BCR Publishing
We are the leading provider of news, market intelligence, events and training for the global receivables finance industry.
Working with industry leading organisations, experts, governments and universities, BCR Publications delivers expertise in factoring, receivables and supply chain finance to a global audience.
BCR has long been a beacon of innovation and excellence in the realm of receivables finance, playing an instrumental role in shaping the industry’s international landscape. Through its comprehensive conferences, insightful publications, and thought leadership, BCR has facilitated crucial dialogues and connections among industry professionals, driving forward the development of receivables finance globally.
Follow BCR Publishing
Free passes
For corporate treasurer roles/functions!
#6 Not having a Grip on Compliance (Dutch Item)
02-09-2021 | XE |
Regulatory compliance must be an absolute priority for all organisations involved in foreign exchange transactions with foreign customers and suppliers. You must implement robust procedures to generate the information that your foreign exchange providers must legally have in order to carry out transactions on your behalf.
Als u dat niet doet, loopt u het risico dat betalingen niet op tijd worden verwerkt, waardoor uw relatie met leveranciers en klanten onder druk komt te staan of zelfs uw toeleveringsketen verstoord wordt. Ook uw cashflow kan in gevaar komen. Ondanks deze noodzaak is vertraging door regelgeving een veelvoorkomend probleem bij vreemde valuta. Financiële instellingen moeten zich aan strikte regels houden wanneer zij valutatransacties uitvoeren namens hun klanten. Volgens wetgeving om witwassen en andere verdachte praktijken tegen te gaan, moeten zij de identiteit controleren van alle partijen waarmee ze zaken doen, waaronder de buitenlandse partijen waarmee uw bedrijf contact heeft. Vertragingen in het verificatieproces kunnen de uitvoering van uw transactie vertragen.
“Bescherm uw cashflow, uw toeleveringsketen en uw relatie met leveranciers en klanten.”
U moet ook oppassen dat u niet verstrikt raakt in onbekende buitenlandse bankgegevens. Bankgegevens in eigen land zijn gestandaardiseerd, maar internationaal kan dat van land tot land
verschillen en kunt u te maken krijgen met internationale rekeningnummers (IBAN), bankidentificatiecodes (BIC) en andere gegevens.
Uw valutaprovider moet u kunnen helpen deze potentieel verwarrende variaties te verwerken en tegelijkertijd de geldende regels na te leven. Worden er bijvoorbeeld online systemen gebruikt om de invoer van gegevens te automatiseren, waardoor fouten of ontbrekende gegevens snel ontdekt kunnen worden die anders uw betaling zouden kunnen vertragen? Geeft uw provider eenvoudig advies zonder gebruik van jargon over de gegevens die u nodig hebt van buitenlandse partijen en waar u die kunt vinden? Kan uw provider betaalgegevens in zijn systemen bewaren zodat u ze niet bij elke volgende transactie opnieuw hoeft in te voeren?
Als u niet precies weet hoe u ervoor zorgt dat u de regelgeving naleeft, bespreek dat dan met een gespecialiseerde valutaprovider.
Klik hier voor meer Info en Download WhitePaper
What to Consider When You choose your Bank Connectivity Strategy? 7 Important Criteria
| 01-09-2021 | treasuryXL | Nomentia |
Most organizations would benefit from some form of Bank Connectivity as a service. But just deciding on outsourcing bank connectivity won’t magically make all those connections appear. In this blog, we’ll cover 7 important criteria you should think of when evaluating different options.
1. In which banks do the majority of your payments flow?
Make a list of all banks that your organization is connected with and include all banking relationships from all your subsidiaries. We have noticed in interactions with our customers that this first step can be eye-opening at times. Often, we have an idea of the different banking relationships but then there are still local bank relations that might not be that visual to your treasury function. It also provides you with a good understanding of how many bank connections you would need and whether you would benefit from simplifying your banking landscape before implementing a bank connectivity solution. If your organization is only working with 5 banks altogether the story is very different from an organization that has relationships with 20+ banks.
