EuroFinance International Treasury Management returns to Vienna | 21-23 September 2022

08-04-2022 | Eurofinance | treasuryXL |

 

Featuring keynote speakers, Guy Verhofstadt and Göran Carstedt…

The 31st annual EuroFinance International Treasury Management 2022 will return this September with more than 2,000 attendees, 150 speakers, 100 sponsors and exhibitors.

 

 

For the first in-person event in three years, EuroFinance International Treasury Management keynote speakers will include Guy Verhofstadt, member of the European Parliament and Göran Carstedt, former corporate executive of Volvo and IKEA.

The full line-up brings more than 150 global corporate treasury leaders, financial institutions, technology providers and thought-leaders together to discuss the theme “Treasury in transition”, across 12 stages at Vienna’s Messe Wien Exhibition Congress Center from September 21st-23rd 2022.

Guy Verhofstadt is a Member of the European Parliament and co-chair of the Conference on the Future of Europe. He served as prime minister of Belgium from 1999 until 2008 and also made a name for himself as Brexit coordinator and as a passionate champion of more European integration. He will give the opening keynote on day 1.

Dr Göran Carstedt is the former head of IKEA North America and IKEA Retail Europe and former head of VOLVO France and Volvo Sweden. Having run some of the world’s leading companies, Dr Carstedt is also the former senior director of President Clinton’s Climate Change Initiative. He will give the opening keynote presentation on day 2 on how climate change is changing business.

Corporate treasury leaders from some of the world’s top multinationals – including TechnipFMC, Citrix Systems, Kongsberg Automotive, Autoneum, Equinor, Heinz, Medtronic, John Lewis – have also been confirmed.

 

“We look forward to seeing people connecting and collaborating face-to-face once again in Vienna. It’s great to see live events bouncing back across the world and from the response we have had so far,  it’s clear that our community of speakers, banks and technology providers are eager to meet in-person after 2 years of virtual meetings.” says Asif Chaudhury, Managing Director of EuroFinance.

 

Irreversibly changed after the events of the past few years, this year’s theme will explore the “new” treasury; a highly digital and automated function tasked with meeting strategic goals and changing remits against a backdrop of multiple issues from climate change to high inflation. Treasurers will share their experience in practical case studies and technical discovery labs and celebrate the innovations that will drive change.

EuroFinance’s growing list of sponsors and exhibitors for the event includes  J.P. Morgan Chase, Standard Chartered, Citi, Bank of America, BNP Paribas,, Fitch Group, HSBC, Santander Corporate & Investment Banking, Visa, Société Générale, ION, TIS, Remote Technology, B2C2, American Express, Bayerische Landesbank, UniCredit, PrimeRevenue, Northern Trust Asset Management, Credit Agricole, Zanders, ICD, Pictet Asset Management, Raiffeisen Bank, BlackRock, Legal and General, Tietoevry, Amundi, CMSpi, Nomentia, Aviva Investors Global Services, CashAnalytics, Treasury Systems, CoCoNet, Exalog, Traxpay, SisID, Finastra.

For more information and to register, visit: https://www.eurofinance.com/international

About EuroFinance

EuroFinance, part of The Economist Group, is a leading global provider of treasury, cash management and risk events, research and training. With over 30 years of experience, our mission is to bring together the brightest minds and most influential voices in treasury. Through in-depth research with 1,000 corporate treasury professionals every year, we have a unique insight into the trends and developments within the profession and an unrivalled global viewpoint.

Contacts

Marianne Ford
Senior Marketing Manager
EuroFinance

Economist Impact
[email protected]

 

 

Insurance within Treasury

07-04-2022 | treasuryXL | ComplexCountries | LinkedIn |

After many years of weak markets and low insurance premiums, many companies have probably been buying more cover than they may really need. A market where premiums are rising is causing companies to re-evaluate their approach. This re-evaluation involves many complex questions around risk appetite, collaboration with other functions (Legal, HR, Logistics, Manufacturing, IT), the use of brokers, tax, and others. This gives the treasurer the opportunity to really demonstrate his or her value to the business.

This report was compiled by Monie Lindsey. based on a Treasury Peer Call chaired by Damian Glendinning.

Source

Chair’s Overview

The strategic treasurer. The risk manager for the company. Where better for the treasurer to get out of the traditional disciplines of simply managing liquidity and bank accounts, than in managing insurance? Risk management meets budget and operational constraints, and it is a very financial discipline.

