5 Treasury Trends for 2023: Managing Currencies in an Age of Uncertainty

26-01-2023 | treasuryXL | Kantox | LinkedIn |

Scared about 2023 looking even worse than the crazy last three years? Keep calm and take a holistic approach to currency management. 

Source: Kantox

If we look back at the economic landscape of last year, treasurers and CFOs have been dealing with risky scenarios for a while. But is the future as dark as some say? Our latest episode of CurrencyCast featured the treasury trends for 2023. In this article, we will take a deep dive into those trends and give you some tips on how to tackle the challenges in this volatile landscape.

Treasury trends for 2023

Consultants and pundits are busy laying out scary scenarios for 2023. However, the future is uncertain so let’s not waste time in futurology trying to predict what’s coming.

Instead, we can focus on understanding the treasury trends of 2023. In this article, we’ll analyse those trends with a focus on currency management and give you actionable tips on how to handle any hurdles ahead.

CFOs and corporate treasurers need to be well prepared for the upcoming challenges and opportunities as they manage currencies. The top five priorities in the corporate treasury space for 2023 are:

  1. FX volatility
  2. Shifting interest rate differentials
  3. Liquidity management
  4. Cash flow visibility
  5. Automation

FX volatility

In the past year, the financial markets have seen high levels of FX volatility and an unstable economy that seems to point towards a recession. Trends of high inflation, banks’ rising interest rates, political instability, and more will remain in the new year.

Hence why, it is fair to say that currency managers need to be well-prepared to face interrelated risks affecting FX rates. Companies dealing with foreign currencies will have difficulties accurately forecasting cash flows.

However, there is no reason to panic yet. There are a few strategies that corporate finance professionals can implement to tackle FX volatility; we will explain them later.

Shifting interest rate differentials

Shifting interest rate differentials are a likely scenario in 2023 as central banks act to tame inflation, each at its own pace. The good news is that companies can optimise such interest rate differentials across the entire FX workflow. Here are a couple of examples:

– With favourable forward points, pricing with the forward rate improves the firm’s competitive position without hurting budgeted profit margins.

– With unfavourable forward points, pricing with the forward rate helps managers avoid losses on carry and the temptation of excessive pricing markups.

– Finally, the cost of hedging can be lowered by delaying hedging execution with the help of automated conditional FX orders.

. 

 

Liquidity management

In addition, the current emphasis on strong liquidity management will persist well into 2023. Liquidity management allows the treasury team to have a wider view of the company’s resources and be financially agile.

This will give any treasury professional the required accurate insights on the cash projections. And ultimately, help the business be prepared for potential liquidity risks that may arise.

Cash flow visibility

Avoiding less-than-stellar cash flow visibility will be top of mind for treasurers in 2023. As economic cycles could be disrupted again, companies need to be able to get ahead of the curve and reduce deviations in their cash flow projections.

However, we believe that the importance of having accurate cash flow forecasts is somewhat overstated, at least when it comes to currency risk management.

To understand why this is so, the treasury team should consider how the different cash flow hedging programs deal with this concern:

– In firms with dynamic prices, forecasting accuracy is not much of a concern because firm sales/purchase orders have a very high occurrence probability.

– In firms with steady prices across several campaign/budget periods, layered hedging programs build the hedge rate in advance instead of protecting an FX rate.

– In firms with steady prices for a single campaign/budget period, conditional orders to protect the budget rate provide managers with time to update their forecasts.

For better cash flow visibility in the new year, companies will need to consider their ability to implement hedging programs that best suit their needs.

Automation

In 2023, the role of the corporate treasurer will require professionals to improve their technological skills. The traditional treasury function is shifting towards an automated digital infrastructure that enables increased efficiency and faster processes.

To manage currency risk in the new year, treasurers will need to move away from siloed systems and wasting time on manual tasks. Instead, they need to look for a solution that is able to automate the entire FX workflow.

Tools that are able to connect, via APIs, to their treasury management system and other data sources, for updated reports that give accurate insights into their FX exposure.

Facing the challenges

Now you know the treasury trends that will be dominating 2023 for corporate treasurers. But we also want to give you some tips on how currency managers should act in the face of such challenges.

As we like to emphasise at Kantox, currency management is much more than currency risk management. And currency risk management, in turn, is more than just the act of executing a hedge. Let us see this in more detail.

Consider the case of automated conditional orders to protect a budget rate. To the extent that the underlying levels are not hit, no trades are executed. Yet, you are still actively managing your firm’s exposure to currency risk.

Delaying hedges may lead to netting opportunities that ultimately result in less, not more, hedging transactions. The results are:

  • Less trading costs
  • Savings on the carry in the event of unfavourable forward points
  • Less cash immediately set aside for collateral requirements

The right approach for 2023

Pundits predicting a catastrophic 2023 may turn out to be right. Then again, they might not. In any case, the priority for currency managers is to take a holistic view of currency management that allows them to:

  • Embrace the entire FX workflow
  • Avoid silos and have commercial and finance teams work hand in hand
  • Take advantage of the profit margin-enhancing opportunities offered by currencies

As you have seen, corporate treasurers will need to be well-prepared for all the interrelated risks of the turbulent economic landscape. With the help of the right automation tools, the treasury function can have a strong currency management strategy that helps them storm the weather outside.

