TIS Webinar: SEPA in Sweden – The key to a smooth transition

| 27-10-2016 | TIS | Sponsored content |

TIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions GMBH)Dear community members, we would like to bring this TIS webinar under your attention. On November 3th between 04:00 and 04:30 PM TIS will host : SEPA in Sweden – The key to a smooth transition. We think it will be an interesting session and hope to hear your reactions afterwards!

Are you set for SEPA? On October 31st, Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA) aims to make the payment of goods and services in Europe easier while allowing you centralized payments and liquidity management.

However, what steps do you need to take to ensure your organization is prepared for this shift? Which elements can you already prepare for, and where should you reach out for assistance? And, have you ensured that your ERP systems are compatible for ISO 20022?

Stop wondering, start smooth sailing towards SEPA.
Join TIS for a live webinar to check off your list of to-do’s and also answer any questions you might have.

[button url=”https://tis-events.webex.com/mw3100/mywebex/default.do?nomenu=true&siteurl=tis-events&service=6&rnd=0.2917359935874274&main_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftis-events.webex.com%2Fec3100%2Feventcenter%2Fevent%2FeventAction.do%3FtheAction%3Ddetail%26%26%26EMK%3D4832534b00000002edf712f4ecc2249519d1dc58eb4f31a74c63cee16509512589a77a4804d6994e%26siteurl%3Dtis-events%26confViewID%3D1870525416%26encryptTicket%3DSDJTSwAAAALPl0zNmUpgmI0ZTdmh_lfOspAjHfQ7aZIiVhBE1SjBjw2%26″ text=”Read more | Register ” size=”” type=”primary” icon=”” external=”1″]

[separator type=”” size=”” icon=””]

Reports: Journeys to Treasury, Treasury Systems Guide and The Future of Treasury Management Systems

| 26-10-2016 | treasuryXL |

A photo by Matt Duncan. unsplash.com/photos/IUY_3DvM__wA few interesting reports came out in the last couple of weeks: ‘Journeys to Treasury’, ‘Treasury Systems Guide 2016’ and ‘The Future of Treasury Management Systems’. We did some reading and decided we wanted to share these reports with the treasuryXL community. Let us know what you think! Did you see a report, article or something else that could be interesting for the treasuryXL community? Don’t forget to share!

 

Journeys to Treasury – BNP Paribas, EACT, PwC and SAP

In this day and age being a treasurer can be a challenge. BNP Paribas, the European Association of Corporate Treasurers (EACT), PwC and SAP have joined forces to form a thought initiative whose aim is to help finance professionals resolve some of the intricate puzzles that constitute the treasury of today and tomorrow. This resulted in the report: “Journeys to Treasury “.

Journeys to Treasury is a report that bases itself upon the understanding and knowledge of the challenges treasuries face today as well as the ability to anticipate the impact of transforming trends. In Journeys To Treasury, each of the four contributors offers their own expertise gained from their own journeys in this bumpy – yet encouraging – landscape, structured in 3 sections: Continued Innovation, Anytime, Anywhere Treasury and Cybercrime and Fraud.

Interested in reading the full report? You can download ‘Journeys to Treasury’ here.

Treasury Systems Guide 2016 – Bobsguide & GTnews

This bumper edition is full of features and commentary from industry experts, as well as our traditional functionality matrix that delves deep into what different treasury management systems are capable of.

With the recent decision to Brexit and the upcoming US election, it could mean that treasurers might have to sleep with one eye open in order to tackle potential fraud, manage cash visibility and meet regulatory requirements in these uncertain times.

We also look into what’s happening with regulation in Europe, innovation in Asia and tax in the United Kingdom which tie into some of the topics discussed by the bank and the TMS provider we interviewed.

Interested in reading the full report? You can download it here.

The Future of Treasury Management Systems – FX MM

FX-MM brings together leading industry experts to discuss the future of Treasury Management Systems (TMS) and examine how technology is enabling Treasurers to ditch the data gathering and take on a more strategic role within their organisations.

Our panel examines how technology is also helping to democratise the use of TMS, with Software-as-a- Service offerings enabling corporates large and small to enjoy the benefits of the cloud and more user-friendly systems.

Interested in reading the full report? You can download it here.

[separator type=”” size=”” icon=””]

Did you came across something interesting for the treasuryXL community? Or are you interested in becoming a author? Contact us: [email protected]

Blockchain, near real-world projects and collaboration: viable approaches

| 25-10-2016 | Carlo de Meijer |

blockchainIn one of my earlier blogs I wrote that we are beyond the hype of blockchain and distributed ledger technology. Support in the financial industry and beyond for this technology is accelerating in a rapid way. A lot of time and money is now invested into blockchain and its applications.