This call was initiated by a member who is struggling with increasing premiums as the market hardens, and wanted to know whether other treasurers who are responsible for insurance are taking the same measures, i.e., reducing the purchase of cover and increasing deductibles. The quick answer to that question is yes, in response to significant premium increases, many members are taking another look at the levels of cover. The other question was whether there are additional, more creative ideas.

This triggered a wide-ranging discussion:

  • Should insurance be in treasury? The consensus – not surprisingly – was yes, but responsibility often lies with, or is shared with, legal and HR.
  • How useful are captives? One member finds them useful to accelerate the tax deduction for losses. Others find them useful for centralising risk and losses away from the operating units – this can depend on the company’s management system. Others are wary of the cost and complexity of a captive.
  • Should you use brokers? If so, how effective are RFPs between brokers? One member made savings by changing brokers following an RFP. One member does some negotiating directly with the insurers – but this can be heavy lifting.
  • What is the correct balance between self-insurance and buying risk? There does not seem to be a scientific answer.
  • The classical approach to solving this question is to benchmark versus what other companies are buying – but this does not confirm that this is the correct level for your company.
  • Part of the equation is determining the level of risk and earnings volatility a company is prepared to accept.
  • A company will have different levels of risk retention for different lines of risk
  • Some risks can become very difficult to insure: one participant is having big issues with theft of cargo in the port of Los Angeles, with the activity of organised crime. This is a frequent issue in Latin America.
  • Several participants felt one of the benefits of buying insurance was access to expert advice on risk management, leading to better protected facilities, e.g., better fire prevention, and enhanced anti-theft measures.
  • The use of captives to self-insure HR benefits was raised. This is possible, and can be done easily for some benefits. However, it is an area which is heavily regulated, with many mandatory state run schemes, especially in Europe.
  • On the other hand, travel insurance can often be combined with useful services, such as emergency assistance.
  • There was a discussion about cyber insurance: one participant had experienced a hack, and found that the insurance company provided outstanding assistance in managing the situation before it got out of control. Others were less sure the risk was significant enough to justify the expense.
  • Changes to the business often bring changes to the insurance cover required.

Bottom line: After many years of weak markets and low insurance premiums, many companies have probably been buying more cover than they may really need. A market where premiums are rising is causing companies to re-evaluate their approach.

This re-evaluation involves many complex questions around risk appetite, collaboration with other functions (Legal, HR, Logistics, Manufacturing, IT), the use of brokers, tax, and others. This gives the treasurer the opportunity to really demonstrate his or her value to the business.

Please get in touch to sign up for free updates, request a sample report, or find out about our services. Enquire

Treasury RFP’s digitization

06-04-2022 | treasuryXL | Treasury Delta | LinkedIn | The optimal, objective, and transparent selection of treasury supplier solutions and/or banking services, observing procurement principles and guidelines, remains a complicated challenge for all treasurers. It is extremely time-consuming and cost-ineffective. This article highlights a niche fintech solution developed by Treasury Delta to successfully digitize the […]

Read more

The LIBOR transition is far from over

05-04-2022 | treasuryXL | Refinitiv | LinkedIn |

In December 2021, LIBOR setting publication ceased on over two dozen settings. But the transition is far from over as phasing out continues for legacy contracts.

Source

  1. As of the end of last year, 24 LIBOR settings have ceased publication.
  2. The FCA confirmed Synthetic LIBOR to be allowed for the temporary use of “synthetic” sterling and yen 1M, 3M and 6M LIBOR rates in all legacy LIBOR contracts.
  3. The main challenge that remains is the USD LIBOR Transition

For more data-driven insights in your Inbox, subscribe to the Refinitiv Perspectives weekly newsletter.

Since the end of 2021, publication of 24 LIBOR settings has stopped (CHF, EUR, GBP, USD and JPY) and the most used GBP and JPY LIBORS are now being published with a new methodology called “synthetic LIBOR”.

USD LIBORs will continue to be published until mid-2023 using panel bank submissions. Discussions surrounding Euribor are ongoing, but EU regulators appear to be waiting until the LIBOR cessation has fully taken place to define a more detailed agenda for Euribor.

To sum it up – the LIBOR transition is not yet over!

Refinitiv Eikon gives you the information you need – whenever and however you want it

What is Synthetic LIBOR?

On 16 November 2021, the FCA confirmed Synthetic LIBOR to be allowed for the temporary use of “synthetic” sterling and yen 1M, 3M and 6M LIBOR rates in all legacy LIBOR contracts.

