Managing treasury risk: Commodity Risk (Part IV)

| 14-2-2017 | Lionel Pavey |

There are lots of discussions concerning risk, but let us start by trying to define what we mean by risk. In my fourth article I will write about commodity risk, what the strategies around commodities are and how to build a commodity risk framework. More information about my first three articles can be found at the end of today’s article.

Commodity Risk

Commodity risk occurs due to changes in price, quantity, quality and politics with regard to the underlying commodities. This can refer to both the commodity as a whole and an input component of a finished good. Commodity risk usually refers to the risk in a physical product, but also occurs in products like electricity. It can affect producers, suppliers and buyers.

Traditionally, commodity price risk was managed by the purchasing department. Here the emphasis was placed on the price – the lower the price, the better. But price is only one component of commodity risk. Price changes can either be observed directly in the commodity or indirectly when the commodity is an input in the finished product.
Availability, especially of energy, is crucial for any company to be able to undertake operations. Combining commodity risk over both Treasury and Purchasing allows these 2 departments to work closer and build a better understanding of the risks involved. It also allows for a comprehensive view of the whole supply chain within a company. A product like electricity is dependent on the input source of production – gas, petroleum, coal, wind, climate – as well as the price and supply of electricity itself.

There are many factors that can determine commodities prices – supply and demand, production capacity, storage, transport. As such it is not as easy to design the risk management model as it is for financial products.

 General strategies that can be implemented

  1. Acceptance
  2. Avoidance
  3. Contract hedging
  4. Correlated hedging

Acceptance
Acceptance would mean that the risk exposure would be unchanged. The company would then absorb all price increases and attempt to pass the increase on when selling the finished product.

Avoidance
Avoidance and/or minimizing means substituting or decreasing the use of certain input components.

Contract hedging
Contract hedging means using financial products related to the commodity, such as options and futures as well as swapping price agreements.

Correlated hedging
Correlated hedging means examining the exposure of a commodity – the price of crude oil is always quoted in USD – and taking a hedge in the USD as opposed to the crude oil itself. The 2 products are correlated to a certain extent, though not fully.

Commodity risk framework

Commodity price speculation – most contracts are settled by physical delivery – affects the market more than price speculation in currency markets.
To build a commodity risk framework, attention needs to given to the following:

  1. Identify the risks
  2. Measure the exposure
  3. Identify hedging products
  4. Examine the market
  5. Delegate the responsibility factors within the organization
  6. Involve management and the Board of Directors
  7. Perform analytics on identified positions
  8. Consider the accounting issues
  9. Create a team
  10. Are there system requirements needed

Problems can arise because of the following:

  1. Relevant information is dispersed throughout the company
  2. Management may not be aligned to the programme
  3. Quantifying exposure can be difficult
  4. There is no natural hedge for the exposure
  5. Design of reports and KPI’s can be complex

It requires an integrated commitment from diverse departments and management to understand and implement a robust, concise policy – but this should not be a hindrance to running the policy.

Lionel Pavey

 

 

Lionel Pavey

Cash Management and Treasury Specialist 

 

 

More articles of this series:

Managing treasury risk: Risk management

Managing treasury risk: Interest rate risk 

Managing treasury risk: Foreign exchange risk

 

Payment fraud – how companies can protect themselves

|13-2-2017 | Joerg Wiemer | sponsored content |

Information about the opportunities and risks of digitalization is widely spread. In general, risks occur when there is a chance of losing a competitive advantage or falling behind.  However, one of the biggest risks is without doubt cybercrime. Attacks on IT systems worldwide increased yet again by 38 percent in 2015, according to the consulting firm PwC in their “Global State of Information Security Survey 2016”. If these attacks are aimed at the payment transactions of a company, the entire existence of the organization is easily threatened. Therefore, security measures in treasury and payments processes should be at the very top of the agenda. Jörg Wiemer, CSO of TIS, explains how companies can ensure increased security.

In general, when does a risk exist for companies during payment transactions?

JW: In principle, in any situation that involves a lack of transparency across bank relationships and activities. In these cases, cash positions and liquidity are not clear. Let’s assume that a branch transfers ten million dollars at the beginning of the month. If these bookings rely on manual processes and the balance is only checked once at the end of the month, it takes a full thirty days until the fraud is detected. Time is literally money.  By monitoring treasury in real time, it is possible to detect these procedures much earlier, thereby solving them in many cases.   

It can take a lot of time until the head office of the branch gains knowledge about such cases.

JW: This is the heart of the problem: The prevailing regional division of labor makes it easy for fraudsters. If the account statements in paper are collected locally in each branch, it takes weeks until those responsible in the head office notice that an account statement is missing, and with it, the positions written on it. This is exactly why a company should collect all account statements from every bank account worldwide automatically and assess liquidity positions in real time with a software like TIS.

What else facilitates frauds?

JW: Fraud can occur if there is no complete overview of the electronic signing authorities, if there is no dual control principle during payment transactions or during the administration of payment recipients and, in general, during every user administration, which is particularly prone to fraud. These are the typical gateways.

How can I detect that I am at an increased risk?

JW: One reliable indicator of a low level of security in payment transactions is a high amount of manual transactions. Normally, the assumption is that every payment has to be recorded in the accounting system according to the best practices – no booking without receipt, and no payment without a previous booking. Nevertheless, under certain circumstances, there are deviations and exceptions of this principle. The key term here is “exception handling”, which results in a manual payment. An exemption is necessary for these cases, which includes comprehensive process documentation. The possibility of recording and authorization of non-automatic payments should be restricted to certain recipients of the payment and internal user groups. Furthermore, the user should only be allowed to use unchangeable payment templates that have been approved in advance.

How can companies reduce risks?

JW:  A general rule is to standardize and and automate processes across the group of companies! Payment related tasks can be executed on local level, however, based on a standardized and automated process. A central directory of every existing account and a payment governance should be mandatory for every company. Security in payment transactions begins with the professional management of the bank accounts. Otherwise, those responsible run the risk of fraudulent payments through accounts that are not registered in the ledger. The next step is to centralize the payment transactions. Digital payment platforms like TIS pool the cash flow and standardize and automate it. This way, payment procedures and the cash flow are controllable at all times.

What has payment looked like in practice up until now?

JW: Heterogeneous and confusing. Companies have a lot of different systems in each part of their organization and they use different e-banking tools to connect to the banks. The SAP system then generates payments. This is complicated and complex and there are many different protocols and formats. This is the reason for high costs as well as increased fraud risk.

In light of this, which solution approach does TIS pursue?

JW: We provide a payment transactions platform especially for medium and large-sized companies in any industry. The platform connects their accounting system with the respective bank. It then operates between the core systems – which the client does not have to change –  and the bank. Therefore, the platform is the single point of contact, allowing all automated and standardized payment transactions to be combined in a uniform way for the entire company. This makes the management, monitoring and assessment of payment transactions tremendously easier.

The TIS solution runs completely in the cloud. What about the topics of control and secure data storage?

