Nicolas Christiaen on TIS’ acquisition of Cashforce

06-07-2022 | treasuryXL | TIS | CashForce | LinkedIn |

Would you like more insights into TIS’s acquisition of CashForce? Hear from Nicolas Christiaen, CEO and founder of Cashforce, as he describes the inherent synergies between the two companies and what may subsequently be accomplished as a result of the acquisition.

Watch the video below to hear from Nicolas

 

 

“Our best-of-breed solutions are very complementary to each other: Being that natural synergy”

 

 

 

Nicolas Christiaen, CEO and founder of Cashforce

 

TIS acquires Cashforce, an AI-powered provider of cash management and forecasting solutions.

17-06-2022 | treasuryXL | Cashforce | TIS

 

Revolutionizing Global Liquidity Management for Treasury and Finance

 

Treasury Intelligence Solutions (TIS), a global leader in enterprise payment optimization, today announced their acquisition of Cashforce, an AI-powered provider of cash management and forecasting solutions.

This acquisition will see Cashforce’s leading cloud solution – currently deployed at many of the largest and most sophisticated corporate treasuries in the world – become integrated with TIS’ SaaS payments platform. This unified solution will provide enterprises with an unmatched suite of capabilities for cash management, global payments, and fraud mitigation along with superior connectivity, workflows, and reporting functions.

Over the past few years, TIS and Cashforce have collaborated closely to provide a complementary offering for treasury and finance teams. These efforts were met with immediate success in the market as demand for improved cash management and forecasting tools has risen sharply. Now, TIS’ acquisition of Cashforce presents the perfect opportunity to integrate both products together as part of a more complete offering.

For the thousands of enterprise treasury and finance practitioners who currently use TIS, this acquisition provides access to faster and more accurate cash reporting, forecasting, and working capital management. To date, cash positioning and forecasting are still being performed manually by many treasury groups, which represents a major pain point for CFOs and business leaders when attempting to make strategic financial decisions. However, the robust capabilities provided by Cashforce eliminate many of these inefficiencies and ultimately enable companies to gain quick and accurate insights into their financial position based on reliable payments and liquidity data.

According to Erik Masing, Group CEO of TIS, “Cashforce has been a premier partner of TIS for several years and has contributed significantly to the cash forecasting and management capabilities we offer clients. The acquisition is a natural extension of our business and will allow TIS to further integrate Cashforce’s solution with our platform in order to offer advanced forecasting and data management capabilities to all our clients. This means enterprises can significantly reduce complexity in their global payments and cash management tech stacks by leveraging standardization and transparency afforded by a single, elegant solution.”

 

 

For Cashforce, the acquisition means that existing clients can now supplement their robust forecasting capabilities with TIS’ industry-leading payments and bank connectivity features. As explained by Nicolas Christiaen, Founder and CEO of Cashforce, “Giving businesses complete visibility over their cash and liquidity data has always been the core objective of Cashforce. While we have spent years perfecting our capabilities in this regard, TIS has been strengthening their suite of payments, bank connectivity, and cash management tools. When combined, these two sets of capabilities form the ideal solution for global treasury and finance teams to achieve full control and visibility over their entire payments and liquidity architecture – including all entities, back-office systems, and banks.”

With the added capabilities of Cashforce’s solution, TIS now offers a single, scalable cloud platform for clients to address needs in the following areas:

  • End-to-end payment processing and bank statement management
  • Global bank connectivity and financial messaging
  • Real-time cash positioning and liquidity management
  • Multifaceted cash forecasting, cashflow analytics, and working capital management
  • Bank account management and bank documentation management
  • Payment compliance and sanctions screening control
  • Treasury security, regulatory compliance, and fraud mitigation tools

For more information on TIS’ acquisition of Cashforce and the advantages our combined solution will provide to enterprise treasury, finance, and executive teams, contact us at [email protected] or by using the information found on our website.

 

About TIS

TIS is reimagining the world of enterprise payments through a cloud-based platform uniquely designed to help global organizations optimize payments, manage cash visibility, and mitigate risk. Corporations, banks, and business vendors leverage TIS to transform how they connect global accounts, collaborate on payment processes, execute outbound payments, analyze cash flow and compliance data, and improve critical outbound payment functions. With $2 trillion in payments processed annually, the TIS corporate payments platform helps businesses improve operational efficiency, lower risk, manage liquidity, gain a strategic advantage – and ultimately achieve enterprise payment optimization.

Visit us for more information at https://www.tispayments.com.

 

 

 

 

Build vs Buy: How Should Treasury Teams Upgrade Their Bank Connectivity & Payments Stack?

15-06-2022 | treasuryXL | TIS | LinkedIn |

This blog highlights the primary considerations that treasury and IT teams must make when determining whether to build custom in-house bank connectivity and payments solutions or contract the services and software of a specialized 3rd party vendor. After evaluating the main benefits and drawbacks of each option, we provide a list of helpful questions for practitioners to consider as they decide whether building or purchasing a solution best suits their needs.