This applied to all other than cleared derivatives, that have not been changed at or before 31 December 2021.

The Synthetic LIBOR are published on existing Refinitiv Instrument Codes (RICS), as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Refinitiv Eikon LIBOR= quote. The LIBOR transition is far from over
Figure 1: Refinitiv Eikon LIBOR= quote

Synthetic LIBOR methodology

Synthetic LIBOR = ISDA Median Spread + Term Rate.

For example, the JPY 3M Synthetic LIBOR value published on JPY3MFSR= RIC is calculated as per below:

JPY3MFSR=; -0.00020630 = JPY 3M ISDA IBOR Spread (JPY3MFSRS=ISDA ; 0.0000835) + [JPY 3M term rate (JPYTRR3M=QCKJ ; -0.0002938) x (360/365) ; -0.000289775]

*Please note that Refinitiv is an authorised distributor of ISDA spreads. You can find ISDA fallbacks and Term Rates in the Refinitiv Eikon IBOR App.

Figure 2: Refinitiv Eikon JPY 3M IBOR FALLBACK RATE. The LIBOR transition is far from over
Figure 2: Refinitiv Eikon JPY 3M IBOR FALLBACK RATE
Figure 3: Refinitiv Eikon JPY 3M TERM RATE
Figure 3: Refinitiv Eikon JPY 3M TERM RATE

USD LIBOR challenges

The main challenge that remains is the USD LIBOR transition. Even with the cessation set to 30 June 2023, market participants have been asked to implement transition and identify fallbacks by regulators.

Even if the use of USD LIBORs has been discouraged and drastically limited for new contracts, data from DTCC and ISDA suggests that LIBOR contracts were traded in January 2022 but in low volumes.

The FCA defined clearly the stipulations in Further Provision and Information in relation to the Prohibition and the Exceptions:

  • The market-making exception applies only where market-making is undertaken in response to a request by a client seeking to reduce or hedge their USD LIBOR exposure on contracts entered before 1 January 2022.
  • The prohibition does not prohibit new single currency USD LIBOR basis swaps entered in the interdealer broker market.

The lack of credit component in SOFR appears to raise some issues, mostly from regional banks, that also stressed the fact that borrowers will struggle with SOFR. LIBOR is a forward-looking term rate and interests are known upfront, with SOFR and other alternative Risk-Free Rates (RFR), interest is compounded and only known at the end of the period.

*Please note that credit-sensitive rates such as Ameribor, AXI or BSBY are available in Refinitiv Eikon but are NOT endorsed by the ARCC or FCA.

On the cash market, the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (ARRC) Progress Report, published on 31 March 2021, estimated there will be approximately $5trn USD LIBOR referencing contracts in business loans, consumer loans, bonds and securitisations maturing after June 2023.

Many of these exposures may have suitable fallback language and will be able to transition away from LIBOR prior to cessation.

ARRC has selected Refinitiv to publish its recommended spread adjustments and spread adjusted rates for cash products. The USD IBOR Cash Fallbacks provide market participants, including lenders and borrowers, with an industry-standard agreed rate, which can clearly and easily be referenced in contracts.

Refinitiv launched USD IBOR Consumer Cash Fallbacks 1-week and 2-month settings on 3 January 2022.

Figure 4 : Refinitiv Eikon IBOR App, USD IBOR CASH FALLBACKS
Figure 4: Refinitiv Eikon IBOR App, USD IBOR CASH FALLBACKS

Update on derivatives

As mentioned in the December 2021 Bank of England Risk-Free Rate Working group newsletter, the transition towards Risk-Free Rates is progressing steadily, as per the charts in Figure 5 for cleared swaps and exchange-traded futures:

Figure 5: Cleared Swaps and Exchange Traded Futures
Figure 5: Cleared Swaps and Exchange Traded Futures

In a Risk.net article, Philip Whitehurst, Head of Service Development, Rates at LCH (part of LEG Group) said: “Sterling LIBOR was the most substantial population LCH had converted, amounting to about 185,000 trades for around $15trn worth of cleared swaps. They were converted into Sterling Overnight Index Average (SONIA) equivalents on a compensated basis.

“The same was applicable for around 75,000 yen LIBOR trades, with aggregate notional of about $4.5trn, and 25,000 to 30,000 Swiss LIBOR trades worth about $1.5trn, as well as a very small population of euro LIBOR trades.”

