BCR Publishing

We are the leading provider of news, market intelligence, events and training for the global receivables finance industry.

Working with industry leading organisations, experts, governments and universities, BCR Publications delivers expertise in factoring, receivables and supply chain finance to a global audience.

BCR has long been a beacon of innovation and excellence in the realm of receivables finance, playing an instrumental role in shaping the industry’s international landscape. Through its comprehensive conferences, insightful publications, and thought leadership, BCR has facilitated crucial dialogues and connections among industry professionals, driving forward the development of receivables finance globally.

Follow BCR Publishing

Free passes

For corporate treasurer roles/functions!

ARTICLES

Treasury Seminars in Antwerp and Montfoort – a short summary of two successful events

The last two Thursdays, the PowertoPay, SWIFT and TreasuryServices Treasury Seminar was held in Montfoort and Antwerp. We’re happy to say that it was a success! We got a lot of positive feedback during and after the seminars. Both had the same content but were hosted on two different days. The first one was held in Antwerp, Belgium on the 2^nd of March in an old monastery (Elzenveld). The second one was held in Montfoort, The Netherlands on the 9^th of March in the Heeren of Montfoort.

During the seminar several treasury topics were highlighted. After a short opening speech by Bas Huisman, co-founder of PowertoPay, we started with a presentation about the importance of bank independency. Arnoud Doornbos from Treasury Services was talking about financial history lessons but also the current financial situation that makes it really important for companies to look into bank independent solutions.
After that Rob Rühl from Next Markets presented his view of the influences of Brexit on the Dutch and Belgian economy.
Next was a presentation by Hans de Vries, PowertoPay consultant, telling about the end of Notional Pooling and Basel III. He also presented the Payment Hub of PowertoPay and how this is beneficial for companies.
After this Jan Vermeer from TreasuryServices talked about bank independent cash pooling through software, something TreasuryServices developed for companies who wish to operate much less dependent on their banks if it comes to cash management.
Last but definitely not least, we had a client case presented by Michel Steenbergen from DIF. He informed everyone about how the two solutions mentioned above come together in practice. DIF uses a combination of PowertoPay’s Payment Hub and TreasuryMetrics from Treasury Services and created a perfect solution for their complex cash management processes. After both of the seminars we had a drink and some food with the participants.

Our Treasury Seminar was a great opportunity to inform everyone about the current situation of the financial world and how to participate in changes that are occurring. Being bank independent is becoming increasingly important because of the fast development of financial technologies and changing laws. What we see lately is that components of banking products and services are being redeveloped by the FinTech Industry. These FinTech solutions are smarter, faster and better. As a result we now see that different FinTech companies work together. Individual Fintech products often turn out to be complementary to each other. FinTech companies now recognize that collaboration with other FinTech companies leads to high growth and a better product range.

PowertoPay – Claire van Ingen

Treasury Services BV – Arnoud Doornbos

[separator type=”” size=”” icon=””]

Toename SCF om werkkapitaal te financieren

| 14-3-2017 | Jan de Kroon |

Rond de Creditexpo verschijnen er tal van artikelen over de voor en nadelen van uiteenlopende ontwikkelingen rond het thema Supply chain financering (SCF). Zo publiceerde PriceWaterhouseCoopers (PwC) recent in verkorte vorm de uitkomsten van een gehouden onderzoek naar Reversed Factoring als alternatief voor werkkapitaalfinanciering van banken.

Het zal de lezer niet verbazen dat SCF in het algemeen en reversed factoring specifiek, hard groeien. Het is een nieuwe trend en dus is er ook een groeiende groep innovators en early adopters. Dat laatste echter vooral bij adviserende of toeleverende partijen in het proces. En dus met een zeker belang.

Waarbij ik overigens geen waardeoordeel geef; ik ben zelf ook adviseur.
Wel is het van belang iedere ontwikkeling en dus ook deze, te beoordelen op de werkelijke merites. Anders dan in relatie tot bancaire financiering heet het niet voor niets Supply chain financiering.

Belangrijk is te bedenken dat het juist daar van toegevoegde waarde is, waar de vertrouwensrelatie tussen leverancier en afnemer in de keten ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ is. Je hebt een relatie waarin je langer met elkaar optrekt als op elkaar ingespeelde ketenspelers. Omdat dat vertrouwen er is kan het ook zonder bank en omdat je het vaker met en voor elkaar doet, loont het ook er wat meer ‘(infra)structurele’ afspraken over te maken.

Dat houdt tegelijkertijd in dat als de connectie een minder frequente of regelmatige is, het instrument minder tot zijn recht komt. Mutatis mutandis geldt dat ook voor ‘reversed factoring’ als belangrijk SCF instrument. Anders dan reguliere factoring gaat het niet om het bevoorschotten op basis van de kredietwaardigheid van de verkoper, maar om het voorfinancieren van debiteuren in portefeuille op basis van hun kredietwaardigheid. Daarmee is het een alternatief voor die bedrijven die op basis van hun eigen kredietwaardigheid niet of moeilijk bij banken of factormaatschappijen terecht kunnen. Hoewel het wordt aangeboden door factormaatschappijen, kan echter ook een opvolgende ketenspeler hier zijn surplus cash voor inzetten. Met name dat laatste is interessant omdat op die manier er een zekere ‘disintermediatie’ plaatsvindt; de supply chain regelt het zelf buiten de financiële sector om en bespaart zich de tussenmarge.

