  Payment Initiation Service Provider

PSD1:  Payment Services Directive 2007/64/EC

PSD2  :  Revised Payment Services Directive (EU) 2015/2366

PSP : Payment Service Provider

PSU:   Payment Service User

RTS : Regulatory Technical Standards (to be issued by the EBA)

SCA : Strong Customer Authentication

TPP :  Third Party Provider

Main Measures introduced by PSD2:

The  PSD2 expands the reach of PSD1, to the following payments:

  • Payments in all currencies (beyond EU/EEA), provided that the two PSP (Payment Service Provider) are located in the EU /EEA (two legs)
  • Payments where at least one PSP (and not both anymore)  is located within EU borders for the part of the payment transaction carried out in the EU/EEA (one leg transactions)

A second important measure is the creation of the Third Party Providers (TPP). One of the main aims of the PSD2 is to encourage new players to enter the payment market and to provide their services to the PSU (Payment Service Users). To this end, it creates the obligation for the ASPSP (Account Servicing Payment Service Provider – mainly the banks) to “open up the bank account” to external parties, the so-called, third-party account access. These TPP (Third Party Providers) are divided in two types:

·        AISP (Account Information Service Provider) : In order to be authorized, an AISP is required to hold professional indemnity insurance and be registered by their member state and by the EBA. There is no requirement for any initial capital or own funds. The EBA (European Banking Authority) will publish guidelines on conditions to be included in the indemnity insurance (e.g. the minimum sum to be insured), although it is as yet unknown what further conditions insurers will impose.

·        PISP (Payment Initiation Service Providers): PISPs are players that can initiate payment transactions. This is an important change, as currently there are not many payment options that can take money from one’s account and send them elsewhere. The minimum requirements for authorization as a PISP are significantly higher. In addition to being registered, a PISP must also be licensed by the competent authority, and it must have an initial and on-going minimum capital of EUR 50,000.

Banks will have to implement interfaces, so they can interact with the AISPs and PISPs. However, payment initiation service providers will only be able to receive information from the payer’s bank on the availability of the funds on the account which results in a simple yes or no answer before initiating the payment, with the explicit consent of the payer. Account information service providers will only receive the information explicitly consented by the payer and only to the extent the information is necessary for the service provided to the payer. This compliance with PSD2 is mandatory and all banks will have to make changes to their infrastructure deployments.

Source: PA Perspectives on Nordic Financial Services
http://www.paconsulting.com/our-thinking/perspectives-on-nordic-financial-services.

A third important change is the obligation for the Payment Service Providers to place the SCA (Strong Customer Authentication) for electronic payment transactions based in at least 2 different sources (2FA: Two-factor authentication) :

  • Something which only the client knows (e.g. password)
  • A device (e.g. card reader, authentication code generating device, token)
  • Inherence (e.g. fingerprint or voice recognition)

 

The EBA (European Banking Authority will provide further guidance on this notion in a later stage. It remains to be seen whether the current bank card with pin code is sufficient to qualify as “strong customer authentication”. This “strong customer authentication” needs to take place with every payment transaction. EBA will also be able to provide exemptions based on the risk/amount/recurrence/payment channel involved in the payment service (e.g. for paying the toll on the motorway or the parking).

PSD2 also introduces some other measures:

  • Retailers will be authorized to ask to the consumers for permission to use their contact details, so as to receive the payment directly from the bank without intermediaries
  • There will be a ban on surcharges on card payments
  • There will be new limitations on the customer liability for unauthorized payment transactions

In a second article soon to be published on treasuryXL, François de Witte will focus on the impact PSD2 has on market participants. 

François de Witte – Senior Consultant at FDW Consult

[button url=”https://www.treasuryxl.com/community/experts/francois-de-witte/” text=”View expert profile” size=”small” type=”primary” icon=”” external=”1″]

[separator type=”” size=”” icon=””]