Whitehurst stressed that Euribor trades were not converted.

On the OTC Derivatives markets, the adoption of new Risk-Free Rates is very high.

GBP, CHF and JPY swaps are now exclusively done on new Risk-Free Rates. SOFR swaps are progressing versus LIBOR, at a quite slow pace, and now represent close to 50 percent of the traded notionals, according to ISDA swaps info figures.

Unsurprisingly, the exception remains EUR, where fewer than 30 percent of the traded notionals are on €STR.

Cross-currency swap markets are rapidly ditching legacy interest rate benchmarks in favour of RFRs.

Since the beginning of 2022, trades in euro/dollar cross-currency OTC swaps have almost exclusively referenced the secured overnight financing rate (SOFR) and the euro short-term rate (€STR).

DTCC data repositories from U.S. markets data show how 95 percent of USD / GBP, USD / JPY and USD / CHF now trade RFR versus RFR.

The transition has been pushed by RFR First initiatives, the second phase of SOFR First, launched in September 2021. It stated that interdealer trading conventions for cross-currency basis swaps between USD, JPY, GBP, and CHF LIBORs will move to each currency’s risk-free rates.

Cross-currency swaps prices can be found in Refinitiv Eikon, using the OTC advanced search tool, the OTC Pricer App and the Swap Pricer app, which now allow price cross-currency swaps based on new RFRs.

Figure 6: Refinitiv Eikon Advanced Sear tools for OTC Derivatives
Figure 6: Refinitiv Eikon Advanced Sear tools for OTC Derivatives
Figure 8: Refinitiv Eikon Swap Pricer App, Cross currency swap pricing
Figure 7: Refinitiv Eikon Swap Pricer App, Cross-currency swap pricing

Not the end of the LIBOR transition

Although 24 LIBOR settings have already been discontinued, this does not spell the end of the LIBOR transition.

Market participants are still actively transitioning away from LIBOR trades in USD, while getting prepared for other IBORs transitions in the Eurozone and the rest of the world.

Refinitiv Eikon gives you the information you need – whenever and however you want it

 

Robotic Process Automation – the Do’s & Don’ts

29-03-2022 | Philip Costa Hibberd | treasuryXL | LinkedIn |

What are 3 key do’s and don’ts to keep in mind in your RPA journey? Find out in this article I wrote, which was originally published in the Summer Edition of the Zanders Magazine.

This article was originally published in the Summer Edition of the Zanders Magazine. Are you interested in knowing more about Process Automation in the realms of Finance, Treasury and Risk Management? Feel free to reach out to me on LinkedIn.

Original Source

Last year’s spring, we organized a ‘jargon-free’ breakfast session to explore what robotic process automation (RPA) is all about. We had a look under the hood of a complex, hard-working robot and shared experiences on how to make the journey of deploying a digital workforce as smooth as possible. Find a brief summary below, covering (briefly) what RPA is about, what are the 3 main stages of the RPA journey, and what are the key do’s and don’ts per each stage.

RPA

RPA stands for Robotic Process Automation and is software that performs rule-based work, interacting with systems, websites and applications in the same way a human would. It is a powerful tool that, when applied to the complex industries we work in, allows us to focus more on the valuable activities that make our jobs interesting and less on the boring and repetitive tasks that no one wants to do. You can think of it as macros on steroids.

3 Stages of the RPA Journey

You can find the key takeaways from the Breakfast Session, in the form of do’s and don’ts, summarized below for each of the following 3 stages of the RPA journey:

  • Proof-of-concept: very first stage, where you are focused on exploring the possibilities of RPA
  • Early implementation: the stage where you are focused on rolling out a few robots and automating a handful of processes that you still ‘know by name’
  • Growth: the stage where you are focused on rolling out and managing a full digital workforce and automating more processes than you can remember

The 3 Do’s and the 3 Don’ts

Proof-of-concept

✔Do: Have fun!

Did you enjoy playing with Lego when you were a child? Then you will probably enjoy tinkering with RPA. Just like with Lego, spend some time discovering all the different components that you have available and finding out all the different ways you can get them together to craft something useful and tailor-made to your needs. Did you like playing with Barbies better than Lego? That’s also great, don’t worry. Deploying RPA in your team will give you plenty of opportunities to put your role-playing experience to use. Understanding roles, responsibilities, objectives and requirements of a process and effectively communicating the benefit of automating via RPA are the pillars of a successful implementation.