Distributed ledger technology is set to move out of the test environment and into the wild next year, with nearly two thirds of banks expecting to be in production with full-scale, commercial blockchain projects by 2019”, according to recent research from IBM.

If so, that would mean much earlier than the 2020 to 2025 period that was earlier predicted for mass adoption of blockchain technology.

Collaborative near real-world examples

Financial institutions, technology companies as well as start-ups are increasingly collaborating on projects and pilots (or are planning to do so) to use distributed ledger/blockchain technology in trade finance, payments and securities. Next to existing platforms such as Ripple (payments), there is a growing number of collaborative initiatives including the Distributed Ledger Group (R3CEV) and the Hyper Ledger Project (Linux Foundation) (see earlier blogs). This could really accelerate the whole process towards mass adoption.

The first collaborative near real-world tangible use cases and practical applications of distributed ledgers  in the financial industry are now being brought to the open. And more are expected soon. Here follows a number of interesting examples of actual projects, initiatives and trials. Main question is: will they be viable in the long run?

R3CEV

Credit Suisse (syndicated loans)

Led by Credit Suisse and the bank-backed blockchain consortium R3CEV, a group of seven member banks (BBVA, Danske Bank, Royal Bank of Scotland, Scotiabank, Société Générale, State Street, US Bank and Wells Fargo) and a number of buy-side firms have started a new initiative to apply distributed ledger technology to overhaul “antiquated” and costly manual intervention in the global syndicated loans market. Goal is that in the future, syndicated loan data processing can be done exclusively on the distributed ledger, eliminating the cost for each market participant to maintain its own separate lending system. The Swiss bank is working with Synaps Loans (a joint venture created earlier this year through a partnership between smart contract vendor Symbiont and loan settlement platform provider Ipreo), on a proof-of-concept (PoC) which will run through the end of this year. Through Synaps, loan investors have direct access to an authoritative system of records for syndicated loan data. By connecting a network of agent banks through blockchain, faster and more certain settlements in the syndicated loans market can be achieved. This allows immediate savings by reducing manual reviews, data re-entry and systems reconciliation.

R3CEV and eight member banks (treasury bond trading)

Working under the R3CEV flag, a group of eight member banks have successfully tested a distributed ledger prototype for bond transactions. Thereby they used an implementation of Intel’s proprietary distributed ledger platform, Sawtooth Lake, for the trial. The platform featured advanced smart contract functionality, enabling trading, matching and settlement of US treasury bonds on-chain, as well as automated coupon payments and redemption based on network time and third party data sources. The partners used physical, non-cloud-based nodes hosted across the US, Canada, Asia, Australia and Europe to interact and simulate US treasury trading on the ledger. In addition, the technology enabled an on-chain identity registry to facilitate the permissioning of validators and transactors, and the association of those roles to different organisations. Intel is now donating the bond-related transaction families developed for the trial to the Hyperledger Project.

R3CEV and 15 member banks (Letter of Credit)

R3CEV and 15 of its consortium member banks successfully completed a number of prototypes using distributed ledger technology for trade finance purposes. The involved member banks in the trials (including Barclays, BNP Paribas, Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Danske Bank, ING Bank, Intesa Sanpaolo, Natxis, Nordea, Scotiabank, UBS, UniCredit, US Bank and Wells Fargo), designed and used so-called smart contracts on R3CEV’s Corda distributed ledger platform to process accounts receivable (AR) purchase transactions, invoice financing or factoring, and letter of credit (LC) transactions. Estimates suggest that “such technology has the scope to reduce operational and compliance costs of paper-based trade financing by 10 to 15% and provide a platform for banks to grow revenues by as much as 15%”.

R3CEV and 40 member banks (Commercial Paper trading)

R3CEV and 40 member banks have successfully completed a number of cloud-based ledger experiments. The (then!) 40 member banks were connected to five different R3CEV managed private distributed ledger technologies. Objective was to test, compare and evaluate the strengths and weakness of different blockchain offerings on the market today. The banks thereby modelled a series of smart contracts that were programmed to manage Commercial Paper transactions including facilitate issuance, secondary trading and redemption of Commercial Paper. Each of the distributed ledgers thereby ran a smart contract based on identical business logic to enable the banks to accurately compare the difference in performance between them. These experiments followed a test in January to unite eleven global financial institutions on a private distributed ledger provided by Ethereum.

Barclays and R3CEV (smart contracts repository)

The R3CEV blockchain consortium is working with Barclays Bank, ISDA and legal and academic bodies to explore the development of a repository of master templates for smart contracts when trading and managing securities on distributed and shared ledgers. The new group, has been set up to address the challenges of developing master templates for smart contracts, with an initial focus on how they could be implemented within existing legal and regulatory frameworks. Earlier this year, Barclays Bank demonstrated a Smart Contract Templates prototype creating an ISDA agreement and an interest rate swap trade that then executed as a smart contract on R3CEV’s Corda platform.