Kantox is the currency management automation solution that covers the entire FX workflow so you can improve your profit margins and leverage foreign currencies.

Book a free strategy session with our currency management specialists to learn more.

Hedging Strategies 101: Layered Hedging

16-01-2023 | treasuryXL | Kantox | LinkedIn |

Avoid the cliff and protect your cash flows! When volatility is at an all-time high, the right currency hedging strategy can set you apart. And save your business from an uncertain future. Transform your FX risk with a layered hedging strategy that will help you withstand unexpected changes in FX markets and protect your margins.

When implementing an FX hedging program, finance professionals responsible for risk management must be aware of the ins and outs of their business. This will be the starting point to uncover potential gaps in the hedging strategy and also opportunities to implement the program that fits perfectly.

Let’s understand how a layered hedging program works and how it could fit with your FX strategy.

Why is a layered hedging strategy important?

Layered hedging programs allow CFOs and Treasurers to handle the related problems of FX markets volatility, shifting interest rate differentials, and less-than-stellar cash flow visibility.

The goal of a layered hedging program is to smooth out the hedge rate over time to lower the variability of company cash flows. Additionally, a layered hedging program that is created from scratch can deal with the problem of forecasting accuracy.

Instead of ‘protecting’ an FX rate, layered hedging programs build the hedge rate in advance. And because hedges are applied in layers, in a progressive manner, you do not need a 100% accurate forecast at all.

Who can benefit from a layered hedging program?

Not all hedging programs are the same, as they tackle different goals for managing FX risk. Before you implement a layered hedging program and start dedicating time and resources, you need to think about certain conditions. These relate to your current business model -including pricing structure, the FX exposure you want to hedge, cash flows, etc.- and your company’s specific needs when it comes to FX hedging.

This type of hedging program is best suited for firms that need or desire to keep steady prices not only for one individual campaign/budget period, but for a set of campaign/budget periods linked together. In layered hedging:

(a) Prices are usually not FX-driven, meaning that the FX rate plays no role in pricing strategy.

(b) The impact of the ‘cliff’ -a sharp adverse fluctuation in currency rates between periods-, cannot be passed on to customers at the onset of a new period.

(c) The exposure to hedge is a rolling cash flow forecast for a set of periods linked together.

Unlike other cash flow hedging programs, like static hedging where prices are either frequently updated or updated at the onset of a new budget period, pricing does not act as a hedging mechanism in layered hedging programs. And that puts cash flows at risk, so a solution must be found elsewhere.

In comes the star of layered hedging, smoothing the rate.

Smoothing the hedge rate over time

The secret of achieving a smooth hedge rate over time is to create commonality between trade dates for a given value date. Take, for example, a 12-month layered hedging program. The value date of October is hedged in 12 different months, from October in the previous year down to September.

Next, the value date of November is hedged in the same manner, starting in November of the previous year down to October. And so on and so forth. Note that the two value dates -October and November- share eleven out of twelve trade dates with the same spot rate. That’s the concept of the mechanically created commonality that lies at the heart of layered hedging programs.

However, the process of ‘layering the hedges’ is not as simple as it may seem at first glance. There are some common challenges that Treasurers and CFOs face when manually performing FX risk management activities.

Common challenges in layered hedging

Before crafting the optimal layered hedging program for your business, there are three common challenges that need to be considered. These are crucial to the success of the FX hedging strategy. And they relate to the configuration of the program, the intrinsic constraints of the business, and the level of automation currently available to the team. Let’s take a closer look.

  • Configurations. Depending on risk managers’ secondary objectives, there are many possible configurations for a layered hedging program. Some of these configurations regard:

(1) The degree to which the hedge rate is smoothed, for example by adjusting the programs’ length.

(2) The optimisation of forward points. For example, hedge execution can be delayed if forward points are ‘unfavourable’.

(3) The distance between the average hedge rate and the spot rate.

  • Constraints. Each treasury team may face its own set of constraints, some examples include:

(1) The degree of forecast accuracy.

(2) Possible limitations imposed by liquidity providers who might not let a firm trade forward contracts that expire, say, more than two years out.

  • Automation. Needless to say, a manually executed layered hedging program can be pretty demanding, especially if many currency pairs are involved. We’ve seen companies running such programs with the help of enormous spreadsheets. This only creates two different operational risks:

(1) Spreadsheet risk, including data input errors, copy & paste errors, formatting and formula errors.

(2) Key person risk, as only a handful of individuals understand the formulas that underpin the ‘monster’ spreadsheets.

Eliminating the uncertainty

Layered hedging programs are a powerful FX risk management tool to face the trifecta of problems created by a highly volatile scenario. These hurdles include currency risk —including the risk of a cliff, as we saw recently with the GBP-USD exchange rate—, shifting interest rate differentials, and less-than-stellar cash flow visibility.

Now that you know the ins and outs of layered hedging, you can start transforming your FX risk management workflow. And forget about the challenges that may come when facing uncertainty. That’s a pretty powerful advantage in a scenario of pandemics, inflation and war!

Optimal hedging strategy with Currency Management Automation

If you want to leave behind the challenges of manual work when it comes to currency risk, consider implementing automation software.