❌ Don’t: Don’t forget to explore slightly more advanced components, such as queues, credential management tools, log management tools, robot orchestration and control rooms.

You don’t want to have to bulldoze and rebuild your shiny proof-of-concept automation in a later stage, just because you weren’t aware of these components. They will become critical once you have more than a few processes at hand.

To stay in the Lego metaphor: make sure to explore the features of the full Lego range and don’t just idle on the baby-friendly Lego Duplo.

Early Implementation

✔Do: Make sure processes and solutions are well documented.

I get it. You want to start building your bot as soon as possible. But make sure to first invest some time in drafting the following documents:

• A Process Design Document to capture at the very least the As-is process flow

• A Solution Design Document to capture how you intend to automate the process

You will be happy to have the former if (when?) you start having discussions on the scope of the work that the bot is expected to perform. It can prevent misunderstanding about what the process is all about and what the bot can do. You will be happy to have the latter if (when?) you have to do some maintenance on the bot that you are now developing. This blueprint will help you to quickly zoom in on the component that you need to tweak.

Good documentation will become even more important as your team grows. Imagine how much karma you will earn when someone in urgent need of fixing the bot finds and reads your clear blueprint!

❌ Don’t: Don’t automate sub-optimal processes.

Get everyone familiar with the concept of GIGO – Garbage In Garbage Out – and its less polite brother SISO. A bad manual process will become a terrible automated process, because robots can only act based on predefined rules. The rules can be as complex as you like but there can’t be any room for discretionary judgment. The untiring robots lack that.

Make it clear that a process needs to be streamlined and standardized before it can be a candidate for automation. If it’s not, someone will have to cross the jungle of “It has always been done this way”, which usually stands between a ‘Garbage Process’ and a ‘Good Process’. Who knows, it might turn out that many tasks and subtasks in the process weren’t needed after all.

Growth

✔Do: Set up a clear RPA Governance.

Once you hit the stage of growth, where your team is rolling out one bot after another, clearly defining the process of automating processes becomes even more important than clearly defining the process that you are automating.

Does the RPA team sit in IT or with the business? Who is responsible for what, in case of a malfunction? How are Audit, Compliance and Risk Management going to adjust policies to include the changes brought in by your new digital workforce?

❌ Don’t: Don’t forget Security.

While designing your RPA Governance framework, don’t forget the more practical side of Security.

You wouldn’t want to allow anyone the temptation of circumventing the four-eyes principle you already have in place. For example, you must make sure it is still impossible for anyone to input a payment to themselves and have it released by the unaware robot accomplice.

Define as soon as possible how you are going to create, assign and manage the credentials that your bots will need to interact with your existing IT infrastructure. Particularly in the case of unattended bots, it would be best to create specific users for your digital colleagues, with clearly distinguishable usernames. You might even consider going as far as letting your robot change all its passwords to ones of its secret liking as soon as it gets in production.

 

 

Philip Costa Hibberd

 

 

 

 

Does your business need support in Treasury or a Treasury QuickScan?

We have treasurers available, go to Rent a Treasurer for all information.



Survey says: Treasurers Want More Accurate Cash Forecasting

28-03-2022 | treasuryXL | Gtreasury | LinkedIn |

Modernization is quickly coming to cash forecasting. Corporate treasury teams are accelerating their embrace of new technology strategies and are refining existing methods to introduce greater automation, efficiency, and accuracy. The trend has undoubtedly been spurred by the pandemic, during which treasurers have sought greater access to data in order to optimize cash management – as best they could – during periods of relative uncertainty.

In the recently released Cash Forecasting & Visibility Survey undertaken by treasury analysis firm Strategic Treasurer, nearly 250 professionals from across the global treasury ecosystem weighed in on their current and future state of cash forecasting. The results paint a picture of an industry with an acute demand for faster forecasting and real-time global cash positioning, a growing appetite for emerging AI/ML technology, and plans for heavy spending to realize more rapid and accurate forecasting processes.

Source

The report is worth a read in full, but here are four of the biggest takeaways for treasurers:

1. Low-tech cash forecasting is still being widely used, but high-tech is the far more popular choice.

The vast majority of treasury teams still use traditional (and very manual) forecasting tools. Ninety-one percent of respondents report using Excel as one of their forecasting tools. In comparison, one-quarter have a treasury management system (TMS) in place, and 28% use ERP systems. Fifteen percent use financial reporting and analysis (FR&A) or budgeting tools to assist in their forecasts, and just 5% use a dedicated forecasting platform.