Source

How Does the “Build vs Buy” Debate Typically Surface Within Organizations?

In today’s remote and digitally operated business environment, it’s no secret that organizations have grown deeply reliant on technology to manage and automate their core treasury and finance functions.

Realistically, a “modern” company operating in 2022 will be doing business through a myriad of banks, accounts, currencies, and entities. They will also likely have hundreds or thousands of vendors, partners, and customers within their network. As a result, digital payments and cashflows are moving in and out of the business constantly, and every movement must be monitored and controlled by treasury teams that often consist of just a few employees.

Because of treasury’s limited personnel bandwidth, any issues with adopting the right bank connectivity and payments stack to automate their core operations almost always lead to excess complexity and manual strain. It can also result in significant security and compliance gaps, along with general inefficiency across crucial processes like transaction processing, liquidity management, balance reporting, and cash forecasting.

But while most treasury and IT groups today can agree that developing a robust connectivity and payments stack is critically important, each internal stakeholder will likely have their own idea regarding what the “best-fit” version of this technology stack actually looks like.

Why is this?

As companies grow over time, the systems they use to manage payments and connect with their banks must evolve accordingly. Because managing a few bank accounts and transactions in a single country and currency is a fundamentally different task compared to managing dozens of banks, hundreds of accounts, and thousands of payments across numerous countries and currencies, companies cannot rely on the same solutions and structure they’ve always used to sustain them as they scale.

Instead, in order to maintain compatibility with new payment formats and channels like ISO 20022 and SWIFT GPI, connect with regional payment networks like NACHA and EBICS, or accommodate custom bank connectivity protocols (Host-2-Host / SFTP, APIs, etc.), growing enterprises will inevitably reach a point where their existing payments and banking architecture must undergo a significant overhaul.

Complexity grows as you scale. Scaling from just a few bank accounts, back office systems, and funds transfers being executed in a single country to managing dozens of international banks and systems, hundreds of accounts, and thousands of payments globally requires a drastically different tech stack for treasury.

However, as this evolution occurs and internal stakeholders recognize the need to upgrade their connectivity architecture, disagreements often arise over which vendor or “type” of solution is the best fit. Given that there are hundreds of available 3rd party solutions that could potentially address treasury’s requirements, as well as a variety of internally developed applications that could be created and deployed by IT teams, it is common for different stakeholders to have contrasting views over which option is the smartest choice.

This is where the “Build vs Buy” technology argument most frequently comes into play.

 

Understanding Both Sides of the Build vs Buy Argument

As organizations recognize the need to upgrade their payments and connectivity capabilities, there are two main approaches they could leverage to address the issue. The first is to use internal IT resources and expertise to build a customized solution for treasury, and the second is to purchase a specialized solution from a 3rd party provider.

But which option is the best choice?

Let’s quickly review the key benefits and drawbacks of each option.

The Pros and Cons of Building vs Buying a Treasury Solution

Building an Internal Connectivity Solution

Organizations that prefer to create their own custom connectivity solutions internally using IT resources and expertise will likely have a greater ability to customize the offering in a manner that best addresses all their needs. To date, several prominent ERPs offer modules or plugins that give  IT staff the ability to build custom formats and configure their own connectivity protocols. However, this option requires a significant amount of bandwidth and maintenance from treasury and IT teams, as well as a high degree of expertise and technical prowess to support the solution over time. The below pros and cons list highlights this reality in more detail.

PROS

  • IT and Treasury teams know firsthand what the main requirements and preferences are.
  • Support and maintenance for the solution can be handled internally.
  • The solution can be customized to fit the exact needs of the enterprise.
  • Complexity and redundancy regarding unnecessary features are kept to a minimum.

CONS

  • IT and treasury teams may not have the bandwidth to build their own internal solution.
  • Fixing bugs and patches requires internal support, which is not always readily available.
  • Not all internal teams have the expertise required to build complex connectivity solutions.
  • Supporting the need for new formats and connectivity protocols requires more custom work.
  • Scaling over time requires constant upkeep and maintenance from internal resources.

Adopting a 3rd Party Connectivity Solution

Compared to building an internal solution, adopting a 3rd party connectivity and payments solution usually requires less of treasury and IT’s time, and there is less effort required to develop, implement, and maintain the solution. However, there is also the chance that this solution will require the purchase of redundant or unnecessary features. At the same time, improper or incomplete implementation of a 3rd party solution can cause severe integration, security, and compliance issues over time. More about these pros and cons are highlighted below.

PROS

  • IT and Treasury teams have a minimized role in the solution’s implementation and upkeep.
  • Dedicated customer support staff can help resolve issues and requests.
  • Updates and patches are normally handled externally by the vendor.
  • Specialist functionality is pre-packaged to address best practices in connectivity and payments.
  • Liability on the company to maintain, host, and secure the solution is largely outsourced.