Kantox is the only solution that streamlines the currency management process through powerful automation of the entire FX workflow. This enables businesses to reduce currency risk, protect profit margins and price more competitively.

Who should “give a push”​ and work on APIs?

12-01-2023 | treasuryXL | LinkedIn |

A new year, a new edition in which we discuss the latest treasuryXL poll results. It is encouraging that once again many treasurers participated in the vote. We examined the voting patterns of treasurers and gathered the perspectives of experts Jack Gielen and Konstantin Khorev on the topic of APIs in treasury.

Source

Who should “give a push”​ and work on APIs?

It is commonly understood that APIs are prevalent in today’s digital landscape. However, corporate treasurers can also reap benefits from API technology and its advantages. If you are unsure about the importance of APIs in Treasury or need more information, you should definitely watch the recording of the joint webinar together with Cobase on the future of APIs. It is encouraging that once again many treasurers participated in the vote. The current treasuryXL poll remains open and we encourage you to continue to have your voice heard! You can cast your vote on this link.

Question: Who should “give a push”​ and work on APIs?

First observation

That looks quite straightforward: partners should join forces. Do the treasuryXL experts agree, or what is their view on this?

View of treasuryXL experts

Jack Gielen (Cobase)

Jack voted for the option that partners should join forces.

Geen alternatieve tekst opgegeven voor deze afbeelding

 

“APIs and the benefits are clearly on the map but there is also an understanding that there is still work to be done before those benefits will really be realised”

It is good to see that regarding the results of this poll, the market agrees that the success of corporate APIs and OpenBanking requires cooperation and cannot be dictated by 1 party. This means Treasurers clearly understand the complexity of the playing field. At the moment, although there are many initiatives by individual parties, there is a need to create a good partnership where the whole eco-system works together

The main benefits that APIs could realise if banks and companies were to work together are:

  • Better integration of banking services into customers’ own internal systems,
  • Easier connection to new banks and expansion of banking services
  • Better and more real-time data that can be converted into actionable information

These benefits translate into being able to use the systems the treasurer has chosen more efficiently and better, more up-to-date insight into status, exposures and required actions.

Recently, Cobase set up the webinar “The Future of APIs” in collaboration with treasuryXL to discuss this topic. I was particularly impressed by the level of knowledge Treasurers have gained over the past year which was also reflected in the questions. APIs and the benefits are clearly on the map but there is also an understanding that there is still work to be done before those benefits will really be realised. Ultimately, the priority with the end customer, the treasurer, will determine how quickly other market players act.

Konstantin Khorev

Konstantin voted for the option that partners should join forces.

Geen alternatieve tekst opgegeven voor deze afbeelding

 

“By working together, we can achieve a more efficient and effective treasury management system.”

I agree with the majority view that the implementation of APIs in the treasury field should be a collaborative effort. Banks will play a key role in implementing these changes, but it is also crucial for corporates and TMS providers to set and specify the requirements. This ensures that the solutions being implemented align with the unique needs and goals of each individual corporate, and TMS providers can develop the tools and services necessary to support these needs. By working together, we can achieve a more efficient and effective treasury management system.

Recently, my latest article on this topic was published on treasuryXL. In it, I try to make it plain that APIs are a nice and easy solution, although they come with some limitations and challenges. At the same time, I believe that the future of bank connectivity lies in API technology. What do you think?

How can fintech rise to the challenge of AML compliance?

12-01-2023 | treasuryXL | Refinitiv | LinkedIn |

A new white paper from Refinitiv, produced in collaboration with global consultancy, FINTRAIL, unpacks some of the key financial crime-related challenges facing fintech today, and explores how companies in this evolving sector can best manage AML compliance.

 

  1. A new white paper explores three key challenges currently at play in the fintech space.
  2. Fintech priorities are balanced between operational efficiencies, positive customer experiences and regulatory compliance.
  3. Discover more in the paper from Refinitiv and FINTRAIL, which is based on interviews with experts in different international fintech.

For more data-driven insights in your Inbox, subscribe to the Refinitiv Perspectives weekly newsletter.

Fintech and illicit activity

The fintech space is highly dynamic and agile, but this industry of innovation and opportunity is substantially impacted by a constantly evolving financial crime landscape.

Emerging technology, quickly adopted by fintech and leveraged to make every facet of our lives easier, is similarly harnessed by financial criminals seeking to engage in illicit activity.

Criminals seeking to evade controls are resourceful, quickly making used of new opportunities to conduct illicit activity

New findings from Refinitiv and FINTRAIL – based on interviews with experts in different fintech across a range of geographies – reveal the top challenges faced by the fintech and focus on three key challenges currently at play in this dynamic space.

Read the white paper: AML challenges for fintechs: Insights for the future

What are the three key challenges facing fintech?

Online fraud

Fraud continues to grow across the globe and is a key pain point highlighted by the fintech we spoke to.

One of the top fraud-related challenges currently in play is application fraud, where sophisticated financial criminals typically impersonate individuals or make use of synthetic identities.

Illicit actors are leveraging powerful technology to do this – manipulating information, tapping into advanced graphics techniques and exploiting vulnerabilities wherever possible.

In the UK, reported losses totalled £2.35bn in 2021. In the U.S., 2.8 million consumers made fraud reports in 2021.