While Excel is the leading forecasting tool by usage, it clearly lags in making treasurers happy. Fifty-seven percent of those utilizing a TMS or ERP are satisfied with their tooling, while just 42% of Excel users say the same.

Variance analysis is another task requiring heavy manual effort from treasury teams. Fifty-seven percent of respondents say that their variance analysis activities are fully manual, and another 19% report significant manual activities. One-fifth of companies only avoid this manual effort by performing no variance analysis whatsoever. The remaining 5% of respondents utilize variance analysis that’s backed by fully-automated processes.

 

2. Cash forecasting is a major priority, receiving major investments.

Fifty-nine percent of treasurers believe that the importance of cash forecasting will increase in 2022, with 27% saying it will become significantly more important. At the same time, nearly half of respondents say they currently have an “extremely difficult” time generating forecasts.

 

 

As a result of this unfulfilled need, 35% of treasury and finance departments report plans for extremely heavy spending on technology for treasury systems and cash forecasting capabilities. Forty-one percent plan to focus significant spending on treasury systems in the next year, while 40% plan similarly significant spending on cash forecasting. Additionally, respondents reported heavy technology spending plans that specifically focus on bank account management (33%), reconciliation (28%), payments (28%), and cash reporting (27%).

 

3. AI/ML-powered cash forecasting will increase over 400% in the next two years. 

While just 6% of respondents currently use AI/ML technology to power cash forecasting, their reported plans indicate that within two years that number will reach 27%. Further out than two years, that jumps to 51%.

Respondents also indicate a similarly bright trajectory for regression analysis: 12% use it currently, projected usage will grow to 29% in two years, and 43% use or expect to use it in the future.

 

 

4. Forecasts peer further forward in time (and treasurers would forecast even more, given the time and tools).

Respondents report increasing the frequency of their cash forecasting: 55% now forecast either weekly or daily. Forecasts extend to a more distant time horizon as well, with a plurality of 39% of respondents now looking ahead six months or more, and another 35% forecasting between two and five months out.

Respondents also expressed a greater appetite for cash forecasting than what their current tools and time requirements can feed. If available, 64% of respondents would invest more time to improve the accuracy of their forecasting. Forty-six percent would use extra time to perform variance analysis. One-quarter would increase both the frequency and outlook of their forecasts.

 

The upshot: Treasurers are in hot pursuit of better cash forecasting capabilities.

The survey’s findings are beads strung along a common thread: treasury teams recognize and demand the benefits of more efficient and effective cash forecasting. With investments in TMS, ERP, AI/ML, regression analysis tools and more, many treasurers are already pursuing new strategies and spending what it takes to place the strategies and technologies they require at their command.

 

Meet our Expert | 8 questions for Peter Löbl-Brand, Corporate Treasurer and Lecturer

21-03-2022 | Peter Löbl-Brand | treasuryXL | LinkedIn |

 

We are happy to interview our newest treasuryXL expert, Peter Löbl-Brand.

Peter has been a corporate treasurer for over 10 years and is also a lecturer for multinational finance and risk management at the University of Applied Science in Wiener Neustadt, Austria.

Peter gathered insights while advising multi-national listed companies as well as local small and medium-sized companies.

He currently lives south of Vienna and is focusing on re-/structuring corporate treasury departments of SMEs.

Visit Peter’s LinkedIn profile to see an overview of his career and activities. But first…

We asked him 8 questions, let’s go!

INTERVIEW

 

1. How did your treasury journey start?

My treasury journey started about 10 years ago as a credit risk manager at RHI AG, now RHI Magnesita. After about 3 years of working in this position, I got the chance to take over the Treasury team as team leader.

2. What do you like about working in Treasury?

It’s a people’s business. Ensuring liquidity and therefore laying the foundation for the operative business of the corporate while having always a close relationship with your capital partner end strengthening their trust in the corporate feels like being one of the most important and highly valued links in the business.

3. What is your Treasury Expertise and what expertise gives you a boost of energy?

I started my career in the group treasury of a listed company. Stage by stage I developed myself into a full-scale treasury and commercial officer working for a bigger SME company right now. My focus is on small to medium sizes companies with a high need for commercial structuring and the need to set up treasury management from scratch. To build, entertain and lead by example is energizing myself to perform.