Credit Suisse and others (reference data management)

Coordinated by Credit Suisse and working with R3CEV and capital markets tech startup Axoni, seven buy-side and sell-side firms (including Citi and HSBC) have completed a multi-months proof-of-concept (PoC) exercise, which aimed to simplify reference data processes through a distributed ledger prototype. The prototype was created using proprietary distributed ledger software of Axoni (a distributed fintech solutions company) to simulate the collaborative management of reference data, as well as the use of that data for corporate bond issuance. Participants could interact with reference data after issuance, with any proposed changes requiring validation by the underwriter to ensure the ledger provided a single, immutable record of all data related to the bond. The results show how blockchain technology could be used to allow regulators and network participants to view in real time which parties on the ledger have created, issued and proposed amendments to the data record. “This may remove the need to reconcile multiple copies of data and help reduce duplicate reference data costs and improve data latency which will ultimately lower costs and reduce operational risks”, according to Credit Suisse.

Hyperledger Project

UBS and IBM (trade finance)

Swiss bank UBS and IBM  have designed a project that replicates the entire lifecycle of an international trade transaction on Hyperledger`s Fabric blockchain. The trade finance project that is still in its earliest stages and focuses on just a single aspect of the process, combines payment transactions, foreign exchange payments and more, into one single, elaborate smart contract. By programming that process into a smart contract on Hyperledger, UBS “expects to be able to cut the processing time down from seven days to one hour”. Besides the letter of credit process, the project also aims to incorporate the account opening process, to build a user-friendly interface “capable to operate on the go, from a transportation vehicle for example”. It remains unclear how long it will take to complete the international trade project, according to UBS.

CLS (payments netting service)

CLS, the multi-bank foreign exchange counterparty, is to build a payments netting service for trades settled outside the core membership thereby using distributed ledger technology based on the Hyperledger Fabric. CLS wants to use its position to standardise and expand bilateral payment netting capabilities for the entire FX market, eliminating intra-day liquidity demands caused by inefficient “bespoke” approaches to netting throughout the market. The company has signed up 14 banks as early adopters of the proposed service, which will accept FX instructions for six products, including non-deliverable forwards (NDFs), and 24 currencies over existing SWIFT-based channels. Participants will also have the option of connecting directly to the platform via a permissioned distributed ledger, administered by CLS using Hyperledger Fabric. CLS will be working with IBM to build new infrastructure. The new service will be delivered in a phased approach – subject to regulatory approval – beginning with a payment netting service for FX spot, forwards, NDFs, swaps, tomorrow/next day and same-day trades across the 18 currencies CLS currently settles, as well as the Chinese renminbi (offshore), Russian rouble, Polish zloty, Turkish lira, Thai baht and Czech koruna.

Bank of America Merrill Lynch/HSBC (Letter of Credit)

A bank consortium consisting of Bank of America Merrill Lynch, HSBC and the Infocomm Development Authority (IDA) of Singapore successfully applied distributed ledger technology to replace paper-based letters of credit (LCs) in trade finance transactions and streamline global trade. They thereby used the open source Hyperledger Project software for the prototype app, supported by IBM Research and IBM Global Business Services. By sharing information between exporters, importers and their respective banks on a private distributed ledger, this enabled them to execute a trade deal automatically through a series of digital smart contracts. The partners now plan to conduct further testing on the concept’s commercial application with selected partners such as corporates and shippers. Their challenge is to take this from concept to commercial use “making it quicker and easier for businesses to connect with new suppliers and customers at home and abroad.”

BTMU and IBM (contract management and trade finance)

The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ (BTMU) and IBM are collaborating to use blockchain technologies for the design, management and execution of contracts among business partners. They thereby make use of the Hyperledger Project’s open-source platform to automate business transactions with each other on the IBM Cloud. Both partners have built a prototype of smart contracts on a blockchain that should improve the efficiency and accountability of service level agreements in multi-party business interactions. To help improve efficiency, the two will monitor delivery and usage of equipment with a sensor that embeds information into the blockchain. This will then automate invoicing and payment processes between the two companies. BTMU plans to begin using it to manage contracts within their business in fiscal year 2017.

JPX and IBM (post-trade settlement and proxy voting)

Officials of the Japan Exchange Group (JPX) and IBM Japan recently announced advanced plans to test the use of blockchain technology for post-trade settlement and proxy voting. The exchange will investigate how blockchain technology could be used to create new systems for the trading of low-liquidity assets. They thereby will use the framework provided by the Hyper Ledger Project. JPX is also working with Nomura Research Institute (NRI) and several major financial institutions (including SBI Securities, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group and blockchain specialist Currency Port) to test the use of blockchain technology for future applications across the securities industry. Until the end of June, the partners have examined various business scenarios and validation items involving distributed ledger technology and prepare prototype systems based on those scenarios.