CONS

  • Specific customization of the product for treasury teams cannot always be assured.
  • Reliance on 3rd party vendors for support and upkeep may result in delayed responses and feedback.
  • Tech complexity can quickly escalate if companies start adopting numerous 3rd party solutions to manage various functions, especially if they do not integrate well with one another.
  • Using external solutions for data and payments can create additional security risks and compliance issues.

 

As showcased by the above bullets, a company’s decision to build or buy its payments and connectivity solutions should always depend on its unique circumstances. For instance, a company with sufficient IT personnel and internal expertise might have the bandwidth to create and maintain a solution on its own. However, if treasury and IT teams are already exasperated with their current list of responsibilities and don’t have the time or expertise necessary to create and maintain their own solution, it probably makes more sense to begin evaluating the services of a 3rd party provider.

For treasury teams who are presently evaluating their options and need help deciding on the best course of action, the following considerations will help provide more clarity during the decision-making process.

Elements to consider when evaluating build vs buy

 

A Checklist to Walk Through When Deciding to Build or Buy Your Next Connectivity Solution

1. Validate the Need for New Technology

Many organizations have their eye on new technology before identifying any legitimate business need. Sometimes this “cart before the horse” approach is due to rigid business processes, lack of technical knowledge, or pure product hype. Decision-makers are very often awed by product suite success stories, dynamite product demonstrations, and industry analysts’ evaluation of technology—even when they haven’t formally identified a need for the technology.

To avoid these pitfalls, treasury and IT teams need to first validate the need for upgraded connectivity and payment protocols, prior to even beginning to evaluate which solution makes the most sense.

Last, but not least, tech leaders need to provide an estimated return on investment (ROI) for any new solution, along with a description of how ROI will be measured. It is surprising how many programs are initiated without considering ROI or added business value upfront. Many of these projects consume a lot of budget and time before leaders realize that either the solution will not add value or there is not a legitimate business need.

 

2. Identify Core Connectivity & Payment Requirements

In large organizations, pinpointing core connectivity requirements is often easier said than done. Still, it is a critically important step to take before deciding to implement a new solution. A core business requirement is one that must be supported by the solution to continue functioning as intended. For multinational organizations, core connectivity requirements may involve compatibility with numerous format types (EDI, BAI, SWIFT MT, ISO 20022, etc.) as well as numerous bank channels (SWIFT, H2H, EBICS, etc.) and back-office integrations (APIs and plugins for ERPs or TMSs).

Although determining treasury’s exact connectivity requirements may be difficult, it is extremely important to identify these core functional requirements first—not technology or design requirements. This is the only way to ensure unnecessary or redundant functionality is not purchased erroneously, and also ensures that critical requirements are never accidentally overlooked and unaddressed through whatever solution is ultimately chosen.

 

3. Consider Your Technology Architecture Requirements

Going a step further than the above point, it’s safe to assume that organizations are already using technology to enable other business processes. To reduce the cost and liability of this technology, your organization has also likely adopted standards related to how internal solutions are implemented and maintained.

As such, it is extremely important to identify any architectural requirements or standards that a solution must adhere to before determining if a 3rd party solution or an internal solution is the best choice. Some factors that may restrict the solution choice are as follows:

  • Information security strategy, compliance policies, and privacy standards (SOC 1 & 2, GDPR, etc.)
  • The state of current / planned systems with which the solution will be interfacing
  • What the preferred hosting structure is for the new solution (on-premise, SaaS, etc.)
  • Type and complexity of integrations that must be supported by the solution
  • Operating systems in use by the organization and their partners/banks/customers/entities

 

4. Examine & Evaluate Existing Solutions FIRST

At this point, a business need has been pinpointed, ROI has been estimated, and both core business and architectural restrictions have been identified. Leaders should now take a good look at existing systems.

It is not uncommon that different departments or entities of a large, global organization are not aware of what systems exist in other areas of the company. As a result, businesses will often implement multiple versions or forms of the same technology, only to discover that another system within the organization could have supported treasury’s new requirements with little to no modification. Thus, before deciding on the “best-fit” solutions approach, you should determine if any existing system(s) within the organization can be easily scaled or extended to meet your business need.

 

5. Compare In-House Expertise & Bandwidth Relative to Current AND Future Capabilities Required

One major factor that can significantly reduce the ROI of a custom-built solution (and in many cases, ultimately causes the project to fail) is the lack of available personnel with proper skill sets. In reality, the process of designing and deploying custom connectivity solutions that are both scalable and extensible is a massive undertaking for both treasury and IT. Unless one of your business areas is product development or you have an abundance of available IT support, there is an extremely high probability that your operations and maintenance technology resources will not be able to build, sustain, and support an internal solution, especially as new needs and requirements arise over time.