4. What has been the best experience in your treasury career until today?

Enabling business with partly sanctioned customers and countries.

5. What has been your biggest challenge in treasury?

Maintaining the tension and excitement after more than 10 years in corporate treasury.

6. What’s the most important lesson that you’ve learned as a treasurer?

Do not trust a soft commitment.

7. How have you seen the role of Corporate Treasury evolve over the years?

From my understanding, the corporate treasury is a business enabler. Especially when driving business internationally the corporate treasury is able to pilot business relationships to success. Based on that understanding Corporate Treasury is always seeking to find better instruments and the appropriate solution to close a deal.

8. What developments do you expect in corporate treasury in the near and further future?

I expect more and more solutions and instruments acting on the blockchain. Right now the industry is too much focusing on the blockchain as an enabler for cryptocurrency. Using the blockchain in international business will also solve the impossible trilemma as it makes business cheaper, adding quality and reducing costs for all parties.

 

Get in touch with Peter
Click here for his Expert Profile

 

Thanks for reading!

 

 

Kendra Keydeniers

Director Community & Partners, treasuryXL

 

 

 

 

Russia Ukraine Crisis Update

16-03-2022 | treasuryXL | ComplexCountries | LinkedIn |

Safety of employees and delivery of salary payments are the highest priorities of treasurers responsible for Russia and Ukraine who also shared their experiences approaches to sanctions compliance, local operations and FX hedging. This report is based on an emergency 90-minute peer call with participation from 15 major companies.

This report was compiled by Monie Lindsey. based on a Treasury Peer Call chaired by Damian Glendinning.

Source

Chair’s Overview

Today’s call was very somber. Two weeks ago (Report: Russia Treasury & Banking Update 21st Feb), members were looking at contingency plans, but the consensus was that most of what was happening was posturing, and that the worst would not happen. Today, there was no discussion of how long hostilities might last – most people agree that there is no easy or rapid solution in sight. Instead, the main priority of most participants is making sure their teams are safe, helping them leave Ukraine if they wish, and making sure salary payments get through in both countries. We all send our best wishes to the many people whose lives have been shattered by this conflict.

The actions and approaches were remarkably consistent across all the participants. Topics discussed and actions taken:

  • The main priority is the safety of the local teams. Nearly every participant has taken extra steps to make sure local staff have cash, including prepaying salaries by up to three months. This is being done in both Russia and Ukraine, as MNCs cannot be sure of being able to remit cash to Russia in the future.
  • Most participants have either exited, suspended, or slowed down their businesses in Russia. Those who are importing goods into Russia for sale locally are continuing business as long as inventories last, but they are not shipping new inventory into the country.
  • There were a few questions about the sanctions, but the general view is that these are clear. Even if a company wants to ship goods into Russia, it is proving very difficult to find logistics companies that are prepared to undertake the shipment.
  • Payments continue for the time being. In Ukraine, the banking system continues to function, and some participants have sent cash into the country to make sure salaries are paid. Paying cash out of Ukraine is no longer possible, but payments continue to be made out of Russia, even if they can be slowed down due to additional sanctions checks.
  • The main sanctions-related discussion was about the extent to which local payments within Russia can still be made using sanctioned banks. The general feeling was that this is allowed, though there was some confusion. Participants have received conflicting advice about whether there is an effective carve-out in the sanctions for salary payments.
  • Foreign banks are registered under local law in Russia, so they can, and do, continue to operate. As usual, some are providing better service than others.
  • One issue raised with sanctions is that they can cause issues for the local staff: it may be illegal under local law for them to apply the sanctions, or it can cause them personal issues. This is usually being monitored closely with HR and Legal.
  • Most companies are re-evaluating their hedging programs:
    • Hedging the rouble has become a lot more expensive, and there is unlikely to be much underlying business to hedge, so most programs will probably stop.
    • In many cases, it is proving difficult, or impossible, to roll existing hedges
    • For NDFs, the reference rate used for settlement is no longer being quoted *(see note below), so it will be necessary to negotiate with the banks about what alternative rate to use
    • No participant was concerned about forwards which require them to deliver roubles outside Russia. However, companies to whom this applies are advised to discuss this situation with their banks: if they find themselves unable to deliver the roubles on the due date, the situation can become messy and potentially expensive.
  • Some participants have bolstered local liquidity in Russia by taking out local bank loans, which continue to be available – though there is some nervousness about how long lines may be available. Many have sent in cash via intercompany loans to make sure salaries and taxes can be paid. Several participants have also bolstered the liquidity of their Ukrainian operations by sending in intercompany loans.
  • There was little discussion about how to continue making payments despite the sanctions. It was pointed out that, even if a bank is barred from SWIFT, payments can still be made using paper instructions – though delays may occur due to the need to implement new correspondent banking relationships and apply additional sanctioned party checks. In any case, the feeling is that sanctions will limit the amount of business giving rise to payments.
  • A couple of participants are being impacted by the removal of international credit cards: this impacts Russian staff currently outside the country on short-term assignments, and those receiving payment by credit card from inside Russia.