Credit Mutuel Arkea (verify customer IDs)

Credit Mutuel Arkea has completed a pilot of an operational permissioned blockchain network to verify customer “bona fides” in compliance with Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements. Using the open-source Hyperledger Project fabric, the software “tapped into all valid existing evidence” already stored in the bank’s multiple systems of record such as from mortgage applications or life insurance enrolment and bank accounts opening. Following the success of the initial pilot, Credit Mutual Arkea plans to work with IBM to integrate the different silos of customer data across the bank to create a single ID data chain that can be used across all business processes.

Ripple

The Ripple network recently announced that seven banks including Santander, CIBC, UniCredit, UBS, ReiseBank, National Bank of Abu Dhabi and ATB Financial of Edmonton “had made a breakthrough by being among the first financial institutions in the world to move real money across borders using blockchain-based distributed ledger technology provided  by Ripple”. Focus is thereby on international, low-value, high-volume and velocity payments (as these can often be expensive and not profitable for banks). The seven banks are all planning to deploy Ripple commercially, while most having already moved real money via the network.

In the meantime Ripple has signed up several major banks to a steering group on the use of distributed financial technology for global payments (including names like: Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Santander, UniCredit, Standard Chartered, Westpac, and Royal Bank of Canada). The creation of the  Global Payments Steering Group (GPSG), is significant because this represents the first time that major banks have formulated policies to govern the transfer of money across borders using blockchain. The group will oversee the creation and maintenance of Ripple payment transaction rules, formalised standards for activity using Ripple, and other actions to support the implementation of Ripple payment capabilities. This Group might become a great competitor for SWIFT.

Standard Chartered (trade finance)

The first bank-developed blockchain platform for trade finance was the product of a partnership between Standard Chartered, the Development Bank of Singapore (DBS) and the Infocomm Development Authority of Singapore (IDA), the government’s IT and communications arm. They developed a blockchain-based invoice trading platform (code-named TradeSafe) that uses the distributed ledger technology developed by Ripple. Invoices and bills of ladings are allocated unique identifiers and stored on this distributed ledger. The use of unique identifiers enables users to view the status of a particular invoice/bill, but also reduces the risk of duplicate financing of the same invoice/bill. Further, to maintain confidentiality, users are allocated encrypted identities.

ATB Financial and Reisebank (international interbank payment)

SAP (the world’s third largest independent software manufacturer), partnered with Ripple and two banks, ATB Financial (Canada) and Reisebank (Germany), to demonstrate how banks can improve the efficiency of cross-border payments by using blockchain technology. For that SAP and Ripple designed and built a proof-of-concept (PoC) prototype based on this technology (thereby connecting SAP HANA Cloud, the open platform as a service (SaaS), and the SAP Payment Engine application, which centralizes payment processing in one solution with Ripple’s network of enterprise blockchain solutions).

This prototype was used to send the first international interbank blockchain payment of CAD $ 1,000 from ATB Financial to Reisebank. With parties representing different continents, this cross border payment transfer using blockchain technology was completed successfully. The payment which would normally have taken between two to six business days to process “was now completed in around 20 seconds, so nearly instantaneous”. In addition for being far quicker, this blockchain payment transaction cost a fraction of current transaction rates.

Japanese bank consortium (real-time settlement and domestic fund transfers)

A consortium of 15 Japanese banks are to work with blockchain joint venture SBI Ripple Asia, to build a new payments platform for 24 hours real-time settlement and domestic fund transfers, thereby using Ripple’s blockchain technology. This should firmly reduce the fees currently paid by banks for performing cross-border transactions and pave the way for the arrival of real-time domestic and cross-border payments. Initial participants include Bank of Yokohama and SBI Sumishin Net Bank (SBI Holdings owns part of it). It is expected that the size of the consortium will increase to 30 banks, and that the new service will go live in Spring 2017.

Santander (cross border payments)

Santander has become the first major UK bank (and the first bank in the world) to use Ripple for cross border payments. Starting in May Santander has begun piloting a Ripple-powered payments app built on the blockchain technology, that facilitates international payments. The app, currently being tested by bank staffers, connects to Apple Pay, and allows cross-border payments to be made between GBP 10 and GBP 10.000, around the clock and at any time of the day, using Touch ID. Funds appear in the recipient’s account the next working day. These transfers can be made from sterling to euros and US dollars (currently payments made in euros can be sent to 21 countries and US dollar payments to America only). The results of this trial will be used to assess whether to bring this technology to its customer base at a later date.