JW: A server as such is either secure or not secure, no matter if it runs in the cloud or in your own house. It is also possible to dial into an in-house server with the banking tools of a company from anywhere as long as the person has the appropriate authorization or the right amount of criminal energy. This is why the server has to be permanently protected from non-authorized access with a high level of modern technology. The big data centers, with which TIS also cooperates, have totally different possibilities than a single company. Let me say a few words regarding the topic of online banking:  the idea that banking tools on a private notebook which runs offline are somehow more secure is an illusion. This computer provides a much bigger gateway for viruses and Trojans than any e-banking solution that runs in the cloud. It speaks volumes, that the Swiss Reporting and Analysis Centre for Information Assurance (MELANI) has recently started receiving a much higher amount of reports from the general public regarding e-banking frauds.

The right software is one part, but what can be done to ensure risk is handled correctly and that the right methods of payments processing are put into place?

JW: Good governance must be established and implemented. Companies need globally valid rules for their payment transactions with detailed guidelines on the following: how accounts are managed, who can open new accounts, who must give permission for this, and the documentation necessary to do so. There are always bad examples for what can happen if the company does not follow the guidelines. Remember the case of the automotive suppliers Leonie mid-2016? Cybercriminals acquired documents and assumed somebody else’s identity. They were then able to divert 40 million euros from accounts of the company to accounts abroad.

My advice on how to minimize risk? Establish governance guidelines and use a central platform for the management of bank accounts and payment transactions. Through automated and standardized processes, companies can protect themselves against manipulation and fraud and, ultimately, the loss of money.

If you are interested to read more about this topic please click on security in payments

joerg wiemer

 

Joerg Wiemer

CSO and Co-Founder of  Treasury Intelligence Solutions GmbH ( TIS)

 

 

 

To be or not to be a treasurer

|10-2-2017 | Jan de Kroon |

 

Recent berichtten de (social) media over een Treasury initiatief van enkele hogescholen onder regie van de Hogeschool Utrecht. Het initiatief behelst een praktische minor Treasury Management waarin de masterstudenten aan de hand van praktische casuïstiek en tooling worden voorbereid op een mogelijk treasury carrière. Het interview met de initiatiefnemers maakte melding van de moeite die sommige studenten hadden met het inleven in de problematiek.

Gastlezing over treasury management

Het doet me denken aan een gastlezing over treasury management die ik zomer vorig jaar gaf aan trainees van een detacheerder die vooral actief is in de zorg. Ter voorbereiding had men zijn best gedaan om zoveel mogelijk kennis en inzicht te vergaren. Tot praktijkcases uit de klantenkring aan toe. Groot was de verbazing toen men ontdekte dat het daar die middag eigenlijk nauwelijks over ging. Althans, niet in eerste instantie.

Een initiatief om in het hoger onderwijs een goede basis te leggen voor het treasury management dat men later in de carrière tegen gaat komen juich ik zonder meer toe.
Wat daarbij echter van groot belang is, en niet altijd voldoende aandacht krijgt, is beleidsmatige en organisatorische ordening die vooraf gaat aan ieder vorm van treasury en überhaupt ieder onderdeel van de financiële functie. Daar vinden we immers de kaders waarbinnen informatie en financiële techniek tot resultaten moeten leiden.

De treasury functie

De treasury functie zorgt voor toekomstige financierbaarheid, voor bescherming van vermogen en resultaat tegen financiële risico’s en regelt de financiële logistiek. Maar dat kan alleen in functie van wat het kernbedrijf van de organisatie in kwestie van plan is. Op de korte maar ook op de langere termijn levert de treasuryfunctie, net als de controlfunctie, randvoorwaarden die aantoonbare toegevoegde waarde bieden. Mits goed ingevuld heeft de financiële functie een positieve invloed op de concurrentiekracht. Net zoals een goed geëquipeerde HR functie dat overigens heeft.

Net als de controller zal ook de toekomstige treasurer zich met het kernbedrijf moeten kunnen verbinden om zich te profileren als de leveranciers van toegevoegde waarde. Inleven in wat de business doet, financiële risico’s zien nog voor ze zich voordoen en net als de moderne controller in zekere zin navigator zijn. Dat vraagt van betrokkenen het vermogen om schijnbaar complexe financiële vraagstukken terug te brengen tot de essentie.

Het vraagt ook om ‘buy in’ en een zeker financieel-economisch bewustzijn van lijnmanagement. Ook van de treasurer-to-be vraagt dat om een meer generalistische kijk op de bedrijfsvoering en wat daarbinnen gebeurt alvorens hij als specialist de kanonnen in stelling kan brengen. Je kunt immers briljant zijn in je visie op financiële markten en meester in financiële techniek; als je geen grip hebt op de onderliggende posities ben je toch gedoemd te falen. En laat daar nou juist de grootste uitdaging zitten!

Jan de Kroon

 

Jan de Kroon

Owner & Managing partner of Improfin Groep

How about these Fintechs?!

| 9-2-2017 | Pieter de Kiewit | treasuryXL

In August 2016 our expert Pieter de Kiewit wrote an article about Fintechs and we thought it might be interesting to publish it on treasuryXL. Since then Fintechs have become a major subject in the financial world. What has changed since the article was written? Are the new solutions a reality now? What further developments do you see? Please feel free to share them with us.

 

In the late ’70s Sony introduced the Walkman. My marketing professor told me that, without market surveys, Sony hit the jackpot. Everybody wanted to have one. Snapchat, my niece, who is 17, understands what they offer, started in May 2012, the company was recently valued at $22 billion. This is beyond what my headhunter brain can digest.

Yahoo was bought by Google for a fraction of what the company was valued at a few years ago. In august 2016 Randstad Holding bought Monster (Monsterboard in The Netherlands) for €400 million. A decade ago Monster, then a multi billion $ company, told everybody they would dominate the recruitment industry forever and they tried to buy every available recruitment company.

How about these Fintechs? The market potential is huge, new solutions will pop up that will change our everyday life. In my opinion it is an extremely diverse group of companies. This market is extremely fragmented and in my perception many Fintechs have, in my perception, a hard time reaching their potential clients. What I notice is that the language of the Fintechs is not the language of the clients they want to sell their business to. The language they do speak is the capital raising language. When this capital staff is hired, product offerings are developed as well as marketing material. The banking industry observes, invests, initiates and wonders what to do. Companies like Google, Facebook, Amazon and others join in this Fintech jungle. Who will dominate in a few years, I can not predict.

Perhaps I am cynical, but I do not see any Snapchats or Yahoos. I hope this will change, because I think, next to banks, there is room for more innovative financial services companies. There are many good ideas out there. I wait for a finance Monster to step up and change market dynamics. Later on we will see if a Randstad will step in and if they will have a sustainable future. Time will tell…

Pieter de Kiewit

 

 

Pieter de Kiewit
Owner Treasurer Search

 

 

Do you want to read more articles about FinTech on treasuryXL?

B2B Fintech: Payments, Supply chain finance & E-invoicing guide 2016

Uitgelicht: Fintech – investeringen in financiële innovatie fors toegenomen.

Will the European banks strike back?

 

The Five Cash Management Initiatives Treasurers Should Consider

|8-2-2017 | Jan Meulendijks | iTreasurer |

 

In October 2014 iTreasurer published an article ‘The Five Cash Management Initiatives Treasurers Should Consider‘ about how treasurers keep focus on ways to keep cash management in their organisation efficient and cost effective.  As this is always an important issue and also relevant in 2017, we asked our expert Jan Meulendijks to comment on the article.