In the United Kingdom, where fraud is the most commonly experienced crime, reported losses totalled £2.35 billion in 2021. In the United States, fraud trumps all other proceed-generating crimes and 2.8 million consumers made fraud reports in 2021.

 – AML challenges for fintech: Insights for the future

The fintecs we spoke to are responding in a range of ways, from providing better customer education and raising awareness to protect vulnerable customers, to ramping up collaboration initiatives between the private sector, governments and law enforcement agencies.

Digital assets and cryptocurrency challenges

Crypto continues to grow, and hand-in-hand with this, regulation within the sector is also increasing.

Against a highly dynamic situation, where products and technologies are evolving at speed, virtual asset service providers (VASPs) need to keep pace with a changing regulatory curve, especially when it comes to complying with differences across jurisdictions.

Even fintech that don’t bank digital assets need to stay acutely aware of the crypto-related risk as they may interact with VASPs, and consequently, need to understand potential regulatory obligations.

Sanctions

Sanctions are another key challenge for fintech, and little wonder given the global sanctions landscape that has unfolded throughout most of 2022.

AML teams have been scrambling to keep pace with the exponentially rising volume of sanctions, especially – but not only – those related to the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

Not only has the absolute volume of sanctions been increasing, but individual sanctions have been becoming increasingly complex, leading to rising compliance costs for fintech as well as their traditional financial services industry counterparts.

Non-compliance can have far-reaching consequences – ranging from financial to reputational and more.

Sanctions are our highest priority and receive dedicated 24/7/365 attention

A best practice response

The fintech we spoke to are acutely aware of the need to protect against widespread illicit activity and of the requirement to remain compliant at all times.

At the same time, they operate in a lean industry of constant change, exponentially growing customer bases and a breakneck pace of business.

This means that building a best-practice response to financial crime must be carefully considered, efficient and effective.

Leading-edge AML technology, robust data and skilled compliance professionals – whether in-house or outsourced – can offer the solution to help manage and mitigate financial crime risk and the key challenges outlined above.

High on the list of fintech priorities is striking the all-important balance between operational efficiencies, positive customer experiences and regulatory compliance – and with the right data, technology and human insights, this delicate balancing act can be maintained.

Read the white paper: AML challenges for fintechs: Insights for the future

Interview | 7 questions for Adesola Orimalade, Seasoned Treasury Professional

09-01-2023 | treasuryXL | Adesola Orimalade | LinkedIn |

 

Meet our newest expert for the treasuryXL community, Adesola Orimalade

Adesola is one of the few Treasury professionals around who has worked in both banking and corporate treasury, across various industries and in both Africa and Europe.

Since walking into his first role over a decade ago, he has built his competence in many areas of treasury including cash management, treasury operations and operational/liquidity risk management.

Aside from his professional background Adesola is passionate about using his professional knowledge and expertise to support voluntary organisations that operate within his areas of interest (homelessness, poverty, climate change etc). He currently serves on the board of a U.K. charity.

 

We asked Adesola 7 questions, let’s go!

INTERVIEW

 

 

1. How did your treasury journey start?

 

Having obtained a diploma in Town and Country planning and a first degree in Estate Management, my desired career path was to work for any of the regional or multilateral agencies devoted to development finance, urban renewal, housing etc. Growing up I had seen the slums in cities like Nairobi, Johannesburg and even Lagos. I wanted to make a difference.

Life however had a different plan for me, I started working in international banking operations at Citibank purely by accident.

It was during my time in international banking that I was first introduced to Treasury. Trade Finance as you know has a lot of opportunity to interface with Treasury and whether that’s in terms of arranging FX for importers to enable them to pay for machinery or raw materials purchased from abroad or issuing an advance payment guarantee on behalf of a contractor.

Later on I joined Standard Chartered Bank as the pioneer head of trade finance in Nigeria and as it was a small team I also served as back up to the treasury operations manager whenever she was away. It broadened my exposure to banking treasury as I got involved with managing risk across the front, middle and back office functions including taking responsibility for the confirmation and settlement of deals, position reporting and so on.

It wasn’t until 2005 however that I got into the corporate treasury which was again purely by accident. A large telecommunication service provider was seeking to enhance their corporate treasury and someone recommended me to the CFO. I was offered the deputy head of treasury role and was promoted into the Treasury Manager shortly thereafter.

That role was to fuel my passion for Treasury and although I had enjoyed my career in international trade, I wanted to build my future career path within the Treasury space.

 

2. What do you like about working in Treasury?

 

As biased as this may sound, I believe that Treasury sits at the center of an organization, and we are therefore a significant player in many of the major decisions required especially those with financial implication.

That importance of Treasury and the ability to make a positive impact within the organization is what I really like about Treasury.

In addition, I also enjoy the fact that Treasury interfaces with a lot of internal and external stakeholders. Building and nurturing those relationships is also something I enjoy about working in Treasury.

Finally the treasury is impacted by a lot of socio-economic issues external to an organization. I enjoy being informed. I enjoy current affairs. I enjoy reading and understanding the world from an economic, social, environmental and political perspective. It is great to be in a career where my passion can relate with my day to day activities.