Belangrijk is ons te realiseren dat SCF nu juist de ketenactiviteit en dus een zeker repeterend karakter benadrukt en de financiering daarop inregelt. Voor meer eenmalige transacties of transacties met minder regelmaat is SCF en daarmee reversed factoring vooralsnog minder geschikt. In dat soort gevallen is voorlopig de weg naar nieuwe start-ups als ‘Debiteurenbeurs’ meer geschikt. Daar kan een onderneming afzonderlijke facturen of incidentele liquiditeitskrapte op maat oplossen.

Jan de Kroon

Owner & Managing partner of I mprofin Groep

Managing treasury risk: Liquidity Risk (VI)

|13-3-2017 | Lionel Pavey |

There are lots of discussions concerning risk, but let us start by trying to define what we mean by risk. In today’s article I will focus on liquidity risk. Many companies have very significant credit needs and this needs to be formally addressed with a credit analysis procedure in place. In my former articles I dealt with risk management, interest rate risk, foreign exchange risk, commodity risk and credit risk. See the complete list at the end of today’s article.

Liquidity risk comes in 2 distinct forms – market liquidity risk and funding liquidity risk.

Market Liquidity Risk

This relates to assets and potential illiquidity in the market and, as such, can be considered a market risk. In a normal functioning market it is always possible for market participants (buyers, sellers, market makers and speculators) to find each other and negotiate a price for their transactions. Assuming that the transaction is of a normal market size, there should be no dramatic change to the price of the asset after the transaction.

At the time of a crisis, participants could be absent from the market, making it difficult – if not impossible – to trade an asset. Sellers are left frustrated as there are no opportunities to sell the asset they are holding and vice versa for buyers. This can occur due to a financial crisis, changes in legislature, scarcity of an asset or someone attempting to corner the market. An asset generally will have a value, but if there are no buyers in the market that value can not be realised.

Liquidity risk is not the same as falling prices – after all prices are free to rise or fall. If an asset was priced at zero then it means that the market considers its value to be nothing. This is different from trying to sell an asset but not being able to find a buyer.

Markets for Foreign Exchange, Stocks, Shares, Bonds and many Futures and other derivatives are generally highly liquid. Off balance sheet products related to physical settlement can be less liquid as there is a need to actually provide physical settlement. Bespoke products like CDO’s can be considered illiquid as their size is normally small (relatively speaking) and not freely tradeable. Also the complexity needed to value the product affects its liquidity.

Housing is an asset class with very low liquidity – sometimes a property could be sold as soon as it hits the market. At other times the same property could be available for sale for many years and the price reduced regularly, without attracting a firm buyer.
The easiest and quickest way to see if there is a heightened market liquidity risk is via the bid – offer spread. If this is suddenly seen widening, this would imply that there appears to be more risk. In a normal, liquid market, the spreads are fairly constant and small, allowing participants to easily step in and transact. A widening of spreads occurs in a normal market when government data is published – nonfarm payrolls, balance of payment, etc. Within a short time the market will return to a normal spread as the information is properly digested and the market makers return. However, if the spreads widen without a publication event taking place, it is reasonable to assume that the risk has increased.
Additionally, risk could grow if reserve requirements were increased. In markets such as Futures, it is necessary to pay margin to the exchange. If these margin payments were increased, this would lead to transactions being more expensive and so lead to less liquidity in the market.

Market makers can also observe the market depth. This is shown by the quantity available for transacting at a particular price in their order books. When a market is perceived as being deep, it means there are many orders and, therefore, a large number of orders would be needed to move the market price significantly. The deeper the market, the more liquid the market.

Funding Liquidity Risk

This relates to the risk of not being able to settle debts when they are due. Treasury specialists in a corporate environment are acutely concerned with funding risk. Every month wages must be paid, together with tax and social premiums (pensions, insurance etc.) Additionally, it would be advantageous to pay trade creditors on time. Future liabilities also have to be funded after they have been recognized. This could mean arranging external financing.

If there is a liquidity crisis in the market, it becomes difficult and expensive to arrange to borrow the necessary funds. The price may be so high that the intended profit provided by selling the goods, is negated by the increased cost of funding. A reduction in the credit rating of a company can also lead to increased costs and a reluctance to lend.
If a company is known to have problems making payments, then the liquidity risk is specific to the company – the rest of the market will function normally.

Funding risk can also occur if creditors fail to pay you, or if an unforeseen event has occurred that leads to an outflow of cash from the company.
A company can initially perform a quick spot check to ascertain its current ratio. This shows if a company can meet its current liabilities with its current assets. A ratio of less than 1 would imply that the company can not meet all its obligations at the same time. However, this could also be because there is no short term finance arranged at that moment.
It is possible to arrange a line of credit with a financial provider. He defines a maximum loan (line of credit) that can be extended which the company may utilize. While it is normal to pay a standing charge for the balance of the line that is not being used, this can be offset by the knowledge that it is possible to drawdown against the line when needed (in normal circumstances). There is greater flexibility with a line of credit than with a traditional bank loan.

Other methods include –

i) Sell assets like stock that are slow moving and tying down cash

ii) Analyse all overheads – office equipment, expense claims

iii) Increase efficiency in the debtors’ administration. Be proactive

iv) Renegotiate with suppliers – better that you talk to them before it is too late

v) Design contingency plans

vi) Subject your business to stress testing

vii) Apply the techniques of ALM (asset and liability management)

Some very well known companies have fallen to liquidity problems – Bear Sterns, Lehman Brothers, Northern Rock, ABN Amro, AIG, etc. While the risks were prevalent before the crises, the main liquidity problems occurred when it was determined that there was no more time allowed for the situation to remain.
Time is the soul of business.