It is never profitable to let personnel gain these skills and experience by developing business-essential systems. Yet, more often than not, decision-makers see the short-term cost differences between an internally-built vs 3rd party solution and decide to try and build their own in order to save money. However, unless you’re supremely confident in the skillsets and bandwidth of both your treasury and IT teams, this option is not recommended.

 

Why TIS is the Ideal Provider for Global Payments, Liquidity Management, & Bank Connectivity

Ultimately, any organization evaluating whether to build or buy its next solution will have to closely analyze its own operations in order to make the best decision.

In cases where organizations require support for a complex array of payments and bank connectivity protocols and are open to considering a 3rd party vendor, they should closely evaluate the capabilities provided by TIS.

The cloud-based, fully-supported platform provided by TIS offers a global, multi-channel, and multi-bank connectivity ecosystem that streamlines and automates the processing of a company’s payments across all their global entities and systems. By sitting above an enterprise’s technology stack and connecting with all their back-office, banking, and 3rd party solutions, TIS effectively breaks down department and geographic silos to allow 360-degree visibility and control. To date, the ~200 organizations that have integrated TIS with their global ERPs, TMSs, and banking landscape have achieved near-100% real-time transparency into their payments and liquidity. This has benefitted a broad variety of internal stakeholders and has also enabled them to access information through their platform of choice since the data that passes through TIS is always delivered back to the originating systems.

 

TIS Simplifies Global Payments & Liquidity

Because of the deep connections that TIS maintains with internal systems such as ERPs or TMSs, external banks, and 3rd party vendors, the process of managing payments is simplified for every internal stakeholder. C-suite executives, treasury, accounting, AP, legal, HR, and other key personnel can access whatever financial data they need, exactly when they need it. And by automating this flow of information for both inbound and outbound payments, TIS provides the control and flexibility that enterprises need to function at their highest level.

Finally, with the global payments data we have amassed and the decades of experience our team has in orchestrating enterprise payments, we are uniquely equipped to help enterprises accurately benchmark their payments performance and provide tailored advice on how to optimize, grow, and mature. Ultimately, this rich data and deep experience are what enable us to continually provide industry-leading payment solutions and support to our enterprise customers.

In the digital world of enterprise payments, TIS is here to help you reimagine and simplify.

For more information about how TIS can help you, visit our website or browse our latest resources!

Fraud Check Up

17-05-2022 | treasuryXL | TIS | LinkedIn |

Fraud as a threat: Evaluate your risk!

Source

Record high of fraud threat level: 87% of professional treasurers from companies and banks worldwide have perceived an increase in fraud threat in comparison to the year before. * Attacks on companies have intensified significantly, threatening all processes of financial transactions and payment relevant courses.

Additionally, due to the rapid change to remote work since the start of the pandemic, security strategies have undergone the greatest stress test. New and secure means are available and necessary to protect your company against rapidly evolving fraud schemes.

 

Is your company at risk? Find out now by answering a couple of questions.

* Strategic Treasurer – 2021 Treasury Fraud & Controls Survey Report

TIS Global Payments Peak

12-04-2022 | treasuryXL | TIS | LinkedIn |

TIS invites you to this virtual event. Get to know the product roadmap for 2022, the TIS Enterprise Payment Optimization story and much more.


TIS invites you to join us for our annual event, Global Payments Peak, on April 28th at 2:30 PM CET.

 

Enjoy an afternoon full of information and networking on our event app as we reflect on our vision and product roadmap for 2022. Get the opportunity to hear from our customers how they use our solution to build defences against payment fraud.

  • Register today and find out about our vision and product roadmap for 2022.
  • Hear news from TIS, engage in sessions with existing TIS customers as well as industry experts.
  • Learn what Enterprise Payment Optimization is and how TIS can help your company to optimize its payment processes.

We will reveal an agenda in due course. Stay tuned for more information

Ready to get started? Register now.

SAP Integration with the SAP Add-on

24-03-2022 | treasuryXL | TIS | LinkedIn |

Outsource the technical challenge of bank connectivity to a payments expert.

Benefits of integrating TIS with our certified SAP Add-on

For many SAP clients, bank connectivity is a technical challenge. Find out, how integrating SAP with TIS can help you:

  • Replace fragmented data streams with a unified interface for all payments
  • Significantly improve your bank communication
  • Ease the technical integration of an in-house bank with TIS and SAP Advanced Payment Management (APM)

 

The SAP Add-on is available for all systems (SAP ByDesign, ECC6.0, S/4HANA on-premise, public cloud and private cloud).

Download the free Fact Sheet

 

WEBINAR ALERT | Connectivity – The Key to the Future and Digital Transformation

24-02-2022 | treasuryXL | TIS | LinkedIn |

Date: Tuesday, March 8, 2022

Time: 4:00 PM – 5:00 PM CET

Time: 10:00 AM – 11:00 AM ET

Taking a look at a dictionary, connectivity in computing is described as “the ability of systems, platforms and applications to be connected to each other”.