Five initiatives

iTreasurer stated in their article that treasurers should spend their time on five initiatives and that they should be part of a treasurers’ overall budget and resource planning process.

Going beyond SEPA

iTreasurer stated: ‘Initially rolled out as an approach for risk mitigation for commercial payment transactions in Euro, SEPA adopters have found that SEPA, or the Single Euro Payments Area, provides a more efficient way to transfer and collect funds across borders without managing all the different legal payment frameworks of each country. But despite the many bright spots of SEPA, “reconciliation in 2014/2015 was still a challenge,”

According to Jan Meulendijks the development of reconciliation tools has now become an issue for ERP/General ledger software developers and that the banks do not need to focus on it any more. Processing digital account information/account statements are a well established feature of financial software programs and also include the processing of open accounts receivables.

Global Account Rationalization

‘The SEPA initiative has acted as the catalyst for other global projects, with high priority placed on account rationalization. By reducing accounts across Europe, many large US multinational corporations are realizing significant savings in both hard- and soft-dollar costs. “In the SEPA environment, all corporates needed was one account for payments and one account for receivables across the SEPA landscape,’ said Mr. Brieske, Regional Head of Trade Finance and Cash Management Corporates Global Solutions Americas, Global Transaction Banking, Deutsche Bank in the article. At that time keeping every bank happy was  a tough job, if not impossible. Being able to spread the wallet across fewer banks was one of the positive by-products of a bank consolidation.

‘Nowadays it is remarkable to see that “wallet sizing” has turned around completely,’ says Jan Meulendijks. ‘Today it is the companies that determine how much of their wallet will be handled by which bank and the banks no longer have influence on the amount of transactions with a company.’
In-House Bank Structures

Treasurers had  continued to find ways to alleviate the growing cash balances that had become strategically more important to their organizations. Structures like in-house banks (IHBs) were becoming more commonplace as organizations took the next step to further enhance their global liquidity models. The practical considerations for the evolution of the IHB could be directly attributed to global expansion and increased revenue mix overseas in addition to complexities related to time zones, language, growth of regional shared services and decision execution.

The Five Cash Management Initiatives Treasurers Should Consider

Jan Meulendijks states that in the chart of the article the first three steps of “in-house bank progression” are no real in-house bank developments, but treasury-related measures, that now also take place in medium-sized organisations. ‘Only if companies have a real ‘payment factory’, I call it a in-house bank.’
RMB Internationalization

As a result of the ongoing RMB regulatory changes, there had been a significant improvement in the ease of making cross-border RMB payments via China. The RMB was a fairly new currency on the international scene then. The RMB internationalization project had begun to pick up steam over the second half of 2014, with many global MNCs looking to launch new cash management strategies in Asia. New structures were thought to be able to unlock China’s previously “trapped cash” challenge, and optimize their cash held in this part of the world where many opportunities lie for them.

Jan sees a tendency today that the more the deregulation of the RMB progresses the more one can treat it as any other currency. However, this is not achieved yet and Asia will continue to be an region where ‘trapped cash’ occurs on a regular basis.

 Maximizing Excess Cash
According to Martin Runow, Head of Cash Management Corporates Americas, Global Transaction Banking, Deutsche Bank most MNCs then were still very risk-averse and focused on principal preservation. ‘The dilemma is corporates are looking for yield but there is little appetite to go into risky assets,’ he said in 2014. With the continuation of low yields, cash portfolio asset allocations were heavily weighted toward money market funds, US Treasuries and agency debt, corporate bonds above the single-A threshold and corporate commercial paper and certificates of deposit. Treasurers were thought to be well served to consider implementing an IHB so that their growing levels of excess cash could work harder around the globe versus sitting in a very low-yielding investment asset.
Now in 2017 Jan Meulendijks states that this is what treasury is all about: companies should not aspire  the role of banker, but submit their cash into the company’s operating cycle as working capital. In fact they should fall back on effective cash management: receive in an effective way and pay with as little cost as possible.
There is a lot to win for SMEs, too.
Jan Meulendijks


Jan Meulendijks
Cash management, transaction banking and trade professional







 Source: iTreasurer

 

 

Managing Treasury Risk – Foreign Exchange Risk (Part III)

| 7-2-2017 | Lionel Pavey |

 

There are lots of discussions concerning risk, but let us start by trying to define what we mean by risk. In my third article I will focus on foreign exchange risk. This risk has to be taken into consideration when a financial commitment is denominated in a currency other than the base currency of a company.
There are 4 types of foreign exchange risk.

Transaction Risk

Transaction risk occurs when future cash flows are denominated in other currencies. This refers to both payables and receivables.  Adverse changes in foreign exchange prices can lead to a fall in profit, or even a loss.

Translation Risk

Translation risk occurs when accounting translation for asset and liabilities in financial statements are reported. When consolidating from an operating currency into a reporting currency (overseas offices etc.) the value of assets, liabilities and profits are translated back to the reporting currency. Translation risk does not affect a company’s cash flows, but adverse changes can affect a company’s earnings and value.

Economic Risk

Economic risk occurs when changes in foreign exchange rates can leave a company at a disadvantage in comparison to competitors. This can affect competitive advantage and market share. Future cash flows from investments are also exposed to economic risk.

Contingent Risk

Contingent risk occurs when potential future work is expressed in a foreign currency. An example would be taking part in a tender for work in another country where the pricing is also in a foreign currency. If a company won a large foreign tender, which results in an immediate down payment being received, the value of that money would be subject to transaction risk. There is a timeframe between submitting a tender and knowing if the tender has been won, where a company has contingent exposure.

Identifying Foreign Exchange Risk

  1. What risk does a company face and how can it be measured
  2. What hedging or rate management policy should a company use
  3. What financial product, available in the market, should be best used
  4. Does the risk relate to operational cash flows or financial cash flows

Initially we need to ascertain what we think future FX rates will be. Methods that can be used include the Forward Rate Parity, the International Fisher Effect which also includes expected inflation, forecasts provider by banks and international forums, along with VaR. Model analysis can be provided, among others, via fundamental factors, technical analysis, and political analysis.

Different FX rates can then be used to simulate the effects on cash transactions when converted back into the base currency. This will provide different results that will allow a company to determine what level of risk it is prepared to accept. Finally a decision must be taken as to whether the company wishes to hedge its exposure or not. Before the advent of the Euro, both the Netherlands and Germany  were members of the Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM). This meant there was agreed band within which the spot rate could move around an agreed central point – this was NLG 112.673 equal to DEM 100.00 with a bandwidth of +- 2.25%. For some companies, this tight band meant that they took the decision not to hedge any exposure between DEM and NLG.

Financial products that are commonly used to manage foreign exchange risk include Forward Exchange contracts, Futures, Caps, Floors, Collars, Options, Currency Swaps and Money Market hedging.