 

3. What is your Treasury Expertise and what expertise gives you a boost of energy?

 

I view myself as a Treasury Generalist given that I have worked in both banking and corporate treasury. I have had the opportunity of working in organisations where I had responsibility for the typical front, middle and back office treasury functions.

The areas that give me a big boost however are Cash/Liquidity Management and building cash forecast models/tools, Working Capital Optimisation/Management, building greenfield treasury teams and/or functions as well as developing existing treasury teams and/or process re-engineering.

 

4. What has been your best experience in your treasury career until today?

 

When I left Nigeria to relocate to the United Kingdom, I wanted to continue building my career in Treasury but the response from my looking for roles was ‘you lack U.K. Treasury experience’.
I was excited when I got my first role in Corporate Treasury and when I look back now my best experience is that I have been able to build my career twice in a lifetime on two different continents.
Very few people can say that .

 

5. What has been your biggest challenge in treasury?

 

Successfully managing the treasury function for an online travel company during the recent covid pandemic comes easily to mind. This is bearing in mind that the travel/airline industry was one of those that was significantly affected by the local and cross border restrictions that were introduced globally.

 

6. What developments do you expect in corporate treasury in the near and further future?

 

I think the recent experience from the pandemic means that businesses would continue to focus on cash visibility, liquidity and financial risk management and how technology can be used to achieve better cash forecasting.

 

7. Is there anything that you would like to share with our treasury followers that they must know from you?

 

Over the last couple of years I have been trying to get more young people involved in treasury; especially young people from ethnic minorities in the U.K and across Europe.

On one level treasury professionals can come across as being all technical and number crunchers so the idea is to show that the profession is all inclusive.

I have been to take that message to various institutions within Europe, sharing with them “What a day looks like in the life of a treasurer”. I ran workshops for that purpose at the University of Nottingham Business School and Cologne Business School.

 

Want to connect with Adesola? Click here

 

Thanks for reading!

 

 

Kendra Keydeniers

Director Community & Partners, treasuryXL

A guide to conditional FX orders

27-12-2022 | treasuryXL | Kantox | LinkedIn |

In this article, we look closely at conditional FX orders, a powerful tool when executing your hedging strategy, and the unique role it plays in currency management — especially when it comes to delaying the execution of hedges.

Conditional orders: a brief definition

A conditional FX order is an order to execute a spot or a forward transaction to buy or sell one currency against another—but only when a predetermined limit is reached.

Conditional orders include stop-loss (SL) and take-profit (TP) orders. While SL orders are aimed at avoiding losses beyond a certain limit, PT orders are designed to take advantage of favourable moves in currency markets.

Note two time-related aspects of conditional orders in forward markets:

(a) The tenor of the underlying forward contract is specified (it could be one month, six months, or a year)

(b) The validity of the order is specified too (it can be valid for two weeks, six months, or set on a  good-until-cancelled basis).

Conditional orders are usually set on an OCO basis: one-cancels-the-other, automatically to avoid the same exposure being hedged twice in the event of extraordinary market volatility. 

Note, too, that in the event of extraordinary market volatility, conditional orders can be executed at less favourable levels than desired. This limitation exists not only in FX but in all financial markets. 

A powerful tool for risk managers

The primary purpose of conditional orders is to provide a safety net around an FX rate that the treasury team wishes to defend.

It can be the rate used in setting prices —aka the campaign/budget rate—or a ‘worst case scenario’ FX rate.  

Say that you wish to defend the rate of EUR-USD = 1 on a spot basis while the market is trading at 1.08. In this case, it is prudent to set three SL orders, each covering a third of the exposure, at 1.02, 1.00 and 0.98, respectively.

Assuming that the three levels are hit, you are mathematically assured to defend your budget or worst-case scenario FX rate.

Time is on your side

In hedging programs designed to protect a budget FX rate, the ‘buffer’ set between the market rate towards the start of the campaign and the rate to be defended with SL orders provides risk managers with a critical resource: time. 

As long as the SL orders are not executed, the passing of time means that hedge execution is delayed while FX risk remains fully under control. This brings the following four systematic advantages:

(a) More time to update cash flow forecasts

(b) More savings in terms of the cost of carry when forward points are unfavourable

(c) No cash immediately needed for collateral requirements

(d) More netting opportunities

And it’s not over yet! With luck, your TP conditional orders can be hit as well. 

Backtesting conditional orders

We recently conducted a backtest of a hedging program designed to protect the budget rate of a UK-based exporter selling into emerging markets. Over a four-year period (2017-2020), the firm would have outperformed its budget rate in three of those years while equalling it in the remaining year. In one year alone, overperformance reached 5.8%.

Delaying hedge execution with risk under control allowed the treasury team to hedge on the back of firm commitments, providing a better hedge rate than the stop-loss orders. So there you have it: when managing currency risk, consider using conditional orders. Time will be on your side. And you’ll sleep well at night! 

P.S. If you’re drafting your upcoming budget, download our Budget Hedging report and find out how to use conditional orders.

Conditional orders

Q&A with German Karaivanov | GTreasury Report

22-12-2022 | treasuryXL | GTreasury | LinkedIn |

GTreasury has compiled a market report in conjunction with PNC in order to provide actionable insights for mid-to-large companies with multinational operations and small treasury teams. The report finds that CFOs and Treasurers remain optimistic, and focus on reducing inefficiencies and streamlining operations.