But what does this mean for payments in particular and how can you benefit from it?

Register today for this webinar and hear Erol Bozak, CPO, Jacques Yana Mbena, Head of PreSales Europe, and Jonathan Paquette, VP Solutions US, talk about:

  • What are the differences between integration and connectivity?
  • What types of connectivity are there and why is there such complexity?
  • How to simplify connectivity in order to achieve growth and change
  • Real-life examples of how TIS connects clients to providers and banks
  • How TIS can help your company to achieve growth and change in the Digital Age

 

We are very much looking forward to meeting you online: Register here.

Why APs Stake in Enterprise Payments is Important, but Often Overlooked

27-01-2022 | treasuryXL | TIS | LinkedIn |

This article reviews the reasons why an Accounts Payable (AP) team’s stake in managing enterprise payment and reconciliation activity is critical for large companies before examining why AP departments do not always receive the internal prioritization or attention they deserve as enterprises make payments and financial technology investments. Finally, this article concludes by evaluating how the TIS platform equips AP — along with treasury, finance, accounting, and other internal groups, to manage and control each of their respective functions regarding enterprise payments within the solution of their choice, thereby largely eliminating the need to pick and choose which departments receive budget or funding.

Context: What role do AP departments play in managing global payments?  

For those who may be unfamiliar or need a quick refresh, the general role of an Accounts Payable (AP) department is as follows: 

When a company purchases goods and services from a supplier or vendor on credit, the accounting entry is referred to as an Account Payable (AP). On a balance sheet, it appears under current liabilities. As such, an enterprise’s AP department is responsible for ensuring these payments owed by the company arrive to suppliers and other creditors in a timely fashion. 

Depending on the company’s size and scope, the AP department may consist of just one or two individuals, or up to several dozen. Most of the time, AP staff operate as a subset of the finance department and work within an ERP or similar technology solution to manage the company’s global payables (i.e. supplier or vendor invoices) and ensure that outbound payments are generated and executed according to the outstanding payments that are due to these parties. 

As AP groups go about managing their roles, the main benefit to their organization is that outstanding payment requests are effectively fulfilled without violating deadlines or contracts. There is often a vendor relationship aspect attached to this benefit as well, provided that invoices are paid on time. Additionally, an optimized AP group can help take advantage of early-pay discounts or other types of incentives to earn additional revenue, and can also help identify fraudulent invoice requests and other security threats. For enterprises making hundreds or thousands of payments every week, these benefits are essential. 

Five Quick Facts About Accounts Payable

However, despite the important role that AP groups play and the critical nature of their work, the reality is that their needs are rarely prioritized over other financial stakeholders and departments internally.

Let’s explore further.

 

Why don’t AP departments receive more budget & attention internally?  

As an enterprise’s financial priorities and initiatives get championed by internal executives and leaders, who is most commonly advocating for AP?

In other words, which of an enterprise’s chief financial stakeholders are actively prioritizing the needs of the AP department relative to other internal departments and groups?

Although some AP managers or directors might get a say in largescale technology projects and Controllers or Treasurers may work closely with AP to ensure process cohesion, the reality for many enterprises is that AP departments rarely have a high-ranking executive or financial stakeholder that resides directly within their team.

For example, while the Treasurer often can communicate directly with the CFO and accounting groups have directors that are given a direct line for influencing important decisions, the AP group does not.

Of course, this is not to say that the AP department is always getting completely overlooked, and to be fair, other financial departments like Procurement might suffer from a similar conundrum, depending on the structure of the enterprise. However, in cases where the AP group is clearly outranked by other stakeholders, the impetus is on leaders in treasury and accounting, as well as the CFO directly, to ensure that their needs and priorities are addressed.

As noted above, the benefits of helping AP optimize its function include increased revenue and cost savings through early payment opportunities like dynamic discounting. With the right technology and workflows, AP can also play a critical role in detecting fraudulent invoices and payment requests and maintaining the organization’s good standing regarding vendor and supplier contracts and relationships.

Five Benefits of a Fine-Tuned AP Group

For enterprises that are able to address AP’s needs in an effective fashion, the above benefits can be instrumental in boosting revenue, maintaining accurate financial records, and preventing fraud. However, without the proper attention, these benefits can quickly dissipate and result in a myriad of issues. This is especially the case if AP is not provided with the right technology solutions or integrations to perform their duties, as detailed further below.

 

Addressing the technology requirements of accounts payable 

Upon examining the typical financial responsibilities that AP teams manage, the reality is that their technology needs are not that different from other financial groups, especially those of accounting.