Lionel Pavey

 

 

Lionel Pavey

Cash Management and Treasury Specialist

 

 

More articles of this series:

Managing treasury risk: Risk management

Managing treasury risk: Interest rate risk 

Flex Treasurer op treasuryXL: nog meer nieuwe diensten

| 6-2-2017 | treasuryXL |

Op 19 januari hebben wij jullie op treasuryXL een nieuw concept gepresenteerd: de Flex Treasurer.
treasuryXL en Treasurer Search hebben de handen ineengeslagen om laagdrempelige en hoogwaardige expertise van ZZP’ers uit de treasury wereld te koppelen aan middelgrote en kleine ondernemingen die geen treasurer of cash manager in dienst hebben. Intussen kunnen wij jullie laten weten dat zich al een aantal experts hebben aangesloten bij dit nieuwe concept en er zijn een aantal nieuwe diensten bij gekomen. Graag presenteren wij de nieuwe diensten.

CASH & LIQUIDITY MANAGEMENT ONDERSTEUNING

Heb je een goed overzicht van je liquiditeitspositie? Is er geen versnipperde cash- en kredietbenutting? Ben je onlangs geconfronteerd met liquiditeitsproblemen t.g.v. onverwachte uitgaven? Word je regelmatig geconfronteerd met manuele verwerking van betalingen? Ben je recent geconfronteerd met fraudegevallen? Is het aantrekken van de financiering een issue?

Een treasury expert kan je helpen in het vinden van de juiste antwoorden op deze vragen. Een Flex Treasurer kan ondersteuning bieden op tijdelijke basis, onder meer voor de volgende aspecten:

  • Begeleiding opvolging liquiditeitspositie groep en uittekenen processen in dit verband
  • Assessment van het cash forecasting proces en voorstellen tot optimalisatie
  • Optimalisatie betalingsprocessen (incluis fraudepreventie)
  • Advies selectie bankpartners
  • Nazicht van de bankvoorwaarden
  • Bepalen van de optimale financieringsstrategie
  • Automatisatievoorstellen en begeleiding van de implementatie

FX EN IR RISICO ANALYSE

Heb je een goed zicht op de risico’s die je bedrijf oploopt (o.m. valuta en renterisico) en op de impact hiervan op jouw bedrijf? Heb je een politiek in  verband met de risicoafdekking? Heb je een zicht op de mogelijkheden om ze in te dekken? Koerswijzigingen in valuta en rente kunnen zeer vluchtig zijn en leiden tot onnodige extra kosten. Als je je wilt concentreren op je ‘core business’, zonder je zorgen te hoeven maken over bv. de EUR/USD wisselkoers of de Europese rente dan is het inhuren van een Flex Treasurer de ideale uitkomst. Hij kan de organisatie helpen eenvoudig en effectief de risico’s af te dekken, alsmede te onderhandelen over betere spreidingen en lagere kosten bij uw bank.

OPTIMALISATIE WERKKAPITAALBEHEER

Kamp je met een DSO (gemiddelde betalingstermijn klanten) die veel hoger is dan het sectorgemiddelde? Heb je een duidelijk afgelijnd acceptatieproces en een politiek voor de betaaltermijnen? Is je facturatieproces optimaal? Heb je een afgelijnde politiek voor de selectie en de betalingstermijnen aan je leveranciers? Heb je regelmatig incassoproblemen? Kamp je met wanbetalingen en afschrijvingen op je klantenportefeuille? Ondervind je regelmatig reconciliatieproblemen bij binnenkomende en uitgaande betalingen?

Een treasury & working capital management expert kan je helpen in het vinden van de juiste antwoorden op deze vragen en het optimaliseren van je werkkapitaalbeheer. Een Flex Treasurer kan ondersteuning bieden, onder meer voor de volgende aspecten:

  • Advies bij opstelling en de implementatie van een kredietpolitiek (klantenacceptatie, klantentermijn, e.d.)
  • Afweging eigen risico versus kredietverzekering + bijstand in onderhandeling hiervan
  • Advies bij de facturatieprocessen en standaardisering procedures
  • Advies voor optimalisatie en automatisatie van processen
  • Advies i.v.m. financiering klantenportefeuille (Bv. Factoring, receivables financing)
  • Insourcing credit management en credit collection
  • Bijstand in selectie en implementatie van software oplossingen in dit verband (o.m. credit management /control software en software voor de automatisatie van de verwerking van binnenkomende facturen.

 

In ons actieve netwerk zijn meerdere senior professionals te vinden die ondersteuning kunnen bieden bij deze drie nieuwe diensten en hier meer dan voldoende ervaring in hebben. Daarnaast kunnen zij ook ingezet worden als treasury coach, voor een treasury quickscan, of als iemand ondersteuning nodig heeft bij financiële instrumenten en derivaten. Overigens komen onze Flex Treasurers ook gedeeltelijk uit België, waardoor zij ook daar beschikbaar zijn.

Voor meer details over onze Flex Treasurers verwijzen wij jullie ook naar onze pagina ‘Flex Treasurer‘

[button url=”https://www.treasuryxl.com/community/flex-treasurer/” text=”Ga naar de Flex Treasurer” size=”small” type=”primary” icon=”” external=”1″]

[separator type=”” size=”” icon=””]

Alle Flex Treasurer zijn op korte termijn beschikbaar en kunnen ingehuurd worden voor specifieke projecten of op regelmatige basis. Neem voor meer informatie en mogelijkheden contact op met

Pieter de KiewitPieter de Kiewit via [email protected] of + 31 (0) 6-11119783.

[separator type=”” size=”” icon=””]

 

 

3 easy ways to protect your organization from cybercrime in payments

| 3-2-2017 | Christian van Ledden | sponsored content |

Leoni, a well-known German manufacturer of cables and harnessing has recently made the news through a new type of fraudulent behavior. The CEO-fraud is a technique, whereby scammers act as ‘member’ of the organization and convince the controlling department to transfer funds under the pretense the company was in a financial emergency. USD 2 billion in losses due to CEO-fraud since January 2015.

Leoni is not the first company falling victim to the scam. According to a recent FBI report, CEO fraud has been reported by 17,642 victims amounting up to losses as high as €2 billion (around $2.3billion) in the United States alone. The FBI further reports about an astounding 270% increase in identified victims and exposed losses since January 2015.

CEO-fraud can jeopardize the existence of an organization altogether, as the example of the Austrian lightweight components manufacturer FACC shows. After experiencing losses amounting up to €50million, they were forced to increase their equity in order to continue running.

Rising number of cyberattacks in Europe

According to PricewaterhouseCoopers, the number of cyberattacks in 2015 on finance divisions has increased by a staggering 38%. Root cause for this upsurge lies in the heterogeneous treasury system-landscape, oftentimes including a variety of different ERP systems, eBanking- and accounting tools as well as manual solutions, for instance spreadsheets. Amongst each other, they may communicate via EBICS, HostToHost, SWIFT, ACH or other, even more risky data interfaces. As all these systems operate in silos, the lack of an overarching security process is easily taken advantage of by many criminals.

An additional challenge for finance departments lies in decentralized organizational structures and lacking transparency on bank accounts, daily cash flows and blurred ownerships of workflows and approval processes. The introduction of the four- or six-eye principle will significantly lower the risk of becoming victim to the CEO-fraud as release ownership of financial transactions can be controlled and monitored.