Foundational challenges

When it comes to blockchain, we may say that we are beyond the hype. The many experiments, proof of concepts and other real-world trials with blockchain technology are all evidence of that. And we will see many more of them this year and beyond. But quoting Terry Roche of Tabb Group in a recent blog the technology now needs to deliver real-world benefits.

While blockchain’s promises remain bright, however, there are (still) numerous foundational challenges (process, technical, community, etc.) that the financial services industry needs to overcome to get a beneficial blockchain world.

While all these projects ask a lot of investments, not all of them may prove to be viable in the end. The financial industry however has no endless funds available to explore endless options.  In today’s constrained technology marketplace, there needs to be a defined and realizable gain associated with any project for firms to fund it. That is why the industry should prevent dead-end options and only focus on viable applications that have a long-term future and suits best in their business model!

 

carlodemeijer

 

Carlo de Meijer

Economist and researcher

 

Efficiency, kostenbesparing en cash vrijmaken door werkkapitaal optimalisatie

| 24-10-2016 | Olivier Werlingshoff |

werkkapitaal2

 

In een artikel las ik vorige week dat er binnen bedrijven weinig animo is voor cashmanagement en de optimalisatie hiervan. Reden dat wordt aangedragen is dat cashmanagement niet als sexy wordt ervaren binnen organisaties. De vraag is vervolgens waarom? Er kunnen behoorlijk veel efficiency slagen worden gerealiseerd op dit vlak maar ook keiharde kosten verlagingen. Daarnaast kan een goed cashmanagement helpen om meer inzage te krijgen in je werkkapitaal. Dit laatste heeft als voordeel dat de knoppen waaraan je kunt draaien om je werkkapitaal te optimaliseren beter zichtbaar en herkenbaar worden.

Mogelijk is de reden dat omdat cashmanagement verweven is met verschillende afdelingen het moeilijk is om verbeteringen te herkennen en aanpassingen door te voeren. Voornamelijk binnen de mid-corporate bedrijven, bedrijven met een omzet tot +- 500 miljoen omzet, zijn er wel degelijk snel efficiency slagen en kostenbesparingen door te voeren. Aan de hand van een paar voorbeelden wil ik een tipje van de sluier oplichten.

Cashmanagement bestaat uit betalingsverkeer, liquiditeitenbeheer en werkkapitaal beheer. Een paar simpele voorbeelden waar efficiencyslagen zijn te behalen:

  • Automatisch reconciliëren van bankmutaties in ERP systemen. Het lijkt een open deur maar je zult versteld staan hoeveel handmatige boekingen er nog worden uitgevoerd.
  • Door de bankencrisis hebben bedrijven hun gelden verspreid over verschillende banken. Risicomanagement technisch een goede zet maar om een goed beeld te hebben van je cash positie heb je veel banksystemen nodig met de bijbehorende tokens. Door het aantal banken te verminderen heb je sneller een beter zicht. Maar mocht je de verschillende banken toch willen aanhouden dan zijn er systemen op de markt te verkrijgen waarmee alle banken aangestuurd kunnen worden. Voordelen zijn met één inlog zicht op je totale cash positie. Daarnaast hoef je bij het autoriseren van betalingen niet verschillende systemen te gebruiken.
  • Heel veel bedrijven gebruiken nog steeds papieren afschriften. Vaak worden ze ook dagelijks ontvangen en gearchiveerd. Efficiency is te realiseren door de afschriften vanuit het banksysteem digitaal op te slaan. Naast ruimte besparing is ook het zoeken naar mutaties eenvoudiger.
  • Door éénmaal per week betalingen uit te voeren bespaar je tijd en kun je toch dagelijks betalen door een betaaldag te selecteren in de batches. Wanneer je een autorisatiescheiding hebt waarbij als voorbeeld controllers betalingen moeten goedkeuren, kunnen ze hier standaard tijd voor reserveren.
  • Wanneer je vaak liquiditeiten op deposito’s stalt of vreemde valuta aankoopt is het handig om jaarlijks een vaste spread met je bank af te spreken. Hierdoor voorkom je dat je telkens moet gaan onderhandelen over een goede rente of een scherpe koers.

Bovenstaande zaken zijn voorbeelden die vaak vanzelfsprekend zijn maar niet binnen elke organisatie worden uitgevoerd. Om hierachter te komen kun je het best op de afdeling gaan zitten en stuk voor stuk samen met de betreffende medewerker de verschillende processen doornemen. Het afpellen van de processen. Dit kan worden gezien als een soort “Big Brother is watching you”. Door hiervoor de tijd te nemen, je op de afdeling in te burgeren vaak te communiceren en de medewerkers te betrekken bij de aanbevelingen kun je dit gevoel verminderen.