In most cases, enterprises will have at least one (if not multiple) ERP system deployed globally. These ERPs often provide the perfect backdrop for AP to function, as global financial data can flow directly into these platforms to make for easier oversight and control. In circumstances where enterprises have strategically developed their financial technology stack to optimize the data flowing into these ERPs, the AP department can subsequently benefit from access to the same information that accounting and other departments do. And as invoices, bank statements, and payment statuses flow from various entities, vendors, and banks into the ERP(s), tasks like payment generation and invoice matching become much easier for AP to automate and control.

However, without the proper bank connections, system integrations, or authentication and security settings, these ERPs and disparate technology stacks can quickly become the bane of AP’s existence and lead to more headache than efficiency.

Here’s why.

Five challenges caused by disparate AP tech

For global enterprises with dozens of entities and back-office systems, as well as thousands of suppliers, vendors, and bank accounts, gathering and disseminating global financial data in a timely fashion represents a massive undertaking. For many companies, issues start to occur when their ERP is not properly integrated with all their banks, vendors, or the corresponding systems at regional entities and units. Whether due to constant M&A activity, regular implementation of new solutions, or simply a lack of IT budget and bandwidth, maintaining all the right system connections requires constant upkeep.

To make matters worse, some AP groups today are still relying on Excel, email, or paper statements, which magnifies the challenges of meeting contractual deadlines, identifying false invoices, and successfully obtaining early-pay discounts and incentives.

Ultimately, scenarios where AP must manually pull invoices and bank statements to perform their duties or where they wait days or weeks to receive data from regional offices and banks can render the benefits of their department almost entirely obsolete. And in today’s fast-paced, highly-digital environment, the simple truth is that if your enterprise is struggling to locate and aggregate financial data, then you are likely significantly behind your peers in terms of AP process efficiency.

Given what we’ve seen with many AP departments lacking the internal status to advocate for better technologies and workflows on their own, and because many enterprises might not be willing to invest in an AP-specific solutions, the best option many companies have for meeting AP’s technology needs without exasperating their budget is to invest in payments and banking technologies that can streamline the collection, aggregation, and analysis of payments and finance data for ALL internal stakeholders.

Of course, departments like AP and accounting will likely end up doing the brunt of their work in an ERP. However, by adding a global payment and bank connectivity hub to their technology stack, enterprises can ensure that all the data these groups need to do their jobs can flow into the ERP in an optimized and timely fashion.

Today, these global payments optimization capabilities are exactly what TIS offers enterprises with our Enterprise Payment Optimization (EPO) platform. The manner in which our solution optimizes the AP function while also streamlining payments, liquidity, compliance, and banking functions for Treasury, Accounting, Legal, and more is highlighted below.

 

How TIS gives AP & all other financial stakeholders complete control over payments 

TIS’ Enterprise Payment Optimization platform is a global, multi-channel and multi-bank connectivity ecosystem that streamlines and automates the processing of a company’s payments and subsequent reporting across all their global entities, banks, and financial systems.

By sitting above an enterprise’s technology stack and connecting with all their back-office, banking, and 3rd party solutions, TIS effectively breaks down department and geographic silos to allow 360-degree payments and cash visibility and control. This includes visibility to executed vs outstanding transactions, as well as to cash positions and bank statements.

To date, the ~200 organizations that have integrated TIS with their global technology stacks have achieved near-100% real-time transparency into their payments and liquidity. This structure benefits a broad variety of internal stakeholders and also enables each group to access information through their platform of choice, since the data that passes through TIS is always delivered back to the originating systems.

This systematically controlled payments workflow is managed by TIS for both inbound balance and transaction information and outbound payment instructions. Data can be delivered from any back-office system via APIs, direct plug-ins, or agents for transmission through TIS to banks and 3rd party vendors. This means that for AP teams that use an ERP, payments and liquidity data is transmitted in near-real-time from TIS into their modules, where they can then perform automated reconciliation, payment generation, and other tasks as their role dictates.

Because of the deep connections that TIS maintains with internal systems such as ERPs or TMSs, external banks, and 3rd party vendors / service providers, the process of managing payments is simplified for every internal stakeholder. C-suite executives, treasury, accounting, AP, legal, HR, and other key personnel can access whatever financial data they need, exactly when they need it. And by automating this flow of information for both inbound and outbound payments, TIS provides the control and flexibility that enterprises need to function at their highest level.

For AP teams specifically, the extensive experience and unparalleled integration capabilities provided by TIS enable enterprises to streamline their methods for managing payments, invoicing, and reconciliation. Additional security controls, invoice inspection tools, and payment fraud alerts are implemented to ensure compliance and cohesion at every point in the process. And because the functionality provided by TIS helps all enterprise financial stakeholders, organizations that adopt TIS typically receive unanimous buy-in because each group recognizes the benefits they will obtain through TIS’ implementation.