The European Union tightens legislations to protect personal rights

A new legislations released by the European Union will include stricter punishment on organizations for violations on personal rights. The proposed changes include punishments amounting up to €20million, or 4% of global revenue in case of theft of personal data, often found on e.g. bank statements. This change will require organizations to establish more secure mechanisms to protect personal and other sensitive information of their employees.

TIS – Your audit-proof payment transaction platform

3 core topics are crucial for shielding your enterprise from any of these risks: transparency/visibility, workflows and straight-through processing.

Transparency/visibility:

Create global transparency on your banking landscape, including the incoming and outgoing payments as well as the signatory rights of all employees worldwide. Establishing a central overview will enable you to guard your organization against any attacks.

Workflows:

Restructure your workflows and approval processes and include a four-, six-, or eight-eye principle. As no single employee can process a transaction, you actively safeguard your enterprise from cybercrime.

Straight-through processing:

Encryption of your financial data, e.g. from your accounting/ERP-system to your banks and back into your ERP or TMS will minimize your cyber-attack risks and make it harder for criminals.

Together all these methods will help to secure your enterprise from fraudulent behavior and fight the new challenges. These functionalities are a small exert of what the TIS payment platform can offer you.

How do you tackle the challenges of cybercrime and minimize fraudulent behavior? Curious for your thoughts & happy to read them in the comments! Please also visit our website for additional information.

Christian van Ledden

Sales Executive at Treasury Intelligence Solutions GmbH (TIS)

 

Blockchain and Central banks: a Tour de Table (Part II)

| 2-2-2017 | Carlo de Meijer | treasuryXL |

We found this article of our expert Carlo de Meijer and wanted to share it with you. This is the second part of this article, after Part I,  and a slightly shorter version than the original.
A year ago central banks were looking at the blockchain technology, mostly because they wanted to understand what private banks were talking about. The central banks are now embracing the blockchain technology to revamp their own infrastructures. Major central banks worldwide have spent the past year organising their own working groups dedicated to exploring blockchain technology and digital currencies. They thereby try to work out answers to the big questions: how would turning its cash digital affect the economy and financial stability? And determine whether the technology would be robust enough to stand up to hackers.

Central banks and blockchain experiments

Central banks are now even experimenting with digital currencies. A growing number  have made public their efforts in the digital currency and blockchain spaces. Several – and really the most enthusiastic – central banks, including the Bank of England, the Banque de France, the People’s Bank of China, the Bank of Canada, the Central bank of Russia, the Dutch central bank, and the Federal Reserve in the US, are exploring the concept of issuing their own blockchain-based digital currency. Countries like Barbados,  Senegal and Tunisia even introduced their block-chain-based digital currency. Other central banks have expressed stated their intent to develop interbank payment systems based on a blockchain. The European Central Bank recently announced a new research undertaking in partnership with the Bank of Japan. And last month the US Federal Reserve released its first major research paper on blockchain.

Tour de Table

What are all those various central banks doing. In an alphabetical order we will investigate the various initiatives.

Argentina
The Argentinian government and Central Bank authorities are focusing on finding innovative solutions. They have asked the blockchain community to join efforts to “eradicate financial exclusion, transfer the financial industry, promote financial opportunities and reduce inflation”.

The Central Bank of Argentina in narrow cooperation with the Ministry of Production and the Innovative Ministry organised the “Financial Innovation Hackathon” in November last year. On the first day of the hackathon, central bank vice president, Lucas Llach, talked about how blockchain could be a source of innovation in the financial industry. Though Mr. Llach said that its focus now is to work on improving new payment methods, he however added:

Australia
The blockchain issue is also on the radar of the Reserve Bank of Australia. Its head of payments, Tony Richards, said in February last year the RBA “has not reached a stage where it is actively considering this but in the more distant future it is even possible that we may see a digital version of the Australian dollar”. In a recently published paper the RBA however expressed a reserved view on the role blockchain and distributed ledger technology may play in the equity market in the short and medium term. The RBA paper highlights challenges associated with the transition to a new market blockchain-based structure including risks and technical challenges.

Barbados
In a sense, money issue on a blockchain is already happening on the island of Barbados. Early last year tech startup Bitt launched a blockchain-backed Barbadian Dollar, with the support of the country’s Central Bank. The Barbados central bank approved issuance of digital representations of the Barbadian dollar, each equalling a dollar issued by the Central Bank of Barbados, using blockchain. The approved platform, operated by tech startup Bitt, allows users to transact with each other. The ultimate goal is to digitize all the different fiat currencies of the Caribbean region in the hopes of providing the citizens a service that enables them to instantly send money anywhere.

Canada
The Central Bank of Canada last year teamed up with the country’s five largest banks and the R3CEV banking-backed consortium for the “Project Jasper” to create a blockchain enabled currency. In a simulation run last summer, the central bank issued so-called CAD-Coins on to a Ethereum blockchain platform. The banks used the CAD-Coins to exchange (fictional) money in the same way they normally do at the end of each day to settle their master accounts. A great deal of testing however is still necessary before the Bank of Canada can decide whether distributed ledger technology is “ready for the real world”.

China
China’s central bank is looking to recruit blockchain experts to study the technical architecture of digital currencies. The central bank has been working to create and issue a digital currency for years in order to replace cash, the bank’s governor, Zhou Xiaochuan, has said previously. Blockchain technology is among the systems it has examined, such as a series of other digital ledgers that can be reconciled efficiently. The central bank would still retain control over the country’s money supply. A timetable for the launch of China’s sovereign digital currency has not been announced, as of yet.

Denmark
The central bank of Denmark plans to issue blockchain-based E-krone as its reserve currency. The central bank says “blockchain technology, or a variety of that, for example” would be an obvious model to use for virtual currency. Governor Lars Rohde says pros include lower transaction costs. Using such a virtual currency would also make crime harder and improve financial oversight. But when it comes to the societal implications of switching to such a model, Rohde says the Danish central bank still has “more questions than answers.”

Europe
The European Central Bank and Bank of Japan agreed to launch a joint research project to study potential use cases of blockchain technology for market infrastructure. This initiative comes after the ECB revealed that “it is open to taking a closer look at exploring the potential for blockchain technology as a means to further innovation among central banks around Europe”. The bank is “toying with the idea” of tapping distributed ledger technology, among other options, for its renovation of the Target2 real-time gross settlement system and Target2-Securities platform. If this is to happen, more research into the technology is needed, prompting a collaboration with the Bank of Japan which will see findings released next year.

Finland
Also the Bank of Finland joined the growing list of worldwide central banks interested in blockchain technology. Finland’s central bank, collaborating with the Ministry of Finance, held a seminar in November, aimed to discuss “blockchain technology’s risk and rewards in order to forward innovation in the country’s economy”. They thereby  gathered together with the country’s leading researchers from universities, think-tanks, and various industries, to discuss the possibilities offered by distributed ledgers.

 

France
The Banque de France, the country’s central bank, has revealed details about a blockchain experiment for the identification process within the Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA). As well as security reinforcement, this experiment aims at exploring possible consequences of decentralised ledger management functions of SEPA Credit Identifier. The first testing was carried out in July last year in cooperation with the IT-startup Labo Blockchain, a group of French banks, and Deposits and Consignment Fund (Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations). For the experiment, the bank provided the participants with necessary software elements to be installed in external clouds or in their trial IT systems. The central bank stated that a “comprehensive assessment” will be carried out in the coming months to understand the results of the experiment. During January 2017, more details of the experiment will be revealed at a conference organized by the French Payments Committee in Paris.