In een volgend stuk wil ik voorbeelden aangeven van kostenreductie en hoe je door cash awareness binnen organisatie te promoten, cash kan vrijmaken.

WERFIAD biedt diensten aan waarbij samen met medewerkers op de werkvloer wordt gekeken en gezocht naar processen die efficiënter kunnen worden ingericht. Afspraken over “no cure no pay” of het aanbieden van een korting op de eerste 20 consultancy uren kunnen een drempel wegnemen om een eerste start te maken met het optimaliseringsproces. Is je interesse gewekt en wil je meer weten, ik ben bereikbaar op 06-83629427 of neem een kijkje op www.werfiad.eu

Olivier Werlingshoff - editor treasuryXL

 

Olivier Werlingshoff

Managing Consultant at Proferus

treasuryXL education & events

| 21-10-2016 | treasuryXL |

educationeventstreasuryxlAutumn has come and it’s time to visit events, expand your network and try to learn some new things to start the working season right. We have selected some events and education programmes of which we think you would appreciate them. Enjoy and don’t forget to let us know which events you have been visiting or education programmes you have been following. We are curious to hear your opinion on them!

2 -11 | Best Practice Evening, Zurich @ TIS

Trade ideas and network with other treasury, shared services and IT peers from all industries during their networking sessions. Learn about the New Payment System Switzerland and listen to the TIS Story – Managing Corporate Payments, Liquidity and Bank Relationships in the Cloud. Read more.

07-11 | Masterclass Treasury Accounting @ Improfin groep

Deze praktische masterclass beoogt deelnemers een gedegen verdieping te bieden in de verslaggeving rond financiële instrumenten. Op basis van deze verdieping zijn zij niet alleen in staat om de treasury administratie optimaal in te richten maar ook om een kritische dialoog met onder meer intern- en extern accountants te voeren. Lees verder.

10&11-11 | Treasury beurs 2016 @ DACT

Op de Beurs verstrekken de belangrijkste aanbieders op treasurygebied informatie over diensten, technieken, informatiesystemen, financiële producten en carrièreplanning. Een bezoek aan de verschillende stands geeft u een goed beeld van wat er in de markt speelt en biedt u tevens de mogelijkheid de leveranciers met elkaar te vergelijken. Ook dit jaar hebben de standhouders weer verrassende activiteiten en gadgets te bieden. Lees verder.

[separator type=”” size=”” icon=””]

Uitgelicht: Tobintaks

| 20-10-2016 | Lionel Pavey |

robintaks-lionelpaveyDe Europese Commissie heeft van tien lidstaten de opdracht gekregen om voor het eind van het jaar een richtlijn voor de Europese Tobintaks op te stellen. Oostenrijk, België, Frankrijk, Duitsland, Griekenland, Italië, Portugal, Slowakije, Slovenië en Spanje zijn het op 10 oktober eens geworden, de Europese versie van de transactie belasting gaat er komen. We vroegen Lionel Pavey wat hij hiervan denkt.

De tobintaks of financiële transactietaks (FTT) is een kleine belasting op valutatransacties, die in 1971 naar aanleiding van het de facto afschaffen van het systeem van Bretton Woods, door de Amerikaanse econoom en Nobelprijswinnaar James Tobin werd voorgesteld.

Welke financieel producten zijn belastbaar – valuta, obligaties, aandelen, derivaten? En wat is het doel van de Tobintaks – inkomst genereren of speculatieve handel verminderen? Denk hier aan flitshandel.

Waar gaan de opbrengsten naar toe? BIS onderzoek (2016) ziet een dagelijkse omzet voor valutatransacties van USD 5 biljoen. Meer dan 75% van deze handel is buiten de Europese Unie: Verenigd Koninkrijk, Verenigde Staten, Japan, Singapore en Hong Kong. Allemaal dus buiten beschouwing van de Tobintaks.

Met een belasting van 0.01% (omgerekend 1 pip op een valutatransactie) wordt een opbrengst gegenereerd van maximaal EUR 30 Miljard. De handel zal zich echter ook verplaatsen naar landen waar geen belasting is (weer Verenigd Koninkrijk in Europa) – dus nog minder opbrengst.

Ook zal er minder liquiditeit zijn in de markt waardoor het moeilijker wordt om een transactie te sluiten. Moet er een verschil zijn tussen een speculatieve transactie en een “hedging” transactie?

Er zijn, voorlopig, meer vragen dan antwoorden.

Lionel Pavey

 

Lionel Pavey

Cash Management and Treasury Specialist – Flex Treasurer

 

 

 

Accountability foreign currency risks

| 19-10-2016 | Maarten Verheul |

cffc

Sometimes in financial statements, I read that the income statement was negatively impacted by exchange losses. This seems unnecessary to me.