In the digital world of enterprise payments, TIS is here to help you reimagine and simplify. For more information about how TIS can help you transform your global payments and information processes and optimize your AP function without breaking the bank, contact us to learn more.

benefits of TIS

 

Four Things Every CFO Should Know About Treasury

06-01-2022 | treasuryXL | TIS | LinkedIn |

This article is intended as a precursor to TIS’ latest whitepaper that highlights how CFOs can use their knowledge of the treasury function to spearhead initiatives that drive higher revenue, better financial decision making, and greater process automation and control. After reviewing how modern treasury groups typically operate, we will analyze the main benefits that a fully-optimized treasury team can provide to the CFO and an organization at large. To assess the full suite of data, insights, and commentary, download the whitepaper.

A CFO’s Summary of the Treasury Function

Although most CFOs will (or should) have a robust understanding of how the treasury function operates, let’s start with a quick synopsis for those who may be newer to the role.

At the highest level, treasury is a subset of the finance department that is responsible for safeguarding their organization’s most important asset (cash) as well as providing transparency and control over the day-to-day processes necessary for the company to meet its financial obligations (i.e. payments). This means that at its core, the treasury function most commonly performs:

  1. Cash and liquidity management
  2. Payments and bank account management
  3. Financial Risk, Fraud, & Compliance Management

Of course, certain treasury teams will have additional duties levied onto them depending on the size, complexity, and structure of their organization. For instance, cash flow forecasting, FX trading, debt and investment activity, and cash pooling or netting are all functions that commonly fall under treasury’s purview, but it ultimately depends on the specific makeup of their organization.

Moving beyond these core roles, however, it’s also important to note that treasury groups, even those at multibillion-dollar, multinational companies, often consist of five or fewer individuals. In fact, data from 2020 showcased that the average treasury size for U.S. organizations, regardless of company size or complexity, was just four personnel. Further data from 2020 shows that the majority of these teams are accustomed to working remotely, with team members often located across entirely different regions and time zones.

But while treasury staffing might be kept to a minimum, the best teams still manage to optimize their processes by relying heavily on technology automation instead.

In order to function at the highest level, modern-day treasury teams utilize a variety of digital technologies that range from bank portals and Excel spreadsheets to cloud-based ERPs and TMS platforms, payment hubs, business intelligence solutions, and many other specialty systems. In 2021, the majority of solutions that treasury teams use are SaaS-based and connect via APIs with other SaaS solutions in their company’s environment, including other back-office solutions as well as external partner, vendor, and 3rd party platforms.

Thus, for organizations that are smart about their hiring decisions and that leverage finance and treasury technology in a strategic and efficient manner, even the smallest of treasury teams can excel at their roles and boost financial productivity.

However, on the opposite end, organizations that either ignore or underutilize their treasury group can end up with significant gaps in their financial processes, particularly from a payments, liquidity, and risk management standpoint.

 

Four Things Every CFO Should Know About Treasury

Download our latest whitepaper to gain additional data, graphics, and commentary!

Access the whitepaper.

About TIS

TIS is reimagining the world of enterprise payments through a cloud-based platform uniquely designed to help global organizations optimize outbound payments. Corporations, banks and business vendors leverage TIS to transform how they connect global accounts, collaborate on payment processes, execute outbound payments, analyze cash flow and compliance data, and improve critical outbound payment functions. The TIS corporate payments technology platform helps businesses improve operational efficiency, lower risk, manage liquidity, gain strategic advantage – and ultimately achieve enterprise payment optimization.

Visit tis.biz to reimagine your approach to payments.

 

A Review of EBICS & One of Its Most Unique Payment Features for Corporates

08-11-2021| treasuryXL | TIS | LinkedIn

In the early 2000s, a team of German banks began collaborating on a project to simplify and harmonize corporate payment processes across Europe. After several years of development, the Electronic Banking Internet Communication Standard (EBICS) was released and has since become a critical component of Europe’s broader corporate payments infrastructure — particularly within Germany, France, Austria, and Switzerland. With regards to the EBICS protocol, one feature of particular interest to corporates is VEU – meaning “Verteilte Elektronische Unterschrift”. In English, the abbreviation EDS is used, which stands for Electronic Distributed Signature. In this blog, a technical summary and sample use case of EDS are provided in order to demonstrate the security and data quality-related benefits for corporates and banks. For more information on EDS, you can also download EBICS’ recent technical whitepaper, which is linked here (download the PDF marked “Final” and see page 148). 

A Recap of EBICS: 16+ Years of Bringing Structure to European B2B Payment Standards  

For those who may be unfamiliar, the Electronic Banking Internet Communication Standard (EBICS) is a German-based transmission protocol that helps regulate the standards and formats that many European banks (including those in France, Switzerland, Germany, Austria, and other regions of the Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA)) use for transmitting corporate financial and payments information between one another.    