Germany
The Bundesbank, jointly with Deutsche Börse, is testing the functional prototype of a blockchain-based system for the trading and settlement of securities. Designed to provide the technical functionality for the settlement of securities in delivery-versus-payment mode for centrally-issued digital coins and the pure transfer of either digital coins or digital securities alone, the two institutions plan to develop the prototype further over the next months so that they can analyze the technical performance and the scalability of this kind of Blockchain-based application.
Some of the features of the prototype presented include its capability to be used for blockchain-based payments and securities transfers and the settlement of securities transactions against both instant and delayed payment; and its ability to maintain confidentiality/access rights in blockchain-based concepts on the basis of a flexible and adaptable rights framework. It can also enable the general observance of existing regulatory requirements; identify potential to simplify reconciliation processes and regulatory reporting; and implement a concept based on a blockchain from the Hyperledger Project. It is also capable of settling basic corporate actions such as coupon payments on securities and the redemption of maturing securities.

Hong Kong
Hong Kong’s de-facto central bank, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) intends to launch an innovation hub that will test blockchain and distributed ledger solutions. The HKMA has begun work on the initiative with the Hong Kong Applied Science and Technology Research Institute (ASTRI), an initiative founded by the government to enhance its competitiveness in technology.

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) recently has published a new white paper on distributed ledger tech. The HKMA produced the paper in partnership with ASTRI. The white paper release is only the first step in a wider process, HKMA chief executive Norman Chan said the government is planning further research. And ASTRI is looking to publish a follow-up paper sometime in the middle of next year, building on its past findings and exploring “whether some of this work can be put into action”.

India
The Institute for Development and Research in Banking Technology (IDRBT) established by the Reserve Bank of India – India’s central bank – recently explored blockchain applicability to the Indian banking and financial industry by conducting a workshop with bankers, academicians, regulators and technology partners. The participants produced a White Paper detailing the areas of adoption in the financial sector in India. The Institute also attempted a proof-of-concept on applying blockchain technology to trade finance with the participation of banks, National Payments Corporation of India and a solution provider.

Japan
The Bank of Japan – the county’s central bank – is showing increased interest in blockchain and distributed ledger technology. Accordingly, the staff in the Payment and Settlement Systems Department of the Bank are deepening their understanding of new technologies by test-driving distributed ledgers. These trails by the bank’s staff simply aim to understand the mechanics of DLT, rather than (already) applying it to the Bank’s own liabilities or its payment and settlement systems. Considering the Japanese government and the central bank’s optimism towards the blockchain technology, it is highly likely that they will lead various projects to help banks integrate blockchain platforms in their existing systems.

Netherlands
The Dutch Central Bank (DNB) is exploring blockchain technology as a way to create a permanent digital replacement of cash. The DNB set up a successful three-months trial to run an experimental virtual currency derived from blockchain software, DNBCoin, but nick-named Dukatons (after a 17th century silver coin used in the Netherlands). This DNBCoin could end up being the digital currency issued by the Dutch central bank. Most of the details regarding this project however remain still unknown for the time being.
The Dutch Central Bank has also revealed plans to prepare an experiment aimed at assessing if an entire financial market infrastructure (FMI) can be built on a blockchain, that is much more difficult to hack. The experiment envisions how an FMI’s internal operations could be distributed among participating nodes. To hack and disturb the market infrastructure an attacker would need to gain more than half the computing power running the nodes.

Nigeria
Concerned about the rapid growth of blockchain experiments all over the world, Nigeria’s Deputy Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria has “sounded the alarm” for relevant agencies to begin to take the disruptive technology more seriously. Speaking at an event organized by the Nigeria Electronic Fraud Forum (NeFF), Deputy Governor Adebayo Adelabu described the “blockchain revolution as a “swim or sink” situation. He noted the need for regulators and operators in the Nigerian financial system to be well informed and not left out in the blockchain technology.
For that reason the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and the Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation (NDIC) have instituted a joint committee to look into the effects of the crypto currency and other blockchain technology and its effect on the Nigerian economy.

Russia
In February last year the Bank of Russia – the Russian central bank – established a ‘working group’ to study blockchain technology, in an effort to understand and look for the viability of its real-world applications in the Russian financial market. By April, a report revealed that the Central Bank was considering allowing banks to record and store data of all their transactions on a blockchain. And in July 2016, the Bank of Russia set up a consortium of banks that counted as Russia’s first blockchain consortium.
The Bank of Russia has developed and tested on an Ethereum-based blockchain prototype called ‘Masterchain’ for financial messaging, to be used by banks in Russia.A number of country’s largest banks and financial institutions took part in developing the Masterchain prototype, including Sberbank, Alfa Bank, Bank Otkritie, Tinkoff Bank, and Qiwi. The ‘Masterchain’, as explained by the central bank, is ‘a networking tool’ for participating members using blockchain technology. The platform enables for “prompt confirmation of data actuality” to a transacting customer. The innovation also makes instant communication possible between counterparties among the platform, while assuring confidence in financial transactions.

Senegal
Senegal has recently become the third country in the world (next to Barbados and Tunisia) to introduce a digital currency based on blockchain technology. Named eCFA, the digital currency will be legal tender and is to circulate alongside the current fiat currency, CFA Franc, is. Senegal’s eCFA comes from a partnership by Banque Régionale de Marchés (BRM) and eCurrency Mint Limited, where BRM will issue the digital tender currency, the eCFA, in compliance with e-money regulations of the Banque Centrale des Etats de l’Afrique de l’Ouest (BCEAO), the Central Bank of the West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU). While the eCFA will use the blockchain to keep track of transactions, it will be issued and regulated solely by the central bank, but confer the benefits of transparency and cryptography to prevent counterfeiting and fake transactions. After Senegal, WAEMU will introduce the eCFA in Cote d’Ivoire, Benin, Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger, Togo and Guinea-Bissau.

Singapore
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), the country’s central bank, and the Singapore stock exchange are to launch a pilot project called Utility Settlement Coin with eight local and foreign banks to test the use of blockchain technology for interbank payments. Singapore’s DBS Group, HSBC, Bank of America, JPMorgan, Credit Suisse, and Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ are all working with MAS on the program with support from the global banking consortium R3CEV. R3 blockchain research lab and BCS Information Systems will support the project.

Under the pilot system participating banks will be able to pay each other directly with this digital currency instead of first sending payment instructions through MAS, and banks will be able to later redeem the digital currency for cash. Banks will thereby deposit cash as collateral with the MAS in exchange for digital currency issued by the central bank.
Eventually, the project could result in a payment system for participants to transact in different global markets round-the-clock that are today limited by time zone differences and office hours. Participating banks The next phase of the project will involve transactions in foreign currency, possibly with the support of another central bank.