At the conclusion of each and every purchase order sales in foreign currency is a currency forward contract entered to avoid foreign exchange risks. Apparently, often to run the risk in the hope of some extra foreign currency earnings. Well, I can be brief about that. Your business is to sell your product or your service. Or, as they also say, “Every man to you.”

So, whose responsibility is it, that foreign currency is covered with a foreign currency forward contract? I say this is the responsibility of the Treasury department. Treasury should report this, at least to the management. If management decides that it is not covered, it will be their responsibility.

I even think that the Treasury department should report every single time. It may be that management decides not to do the act, because the risk is limited, but the next time the risk may be much greater.

The best scenario is when the management wants to exclude all risks with foreign currency and treasury delegates to hedge all transactions, buying and selling foreign currency forward exchange contracts. Then, there never is a doubt about what needs to be done and you won’t lose time consulting with management or directors.

[separator type=”” size=”” icon=””]

maartenverheultxlMaarten Verheul – Treasury Consultant

[button url=”https://www.treasuryxl.com/community/experts/maarten-verheul” text=”View expert profile” size=”” type=”primary” icon=”” external=”1″]

FX volatility creates opportunities

currencies| 18-10-2016 | Victor Macrae |

The British pound has strongly decreased in value against other major currencies such as the US dollar and the euro. Such FX movements can negatively impact firms’ financial statements and destroy firm value. On the other hand, they can also create opportunities. I would like to demonstrate this on the basis of a real case of a European based industrial firm which has the euro as functional currency. We’ll discuss two scenarios.

First, some time ago the firm was negotiating a takeover of a British firm. In anticipation of the M&A transaction it purchased British pounds against euros. However, the deal was unexpectedly cancelled. As a result the firm had to sell the pounds again. Luckily, the pound had strengthened against the euro in the meantime and the firm ‘gained’ millions due to the failed acquisition. This could however easily have been a ‘loss’ in case of a weakening of the pound. The ‘no FX strategy’ was in the firm’s favour this time, but I wouldn’t bet on it.
If you are thinking about a takeover in the UK (or any other country where the local currency is under pressure) it is wise to consider multiple FX hedging strategies. For instance, using options for these type of transactions not only provides you with a way out if the acquisition is not closed as an option gives you the right but not the obligation to purchase the FX. Furthermore, when the payment is due it also gives you the opportunity to buy the currency at the option’s strike price or at the lower prevailing market rate if the case.

Second, a characteristic of this industrial firm is that it is very dominant in its core markets. Due to this position, the firm predominantly sells its products in euro, also to customers with a different home currency. While it may seem that there is no FX risk, this strategy has led to currency issues, for instance in the Russian market. Due to the weakening of the Russian rouble against the euro, the firm’s products have become more expensive up to a point where sales in Russia have nearly ceased to exist. Russian customers cannot afford to pay the euro prices and demand pricing in roubles or a discount on the euro price.
This is an example where a firm’s exchange rate policy influences its core business activities. A solution could be to move production to Russia, and possibly to produce for other regions as well, although this has consequences far beyond the FX issue which have to be taken into account.

Both examples show that FX volatility can create opportunities. FX risk management should support the core activities of a firm and not the other way around. But if creative FX management helps create firm value, why not benefit?

 

Victor Macrae

 

Victor Macrae

Owner of Macrae Finance

 

 

Blockchain and Hyperledger Hackfest: from another planet

| 17-10-2016 | Carlo de Meijer |

blockchainLast week I was invited to attend a Hyperledger Hackfest at ABN AMRO in Amsterdam. This event organized by the Hyperledger Fab led by IBM took place in the rooms of the bank’s new Innovation Lab, an ultra-modern environment. Certainly the right place for such a happening. Technical specialists and architects from companies and organisations all over the world from China to Japan and the US as well as Europe were participating.  

From another planet

For me as a ‘normal’ economist who thought to know a lot about blockchain and distributed  ledger technology, trying to bridge the gap between this technology and the financial world, this was sometimes different (and difficult) stuff. Just as if I was on another planet. But for many of them the other way around may also be true. The present financial world is often a complex one for these technical people. To realise that this technology should fit in this financial world they also need to understand what is happening there in other to bridge their gap. That means we should learn from each other in order to get the best of both worlds.

Blockchain platform Iroha

I have learned a lot at this event. But for this blog I like to restrict myself to an interesting offering that is a real example of such a cross-disciplinary research approach: the Japanese blockchain platform Iroha. One of the speakers from the Japanese fintech Soramitsu, was just returning from the Geneva SIBOS event where he had announced the open sourcing  and proposal of a blockchain network called Iroha to the Hyperledger Project (see my earlier blog about Hyperledger Project). Once the proposal is accepted by the Hyperledger Project and its members, Soramitsu will be able to collaborate with a wider range of partners and corporations in testing the network and finding easier methods in deploying blockchain networks to private companies.