GTreasury Interview Report

What will be the road ahead for CFOs and Treasurers? treasuryXL wanted to know more and held a Q&A with GTreasury’s VP of Product Management: German Karaivanov. Read below for German’s takeaways and thoughts on the report.

Q&A with German Karaivanov

 

At a high level, what are the three biggest takeaways corporate treasurers should glean from this report?

The new Pressure Points, Payments & Plans for Automation: The Road Ahead for CFOs and Treasurers survey report—conducted by Topline Strategy and commissioned by GTreasury and PNC Bank—finds corporate treasurers and CFOs are acutely focusing on three transformation goals right now. The first focus is fueling growth: treasurers and CFOs are eager to reduce costs wherever they can, but still need to be able to spur growth by improving risk management practices and getting more granular (and predictive) with their cash visibility, among other initiatives on this front.

Deploying more modernized treasury technology was also reported as essential to navigating market uncertainty—opening the door to more data-backed opportunities that can directly tie into business goals.

Also among the top-line takeaways: treasurers and CFOs are clearly ready to enter a new phase of automation for treasury functions (and across their organization’s broader financial groups). While early automation efforts had more of an ERP focus, respondents signaled that they are increasingly prepared to adopt more mature automation into their systems and apply it strategically to meet modern treasury and finance needs. 


What were the demographics of the survey?

The report surveyed 93 finance executives and corporate treasurers from more than 20 industries. Participants represented large and mid-sized enterprises in both the United States and abroad. We purposely wanted to ensure a cross-section sample that wasn’t over-pinned to any one geography or industry.


CFOs and treasurers seemed to have differing opinions in a few areas covered in the report. Was this surprising?

CFOs and treasurers are on the same page in that they’re both pressing to make treasury practices more automated, more accurate, and more efficient. But CFOs in the survey show a clear preference for prioritizing cost efficiency. Corporate treasurers, on the other hand, tend to champion improved treasury functions and operational efficiency—and that proved especially so when it comes to achieving real-time insight into cash positions. There was a clear divide here, but I don’t think it was all that surprising. More CFOs need to understand that they can have it both ways. Adding more treasury functionality, integrations, and automation will make treasury operations more efficient, both with treasury technology budgeting and with the bandwidth it frees up for treasury teams to focus on the most urgent and critical business-growth initiatives.

But even for their differences, both CFOs and treasurers do plan to leverage new banking and treasury systems to achieve their goals. Strategic technology implementations that offer process modernization and automation will reduce costs by eliminating inefficiencies and provide treasurers with optimal tooling—checking boxes for CFOs and treasurers alike.

Technology modernization is certainly a theme of the survey. In what areas do treasurers and CFOs seem especially excited about transformation?

82% of survey respondents reported payment automation as a very or extremely important focus area for their planned software projects. It was clearly the highest automation priority. CFOs and treasurers view payment automation as delivering higher staff productivity, process efficiencies, improved cash visibility, enhanced fraud protection, compliance assurance, and modernized processes aligned with the demands of the digital economy. It seems clear that payment automation will come a long way in 2023. Other high-priority focuses for software modernization projects included accounts receivable, billing, and financial planning and analysis. 

I found the results around digital transformation concerning: more than half of survey respondents said they didn’t yet have a formalized digital transformation plan even though there was a clear (and increasing) interest in making technology investments. Organizations either sticking with outdated, legacy systems are increasingly at risk as their competition advances. There’s also the internal experience: it’s easier for CFOs to hire and retain top treasury talent if their organization is using technology that makes treasurers’ jobs smoother and more efficient.

But when it comes to digital transformation, there is good news. Given the current volatile market, organizations that start their digital transformation now will likely be able to realize the benefits of their initiatives particularly quickly.

The report was conducted by a third-party, but backed by GTreasury and PNC Bank—one of the biggest banks in the United States. What is GTreasury’s relationship with PNC Bank?

GTreasury’s partnership with PNC Bank is a strategic alliance, one that enables us to bring a range of cash and FX risk management products to the market as part of PNC’s extensive digital channels and services.

 

Thank you for reading!

 

Download the market report

Interview | 8 questions for Dinesh Kumar, Treasury Strategy Consultant

20-12-2022 | treasuryXL | Dinesh Kumar | LinkedIn |

 

Meet our newest expert for the treasuryXL community, Dinesh Kumar.

Dinesh is specializing in architecting and leading large scale treasury technology transformations helping clients embrace the power of technology.  He supports group wide treasury projects in the further development of a broad range of methods and processes in the related treasury IT systems, e.g., improvement of cashflow planning, FX management and treasury reporting.

He involves in designing overall organizational strategy in the field of treasury technology application services, including evaluating new processes, models, pricing, and tools and related competitive offerings delivered treasury Service providers.

Dinesh has successfully led large treasury transformations projects utilizing SAP S/4 HANA across US, Australia, and Middle East region.

 

We asked Dinesh 8 questions, let’s go!

INTERVIEW

 

 

1. How did your treasury journey start?

After finishing my studies in Finance, I started working on stock and option trading platforms at a stock broker firm. I learned the basic concepts of stocks and options. I also built up experience at  the front office, middle office, and back office. During my time at this stock broker firm I received a lot of exposure working on trading platforms.