South Africa
The central bank of South Africa is also looking into the applicability of the blockchain technology in the industry of finance. The Reserve Bank of South Africa’s governor, Lesteja Kganyago, publicly expressed the organization’s “openness” towards blockchain technologies and their intent to help startups come up with innovative solutions using the technology.
The central bank is particularly concerned with the technological and security-related issues blockchain platforms may present. Both the government and central bank of South Africa agree that the blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies need further guidance and assessment from the government before it can be offered to organizations in the public sector.

South Korea
The Bank of Korea has published a report titled “Present Status and Key Issues of Distributed Ledger Technology” detailing policy issues which could hinder the growth of distributed ledgers and also estimates the cost-cutting effect of the application of the blockchain technology. The report mentions that blockchain implementation could save the bank about KRW 107.7 billion (16% of its total costs).
The Bank of Korea is considering implementing a supernode to help mitigate privacy concerns, should it seek to adopt distributed ledger technology. Furthermore, the report recommends implementing the technology for major settlement services such as the BoK wire+ (Bank of Korea settlement system). Addressing privacy issues, according to the report, would require PKI based Key Exchange, Supernode (Central Manager) – who will have access to transaction information along with the trading partner, and Confidential Transactions which will be applicable to distributed systems and maintain anonymity and make deals with parties to access deal information.

Sweden
Riksbanken, Sweden’s central bank, is also thinking about using the blockchain to issue digital money.
The plans to issue an “eKrona”, a blockchain-based digital version of the Swedish Krona, was recently disclosed by the deputy governor of the Riksbank Mrs. Cecilia Skingsley. It is however still in discussions whether digital currencies should complement notes and coins, or replace them. The Riksbank currently is “in the early stages of exploring the idea and is launching a project to explore various possibilities.” Right now it is too early to hope for a quick introduction of the eKrona. Several issues – like traceability, interest, and delivery – have to be examined. Also, the Riksbank does not know which technology it will use to build the eKrona at present. The blockchain is one of the several technologies the Riksbank will look at.

Switzerland
At the kick off at the SIBOS conference last October in Geneva, the president and chairman of the board of Switzerland’s central bank Mr. Jordan described a financial system “turned on its head” by blockchain and distributed ledgers.
“Such systems could render the reconciliation of transactions and balance data between banks and the third-party system obsolete. The paradigm seems to have been turned on its head. Decentralization, not centralization, now appears to promise the greatest efficiency gains.” Jordan said the Swiss National Bank is now in discussions with market participants, regulators and other central banks about what to do next.

Tunisia
Tunisia is one of the early adopters of a blockchain-based digital currency. Late 2015, Tunisia had over half a million people using its digital currency, eDinar. The country’s post office, La Poste Tunisienne, then announced it would partner with Monetas and DigitUs to integrate the country’s digital currency with blockchain technology. This digital currency is issued solely by the Tunisian central bank.

Ukraine
Ukraine is now also exploring the potentials of an electronic money concept. As part of the nation’s Cashless Economy project, the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU) is to issue a blockchain-based digital version of the Hryvnia by next year. At first the currency will circulate alongside its physical version.

United Kingdom
Within the Bank of England, a team is already considering what a central bank-issued digital currency could mean. They have worked with PwC’s blockchain team in Belfast to help them develop a Proof of Concept and explore blockchain.
The Bank of England has released a significant Blockchain paper “Macroeconomics of central bank issued digital currencies,” which discusses the macro-economic consequences of a central bank making a digital form of cash available to the general public. In the model, digital cash is created only when the central bank purchases bonds from households or investors. This central bank digital currency, implemented via distributed ledgers, would compete with bank deposits as medium of exchange. However, banks would still be able to create money.
The model suggests that the introduction of digital cash would have some key benefits: it could boost GDP by around 3%, due to “reductions in real interest rates, in distortionary tax rates, and in monetary transaction costs”, it could give the central bank (via countercyclical CBDC price or quantitative rules) a second monetary policy tool to stabilise the economy; and, it could improve financial stability.

United States
The Federal Reserve is also taking a much closer interest in blockchain and what it can offer to the financial sector. The Federal Reserve released a report on Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) or blockchain early December last year. The document reviews the potential and challenges for the new technology to disrupt and benefit financial services.

The Fed believes utilisation of DLT will become clearer as the technology matures. They further state:
“The driving force behind efforts to develop and deploy DLT … is an expectation that the technology could reduce or even eliminate operational and financial inefficiencies, or other frictions, that exist for current methods of storing, recording, and transferring digital assets throughout financial markets.”
Without making any grand predictions the authors believe DLT adoption will require future research to better understand the impact to the financial industry. Challenges to mass adoption include a list of risk, business and technical hurdles.

If you would like to see the full article please click here.

 

 

Carlo de Meijer

Economist and researcher

 

PSD 2 : The implementation of PSD 2: a lot of opportunities but also big challenges – Part II

| 1-2-2017 |  François de Witte |

After having examined the detailed measures of the PSD2 in my first article, in the 2nd part we will examine the impact of PSD 2 on the market. In order to help you read the text we will once more start with a list of abbreviations.

 

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS ARTICLE

2FA    :   Two-factor authentication
AISP  :    Account Information Service Provider
API :       Application Programming Interface
ASPSP : Account Servicing Payment Service Provider
EBA :     European Banking Authority
PISP :    Payment Initiation Service Provider
PSD1:    Payment Services Directive 2007/64/EC
PSD2  :  Revised Payment Services Directive (EU) 2015/2366
PSP :     Payment Service Provider
PSU:      Payment Service User
RTS :     Regulatory Technical Standards (to be issued by the EBA)
SCA :     Strong Customer Authentication
TPP :     Third Party Provider

Impact on the market

A major implementation journey:

The ASPSP (mostly banks) will have to make large investments in order to comply with the PSD2, in the following fields:

  • Implementing  the infrastructure enabling the application of the PSD2 scheme to the currency transaction in the EU/EEA area, and to the one leg transactions.
  • Ensuring that they can respond to requests for payment initiation and account information from authorized and registered TPPs (third party providers), who have received the explicit consent of their customer for to this. They will have to develop interfaces that enable third party developers to build applications and services around a bank. Internal banking IT systems might need to be able to cope with huge volumes of requests for information and transactions, more than they were originally designed for.
  • Ensuring their security meets the requirements of the SCA (strong customer authentication). This will be a big challenge both for the banks and for the other payment service providers).

PSD2 will make significant demands on the IT infrastructures of banks. On the one hand the IT infrastructure has to be able to be interact with applications developed by the TPPs (PISP and AISP). On the other hand, banks have to develop their systems in such a way that they don’t have to do this from scratch every time a TPP approaches them. This will require a very flexible IT architecture. The banks have to have a middleware that can be used by their internal systems, but also by the applications of the PSP’s.

Although PSD2 does not specifically mention the API (Application Programming Interfaces),  most technology and finance professionals assume that APIs will be the technological standard used to allow banks to comply with the regulation.

An API is a set of commands, routines, protocols and tools which can be used to develop interfacing programs. APIs define how different applications communicate with each other, making available certain data from a particular program in a way that enables other applications to use that data. Through an API, a third party application can make a request with standardized input towards another application and get that second application to perform an operation and deliver a standardized output back to the first application. For example, approved third parties can access your payment account information if mandated by the user and initiate payment transfer directly.