Bottom line: the main concern is the safety of local staff and making sure they have enough cash to survive. Business in Russia is basically on hold, but cash is still flowing where it is required, especially for salary payments. Participants are being very careful to adhere to the new sanctions.

Again, we all hope that the bloodshed will soon come to an end.

*Note: 10th March we have subsequently heard that the central bank is providing a daily fix against the USD at a rate that is lower than the market rate (105 – 115 compared to 130-140).

Would you like a full copy of this report?

Request a Copy, but please make a donation to the Save the Children Ukraine Humanitarian Appeal

Meet our Expert | 8 questions for Jermal McDaniel

14-03-2022 | Jermal McDaniel | treasuryXL | LinkedIn |

 

We are happy to interview treasuryXL expert, Jermal McDaniel.

Jermal is an accomplished Finance practitioner with over 16 years of Treasury operations and Finance experience.

Jermal is an innovative visionary who utilizes a “Think Tank” methodology to generate ideas and action plans designed to streamline and automate manual processes to facilitate department efficiency.

How did his career in Treasury start and what is his best experience working in Treasury?

We asked him 8 questions, let’s go!

INTERVIEW

 

1. How did your treasury journey start?

My Treasury journey started when my agency recruiting career ended in 2003. I did not set out to be a Treasurer, I kind of found myself in the Treasury field and I am blessed to still be a part of the Treasury Community.

2. What do you like about working in Treasury?

I love the sense of urgency, the attention to detail, and the camaraderie/synergy needed to be a successful Treasury department. I often tell my staff that Treasurers are not born, they are made, and if you are detail-oriented, can work well under pressure, and are timely and accurate, I can give you the rest of the tools to be successful.

3. What is your Treasury Expertise and what expertise gives you a boost of energy?

My Treasury experience is Mortgage-related. When studying for the CTP it gave me a lot of insight into FX transactions, Short Term liquidity investments, and optimal Debt vs Equity financing philosophies for Firms, but my expertise is in managing all aspects of Treasury including Banking relationships and building well run cross-functional Treasury Teams.

4. What has been the best experience in your treasury career until today?

My best experience has been seeing a few of my former employees take the knowledge and guidance that I have given them and parlay that into Sr. Manager and Director of Treasury roles.

5. What has been your biggest challenge in treasury?

Data mining, and consistently getting timely information reconciled and into a useful form for Senior leaders to use for decision making.

6. What’s the most important lesson that you’ve learned as a treasurer?

You cannot perform all of the Treasury functions on your own and if you do not have a cross-trained Treasury team, there will be a high probability that important transactions will fall through the cracks tarnishing the reputation of your team and the department.

7. How have you seen the role of Corporate Treasury evolve over the years?

I am excited to see that Firms are really beginning to value what a good Treasury department means to the Firm. As the stewards of the Cash, making sure that there are enough funds to satisfy all of the financial obligations is Paramount to the success and reputation of the Firm.

8. What developments do you expect in corporate treasury in the near and further future?

There is a big push to bring on more Fintech resources to help with recording and reconciling all of the day-to-day cash movements. Treasury Management Systems are helping to streamline cash forecasting and reconciling by becoming a “Single Source of Truth” where information can be accessed by all of the Stakeholders making everyone involved more self-sufficient.

 

Get in touch with Jermal
Click here for his Expert Profile

Thanks for reading!

 

 

Kendra Keydeniers

Director Community & Partners, treasuryXL

Treasury Delta and Blokken Partnership

03-03-2022 | treasuryXL | Treasury Delta | LinkedIn | Treasury Delta, our Irish fintech partner, recently formed an alliance with Blokken, a Dubai-based fintech aggregator. This strategic partnership will bring further innovation and digital technology deployment to the corporate treasury ecosystem within the Middle East. Credits: Blokken Source

Read more