After 2 years, I got a chance to work on a SAP treasury implementation for a giant telecom company. I worked on Money Markets, Derivatives, Forex and Cash Management. Since then I am working on Treasury transformation projects for various clients in various countries.

 

2. What do you like about working in Treasury?

 

I love the diversity of challenges. You are dealing with the financial heart of the company and need to make sure that the right amount of blood reaches every cell. I was more into technology so turning treasury operations into systems was always challenging. I worked for many international clients, I had the opportunity to learn how different companies from different sectors and industries adapt their treasury operations and cash management as per various country regulations.

 

3. What is your Treasury Expertise and what expertise gives you a boost of energy?

 

I have been working in various roles on different Treasury projects, from interim roles to system implementations. My core treasury expertise areas are the selection and implementation of Treasury Technology (i.e., SAP, Payment Hubs, SWIFT, integration with Trading Platforms), Treasury Analytics and Insight, Technology Integration and Optimization, and Application Managed Services.

 

4. What has been your best experience in your treasury career until today?

 

For me, it’s working with different geographies, different people and cultural diversity that I personally feel is the greatest experience so far.

 

5. What’s the most important lesson that you’ve learned as a treasurer?

 

“Sound treasury management begins with a robust treasury policy”.

 

6. How have you seen the role of Corporate Treasury evolve over the years?

 

Treasurers play a unique role in managing a large portion of the balance sheet. In addition to the detailed understanding of the organization in which they operate, they are closest to macro-economic developments, particularly financial markets, and can offer valuable insights to support corporate strategy.

Increasingly over the last 10-15 years treasurers have been asked to play a bigger role, as a strategic partner to the board, advising on how best to build the business line with funds available. Treasurers, certainly in the larger companies, are now much more visible in the board room, recognized for the skills and knowledge they can bring to the table.

 

7. What developments do you expect in corporate treasury in the near and further future?

 

More and more treasurers are getting involved in ESG initiatives. Not only financing them but also embedding them into treasury processes and spearheading departmental sustainability projects. When discussing ESG in corporate treasury, green financing is often mentioned as one of the main instruments to support ESG goals.

I sense that treasurers generally are now exploring options other than multiple spreadsheets, excel data, and month-end accounting and reporting much more than they used before Covid. They are devoting more time and energy to enterprise digitalization and process automation. This is enhancing their ability to support the business round the clock from the office or virtually.

With the help of technologies like AI, we can make fact-based decisions much more rapidly in terms of resources available. Such advances are helping us to analyze M&A opportunities more critically, and explore funding, forecasting, and hedging options more forensically, even helping predict and shape our responses to supply chain disruptions.

Technology is allowing us to think and act differently, in a good way, and as treasurers, we have to seize it.

 

8. Is there anything that you would like to share with our treasury followers that they must know from you?

 

Finance and in particular treasury operations today are very dynamic and open to many uncertainties. And all the signs are that the current turbulence will continue for some time yet, perhaps worsen considerably.

In such a climate treasurers need a highly dynamic approach to fulfilling both their core and strategic responsibilities. They need to anticipate and react quickly to fast-moving developments.

They should not be afraid to act decisively, even though it may not be possible to do so based on having a clear direction and end-point certainty – inaction can also cause considerable damage.

 

Want to connect with Dinesh? Click here

 

Thanks for reading!

 

 

Kendra Keydeniers

Director Community & Partners, treasuryXL

First cross-border Confirmation of Payee solution launched for payments between France and the Netherlands

16-12-2021 | treasuryXL |

SurePay, SEPAMail.eu and StreamMind have announced the launch of the first cross-border Confirmation of Payee solution. This service enables companies and banks to check that the account information entered matches the intended beneficiary when initiating cross-border payments between France and the Netherlands and marks an important first step towards a pan-European solution in the fight against fraud.

Confirmation of Payee is a way to give consumers, banks and companies greater assurance that their payments are being routed to the intended recipient and are not being accidentally or deliberately misdirected.

Payments across Europe have increasingly shifted to digital channels, leading to a surge in fraud cases throughout the continent due to methods such as phishing, spoofing, APP scams and CEO fraud. Additionally, fraud is becoming increasingly international, whereby fraudsters are using foreign bank accounts for fraudulent purposes.

SEPAmail.eu offers an account check solution in France for more than 90% of bank accounts and SurePay’s IBAN-Name Check solution checks 99.5% of all online payments in the Netherlands.

This allows banks, consumers and companies in France and the Netherlands to check the accuracy of the account holder. This significantly reduces fraud and errors in payments. In addition, the IBAN-Name Check increases efficiency and improves the customer journey. In the Netherlands the IBAN-Name Check is used by over 150 companies such as insurance companies, lenders, government agencies, energy companies and many others, to prevent fraud or when accepting new suppliers, customers and employees.

Three Reasons to Add Real-time Payments to Your B2B Payments Mix

15-12-2022 | treasuryXL | Kyriba | LinkedIn |

If you are reading this, you are likely already exposed to the hype surrounding real-time payments. Whether you believe in the hype or not, it is inevitable that real-time payments will become ubiquitous globally in the near term.