In this framework, the real challenge is to create standards for the APIs specifying the  nomenclature, access protocols and authentication, etc.”. Banks will have to think about how their new API layers interact with their core banking systems and the data models that are implemented alongside this. The EBA (European Banking Authority) will develop RTS (Regulatory Technical Standard) with more detailed requirements regarding the interface between ASPSPs and TPPs. While these are expected to be published early 2017, based on the EBA’s recent draft RTS, the question is whether they will define the interface’s technical specifications.

Emergence of new players and business models

By integrating the role of new third party payment service providers (TPPs) such as the PISP and the AISP, the PSD2 creates a level playing field in the market. Several market experts expect that this will foster innovation and creating new services. For this reason PSD2 should increase competition.

This might lead to a unique open race between traditional players, such as the banks and newcomers for new services and a possible disintermediation of banking services, as illustrated in the figure down below:

Source: Catalyst or threat? The strategic implications of PSD2 for Europe’s banks, by Jörg Sandrock, Alexandra Firnges – http://www.strategyand.pwc.com/reports/catalyst-or-threat

PSD2 is likely to give a boost to the ongoing innovation boom and bring customers more user-friendly services through digital integration. One can expect that the automation, efficiency and competition will also keep the service pricing reasonable. PSD2 will foster improved service offerings to all customer types, especially those operating in the e-commerce area for payment collection. It will enable a simpler management of accounts and transactions. New offerings may also provide deeper integration of ERP functions with financial services, including of their multibank account details under a single portal, and smart dashboards.

PSD2 also enables a simplified processing chain in which the card network can be  disintermediated. The payment can be initiated by the PISP directly from the customer’s bank account through an interface with the ASPSP. In  this scheme, all interchange fees and acquirer fees as well as all the fees received by the processor and card network could be avoided. The market expects that new PISPs will be able to replace partly the transactions of the classic card schemes. A large internet retailer could for example ask permission to the consumers permitting direct account access for payment. They could propose incentive to encourage customers do so. Once permission is granted then the third-parties could bypass existing card schemes and push payments directly to their own accounts.

On the reporting side, the AISP can aggregate consumer financial data and provide consumers with direct money management services. They can be used as multi-bank online electronic banking channel. One can easily imagine that these services will be able to disintermediate existing financial services providers to identify consumer requirements and directly offer them additional products, such as loans and mortgages.

The PSD2 is for banks a compliance subject, but also an opportunity to develop their next generation digital strategy. New TPPs can provide their innovative service offerings and agility to adopt new technologies, enabling to create winning payments propositions for the customer. In turn, traditional players like banks can bring their large customer bases, their reach and credibility. Banks have also broad and deep proven data handling and holding capabilities. This can create winning payments propositions for the customer, the bank and the TPP.

Banks will have to decide whether to merely stick to a compliance approach, or to leverage on the PSD2 to develop these new services. The second approach will require to leave behind the rigid legacy structures and to change their mindset to ensure  quicker adaption to the dynamic customer and market conditions. A first mover strategy can prove to be beneficial.  Consumers and businesses will be confronted with the increased complexity linked to the multitude of disparate offerings. There also, the incumbent banks who will develop new services  can bring added value as trusted partners

Essentially, PSD2 drives down the barriers to entry for new competitors in the banking industry and gives new service providers the potential to attack the banks and disintermediate in one of their primary customer contact points. New players backed by strong investors are ready to give incumbents a serious run for their business. This is an important battle that the incumbent banks are not willing to lose.

The biggest potential benefits will be for the customers, who can access new value propositions, services and solutions that result from banks and new entrants combining their individual strengths or from banks becoming more innovative in the face of increased competition. Market experts also foresee an increased use of online shopping and e-procurement.

Several challenges to overcome

The PSD2 will be transposed in the national legal system of all the member countries. The involved market participants will have to examine the local legislation of their country of incorporation, as there might be some country-based deviations.

The authentication procedure is also an important hot topic. PISPs and AISPs can rely on the authentication procedures provided by the ASPSP (e.g. the banks)  to the customer but there are customer protection rules in place. Hence, they must ensure that the personalized security credentials are not shared with other parties. They also may not store sensitive payment data, and they are obliged to identify themselves to the ASPSP each time a payment is initiated or data is exchanged.

ASPSPs are required according to PS2 to treat payment orders and data requests transmitted via a PISP or AISP “without any discrimination other than for objective reasons”. A practical consequence for credit institutions will be that they must carry out risk assessments prior to granting payment institutions access – taking into account settlement risk, operational risk and business risk. One of  the main issue is the handling of the customer’s bank credentials by third party payment service providers. The bank needs to be able to perform strong authentication to ensure that the authorized account user is behind the initiation message

There are concerns about security aspects related to PSD2. An example hereof is the secure authentication. All the PSPs will have to ensure that they can demonstrate compliance with the new security requirements. How it will be achieved and monitored ? How will TPPs  interact with banks, since there is no need for a contract to be signed?

If something does not work correctly, there will also be discussions on the liability side. The PSD2 states that the TPP has to reimburse customers quickly enough that they are not bearing undue risk, but one will have to determine which TPP had the problem and work with them to resolve it. This will require further clarifications from the regulators.

In addition the PISP and the AISP vulnerable for to potential frauds. Web and mobile applications could become easy target for cybercriminals for various reasons, including the inherent vulnerabilities in the APIs that transfer data and communicate with back-end systems. The openness of the web could allow hackers to view source code and data and learn how to attack it. APIs have been compromised in several high-profile attacks that have caused significant losses and embarrassment for well-known players and their customers. The PSD2’s ‘access to account’  increases not only the number of APIs, but adds layers of complexity to the online banking/payments environment, adding to the risk of fraudulent attacks.

The market is waiting for the RTS (Regulatory Technical Standards) to give guidance on how some remaining security issues will be solved. These include:

  • Treatment of PSU’s (payment service user)security credentials
  • Requirements for secure communication between the PSP and banks
  • Full details and definition of strong authentication
  • Safety of the PSU funds and personal data
  • Availability of license registry for real-time identification of the PSP (PISP or AISP)

It is important that the required clarifications are published soon, in order to avoid a time lag between the implementation of PSD 2 in the national legislations and the real move in the market.

Conclusion

The PSD2 creates challenges, such as the huge investments to be made by the banks, compliance issues and protection against fraud and cybercrime. However several topics need to be clarified such as the RTS and the market players need also to agree on common standards for the interfaces. The clock is ticking in the PSD race.

Traditional players such as the banks appear to have a competitive disadvantage vis-à-vis the new emerging third party payment service providers. However, the Directive opens up new forms of a collaborative approach that can overcome this. New players can provide their innovation and resilience, whilst banks can add value thanks to their large customer base, credibility, reach and ability to cope with high volumes.

The biggest potential benefits might be for customers, who will benefit from new value propositions, services and solutions from new entrants, from banks and new entrants combining their individual strengths, or from banks becoming more innovative in the face of increased and agile competition.

François de Witte – Senior Consultant at FDW Consult

[button url=”https://www.treasuryxl.com/community/experts/francois-de-witte/” text=”View expert profile” size=”small” type=”primary” icon=”” external=”1″]

[separator type=”” size=”” icon=””]