When the EBICS standard was first launched in 2005, it aimed to create a more secure way for banks to manage corporate payments and data workflows across Europe. Although several other standards already existed at the time, EBICS has since proven to be a superior standard and has become the leading protocol for conducting corporate payments in Europe. Today, EBICS is also widely considered as the role model for progress towards standardized corporate SEPA payments.  

In the years following its formation, EBICS has continued releasing updates to their financial messaging and payment standards as the European business and banking landscape evolves. This is done in order to provide the highest level of data quality, security, and privacy for all the participants in a transaction, including the financial institutions, their corporate clients, and any associated vendors, suppliers, and partners.  

As part of these updates, EBICS introduced the Electronic Distributed Signature (EDS) – also known as Distributed Electronic Signature (DES) – to allow orders and transactions to be authorized by multiple users and participants, even if they are operating at different companies or in unique locations and time-zones.  

Using EDS, an order or transaction remains stored in an initiating bank’s processing system until either the necessary number of signatures with suitable authorization have been received, a time limit set by the bank’s computer system has been exceeded, or the order is cancelled by the responsible parties.  

This process was introduced by EBICS in order to strengthen the controls used by organizations and institutions for initiating and approving large or complex payments within Europe. Today, it enjoys broad usage throughout the SEPA region and is considered a standard practice when conducting B2B payments.   

Who Benefits from Using the EDS Capability?  

EDS is most helpful for organizations that have users and personnel working remotely, or from offices in diverse locations and regions. It is also advantageous for companies that routinely pay hundreds or thousands of suppliers and business partners and that are subsequently at a higher risk of payments fraud. In practice, EDS enables a broader degree of control and oversight on payments by allowing signers from any company, location, or branch to each independently verify and approve an order before it is processed by the bank. At the same time, using EBICS provides a greater level of underlying remittance data for each transaction compared to other payment standards, which aids the participating banks and corporates in confirming the exact nature and status of each order.  

Integrating EDS to a company’s banking and payment landscape is usually handled directly within the payment platform used for transmitting payment instructions to the bank. For instance, a corporate that uses a TMS for executing Euro payments could access the EDS standard directly in the TMS, but they would also be able to rely on the initiating bank for additional oversight. For each payment initiated through EDS, the rules of submission can also be customized, and the fulfillment can be tracked automatically by each party and signer. While processing the order, there are also designated pathways for viewing the order status and alerting inactive signers that the transaction requires their approval.  

Utilizing the EBICS EDS Capability Through TIS   

When combined with TIS’ other data, system, and payment security measures, using EDS adds an additional layer of control for our banks and enterprise customers, as well as their suppliers and partners. For organizations that maintain an active presence in Europe, utilizing the EDS capability is also recommended in order to remain compliant with EBICS’ latest standards for payment processing, data quality, and information security.  

More information about other security and data privacy tactics employed by TIS can be found here. 

For TIS customers, the EDS capability is available for EBICS payments as a standard service. This means that multiple users, even those from different organizations, can view and authorize one single order. It also enables the provision of the first and/or second signature for electronic payment transactions to take place from completely separate locations. The authorized signatory is thus able to check and authorize the payment transaction orders provided from other branches or systems directly within the TIS platform. Authorized users can find the Distributed ES (VEU) option under Administration > Bank Transaction Manager Settings > EBICS > Download Configuration; the orders will be visible in the BTM Monitor. 

The EDS-specific data available through TIS includes the number of outstanding signatures required before an order is processed, the list of approved and pending signatures, and also details regarding the timeframe for signatories to approve the payment before it is automatically halted by the bank. The underlying remittance information on each order is also provided to users through TIS as a standard service.  

However, this information will only be visible to authorized users that are responsible for overseeing and executing the relevant orders; these settings can be configured by admins in the TIS system.  

For our enterprise and multinational clients, EDS is particularly helpful in instances where the payment approvers are globally distributed (such as with remote finance and treasury teams), or when making supplier payments to a diverse range of beneficiaries. This is because signatories from all parties and locations can authenticate and verify each transaction before it is processed, thereby adding an additional layer of security to the standard payment approval process. These benefits have been particularly important for organization in the real estate industry, as the parties in a transaction are often distributed across multiple regions and there are commonly numerous stakeholders involved in each payment. An overview of how EDS has impacted real estate can be found in our recent whitepaper, attached here.  

About TIS

TIS is reimagining the world of enterprise payments through a cloud-based platform uniquely designed to help global organizations optimize outbound payments. Corporations, banks and business vendors leverage TIS to transform how they connect global accounts, collaborate on payment processes, execute outbound payments, analyze cash flow and compliance data, and improve critical outbound payment functions. The TIS corporate payments technology platform helps businesses improve operational efficiency, lower risk, manage liquidity, gain strategic advantage – and ultimately achieve enterprise payment optimization.

Visit tis.biz to reimagine your approach to payments.