What is Iroha?

Iroha, jointly sponsored by leading Japanese technology firms, including NTT DATA Corporation, is a distributed ledger technology and smart contract platform using Java-based smart contracts and a Byzantine Fault Tolerant consensus algorithm, called Sumeragi. This network is adapted from the Hyperledger Fabric architecture, with plans for greater interoperability in the future

Soramitsu intends to increase the availability of smart contract enabled networks to open opportunities for companies in using the blockchain technology. Iroha is expected to provide private businesses, financial institutions and organization with a simple blockchain architecture that is easy to understand, develop, and integrate. That will enable businesses of any size to implement its network with substantially lower costs, as well as run smart contract-based applications with improved security measures.

All of Soremitsu’s partnering institutions and research firms will support the development of Iroha, by running experiments on Iroha’s local currencies and the network’s overall efficiency.

Expected use cases for the Iroha blockchain network include: Payment and Settlement, Contract management, Securities clearing, Development of financial products such as Insurance, Supply Chain Management, Smart Grid, Trade finance, and Internet of Things (IoT), and efficient compliance with Know Your Customers (KYC) regulations.

Soramitsu collaborative approach

Soramitsu, started in February 2016, and a member of the Hyperledger Project, currently oversees various research projects and developments with Japan’s leading research institutions, technology and financial firms.

Weather derivatives

The company’s Iroha project can be implemented outside the realm of finance. Recently, Soramitsu began the development of derivative insurance contracts using blockchain technology, such as weather derivatives, together with the Japanese insurance company Sompo Japan Nipponkoa Holdings.

KYC

In addition, the company is working with Rakuten Securities to develop a Know Your Customer (KYC) using blockchain technology. They are now looking for global KYC partners.

Smart currencies

Soramitsu has also created a new joint research project with The University of Tokyo, The University of Aizu, and the Center for Global Communications (GLOCOM) of the International University of Japan to study the creation of local currencies running on blockchain and distributed ledger technology (Iroha network), so-called ‘smart currency”, and their  effects on regional development. This project will focus on the area around Aizu, in Fukushima Prefecture, Japan.

Thereby the University of Tokyo and its Interfaculty Initiative in Information Studies, Professor Hideyuki Tanaka researched the effects of network economics and information technology (IT). The University of Aizu OpenAppLab and regional technology center looked into the relationships of local smart currencies to solve regional problems. Lastly, GLOCOM, who founded the Blockchain Economics Research Lab back in March 2016, focused its efforts on socio-economic systems and the impact of distributed ledger technology.

Blockchain and cross-disciplinary approach

What may we learn from this? Intensive collaboration between the financial and the technology world is a must. This in order to meet the needs of both worlds. The Hyperledger Project is already a platform where all these disciplines come together. Given its open-source approach this gives the best guarantee to make further progress. It is no up to the regulators to make that a reality!

Funding Planning & Execution with your Bank, a Consultant, an Interim Manager or DIY?

| 14-10-2016 | Pieter de Kiewit |

fundingIn my work as a treasury recruiter I speak with financial managers on a regular basis about their funding. Both in the funding strategy as in the execution hereof, it can be noticed that entrepreneurs and their CFO’s intensify their search for the proper partner. This is what I hear so far:

Funding has been the primary trade of the bank, they do have wide and broad knowledge. Over the last years they have lost their credibility due to scandals, but also because they did not supply when the need was high. The banks themselves also struggle with increased regulation and are trying to adjust their business model to changing market circumstances. Can the advice of a supplier be fully objective?

The objectivity of consultants depends upon their business model. There is a portion that is on the broker side that is paid upon success, either by the supplier or their client. They will be deal driven and will not only have the interest of the client in focus. At the same time, without them quite often, there will be no deal, no funding. The consultants that are paid a fixed fee or hourly rate can be expected to be more impartial. They often have the knowledge base, but will not take responsibility. Also their rate can be steep.

The third solution is an interim manager who has been responsible for funding in the past. Often his rate is more acceptable and he will better speak the language of the entrepreneur. Also he is an obvious candidate to do much of the operational work. Of course he will not have an organisation to fall back upon and will not accept any liability. I notice interim managers are getting a bigger market share.

Finally a CFO and entrepreneur can do the funding planning and execution themselves. At first glance this may be the cheapest option.

What questions did you ask before funding your company? Who did you chose to accompany you?

Cost, expertise, success, liability, gut feeling….. So many variables, no easy answer. I look forward to your input.

Pieter de Kiewit

 

 

Pieter de Kiewit
Owner Treasurer Search