By Rishi Munjal
VP, Product Strategy, Payments

Source

The last two decades have shown that countries with a strong mandate for real-time payments tend to have robust adoption. For example, emerging economies like India and Brazil that have implemented central bank mandates are outpacing developed nations like the U.S in terms of customer adoption.

In 2017, The Clearing House launched the RTP® network, the U.S.’s first real-time payment infrastructure. However, the adoption of real-time payments in general remains low, currently representing 0.9% transaction volume and 0.5% spend, according to the ACI Prime Time for Real-Time report. Specifically, for B2B payments the adoption is even lower. In this blog, I will explore three simple reasons a corporation should consider real-time payments as part of its payment mix. I will stay away from industry-specific use cases, as these were covered in my previous blog.

1. Rebalance your payment mix towards lower-cost and comparable payment types.

While finance organizations strive to keep the costs of operations low, they often only consider direct costs of payments. This practice creates a distorted comparison that can become a reason for inaction. Thus, it is important to measure both direct costs (e.g., provider fees, card interchange, etc.) and indirect costs (e.g., labor, technology, and support costs).

Using industry benchmarks provides a good starting point. The 2022 AFP Payments Cost Benchmarking Survey indicates that the median cost range for sending and receiving RTP® is comparable to ACH and cheaper than wires. Replacing qualifying volume of wires with RTP® can save tens of thousands of dollars, if not more, on an annual basis. You can realize these cost savings without giving up on irrevocability—a key benefit of wires. Kyriba clients’ success stories show tangible cost and productivity gains from such a strategy. If you are receiving card payments, you can save on interchange, which can be as high as 2.5%. With real-time payments, you get instant access to good funds and avoid chargebacks.

Median cost range to pay and get paid

Source: AFP® Payments Cost Benchmarking Survey, 2022

2. Improve cash visibility and liquidity.

Complementing real-time payments with real-time balance and transaction reporting improves cash visibility. This can be especially important if you make a lot of contingent payments. This includes business activities that are dependent on treasury receiving funds. For example, treasury may want to wait until certain funds have been received before releasing a particular payment. Cash visibility can be beneficial if you are being charged intraday credit or your bank does not permit intraday overdrafts.

Wider businesses may also benefit by triggering business activities based on contingent payments. For example, a supply chain team may want to hold on to a shipment until payment is received, accelerating their logistics process. In scenarios that need cash advance or cash-on-delivery, the buyer can make a real-time payment after inspecting the goods. Both parties win. The buyer reduces operational risk, and the seller reduces inventory and improves their working capital position.

With real-time payments, you are no longer beholden to the cut-off times, weekends and holidays. This means that payments can be made as late as possible. So, companies can meet emergency payments to meet any shortfall, and keep lower precautionary balances.

3. Speed up payment digitization and get the most value from your investments in modernization.

Payment processes are complex, and digitizing payments takes time. There are multiple reasons for this. Payment processes for large organizations often involve many roles; initiating, authorizing, and reconciling payments are typically handled by different parties, thereby drawing things out. Approval workflows can also be very complex, involving globally distributed teams. Technology teams may still have direct ownership of managing payment formats and bank connectivity.

When it comes to payment digitization, the U.S. has been behind other countries. Paper checks still account for 42% of payments disbursed by organizations, according to AFP research. The ubiquity of checks, inertia, and in some cases, tradition, continue to hold U.S. B2B payments back.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, payment digitization became even more essential. And since B2B payments are moving away from paper checks, then it only makes sense to complete those transactions as quickly and cheaply as possible.

Real-time payments leverage modern technology, especially APIs, as they transmit data instantly without the need for file downloads. By complementing real-time payments with automated bank account validation and payment policy screening corporates can set aside suspicious transactions for review while all other payments travel seamlessly. The value of payments modernization, including embracing real-time payments, lies in the endless possibilities it will bring to your future business growth.

Conclusion

Don’t dismiss real-time payments simply because they are new. Kyriba offers the most comprehensive coverage of real-time payments globally and we have taken an API-first approach, allowing CFOs and treasurers to inject real-time data-driven decision making into all financial operations. Whether you are an existing customer seeking to introduce real-time payments into your payment mix or a prospective customer seeking to digitize payments and treasury operations, we are ready to assist you in your journey. Contact us today.

Status of Real-time Payments Globally

Status of Raal-time Payments Globally

Source: Prime Time for Real-Time ACT Worldwide,2022

Click here to view all blogs by Kyriba

Footnotes:

  1. Calculated total cost for issuing a paper check on a per Item Basis (in-house or outsourced)
  2. Calculated total cost for receiving a paper check on a per item basis
  3. Initiating and receiving ACH transaction (internal and external costs)
  4. The median transaction cost for initiating and receiving RTP payments on a per item basis
  5. Calculated cost for sending and receiving wire payments on a per-item basis
  6. Total calculated cost for outgoing payments made (including personnel, IT technology, compliance, audit, etc.) via a card (procurement, T&E, and virtual) per transaction
  7. The internal median cost range for receiving credit card transactions (including personnel, IT technology, file connectivity, encryption, audit, PCI DSS compliance, etc.)
  8. The external median cost range for receiving credit card transactions (including issuer/acquirer/processor interchange, assessment, monthly fees, etc.)