After mapping this out, you might want to apply the 80/20 rule: typically, you would first set up connections to the strategic banks that cover 80% of your payment flows. A cloud-based software from a Cash Management specialist will most likely be able to provide you these connections as part of their out-of-the-box functionality.
2. Evaluate your use of local banks
Even if you expand the use of strategic banks to more countries, you might still find a set of local banks that you cannot replace. Typically, a discussion about bank connectivity increases in complexity when the long tail of local banks comes into play. That’s where you need to ask yourself why you are working with local banks. Is it for collecting money, for making payments from a regulatory point of view or because of specific needs within your local business?
Having visibility on Cash is straightforward while covering payment flows is not easily justified from a direct cost savings point of view. At the same time payment fraud plays a role in the local banks. You might want to consider a solution to replace internet banks for manual payments with a centralized solution. Then, the business case cannot be backed up by direct cost savings, but cost-efficient risk mitigation.
3. How consolidated is your banking landscape?
After mapping out all your banks in a first step, you know your strategic banks. Now it’s time to take a look at which countries are covered by these strategic banks. Would it be a good time to reduce your banking relations by using a certain set of strategic banks in more of your countries in order to reduce the number of domestic banks?
4. How many file formats and payment types do you have in use?
It is a different thing to set up credit notes and treasury payments only, as opposed to also including domestic payments, salary payments, and tax payments. We recommend having a solution for all your payment types and file formats: this is the only way to get rid of the internet banks and the tokens.
5. Are you concerned about payment fraud and information security?
You should have a solution to cover all payment types in all countries with all banks. That is the only way to have a full audit trail and control in every country. A centralized payment process enables centralized validation and control. We have covered the topic of payment fraud extensively.
In our case, having bank connectivity as a cloud service lets you benefit from a platform, which invests annually roughly 1bn$ in information security. From an information security perspective, this lets us concentrate on application-level security, which is annually audited by 3rd parties.
6. Are you interested in having transparency in your bank fees?
Modern bank connectivity solutions enable transparency in banking fees: Having bank agreements and the related fees included and matched against the banks’ reports. Even more transparency can be gained with services like SWIFT GPI: SWIFT GPI enables banks to provide bank fee information for the e2e chain. Not all banks support these features yet.
7. Choose wisely
Once you go through the questions and mappings outlined above you are at a good place in making your decision for the right bank connectivity provider. It might seem tedious at times and one might think of bank connections as a mere technical thing, but they are so much more. We feel this is a perfect moment to evaluate all your processes and look at ways to harmonize them.
It’s also a great way to work closely together with your colleagues. We recommend approaching this topic in a project team between treasury, finance and IT: From an IT perspective you want to minimize the IT-footprint, finance will run the daily operations and treasury sets the policies and controls.
DOWNLOAD OUR BANK CONNECTIVITY WHITEPAPER
$20 Billion in Bank Service Fees: Are You Overpaying?
31-08-2021 | treasuryXL | Gtreasury |
By Heena Ladhani, Ecosystem Manager, GTreasury
Twenty billion dollars. That’s how many corporate treasurers in the U.S. are now forking over to banks in service transaction fees every year. It’s a big number and it’s growing every year. But there’s also vast potential for reducing that amount by optimizing the outlay for-fee services and becoming better-informed for price negotiations.
A recent survey from Treasury Strategies determined that 70 percent of corporate treasurers are reviewing their bank service fees on a monthly basis. However, the same survey determined that a fraction – just 21 percent of treasurers – will actually benchmark those service fees as part of their bank analysis and management. Among those treasurers who do use benchmarks, many only do so on a line-item basis, rather than at the product category level. A majority also don’t have processes to recognize the impact of volume on benchmark prices. In short, there is room – a lot of room – for opportunities to trim costs.
Accurate bank fee analysis backed by correctly applied benchmarking enables treasurers to preserve strong relationships with bank creditors as well. Too often, simplistic benchmark techniques give treasurers only a surface-level analysis of whether fees are in line with market averages. As a result, treasurers may falsely challenge their banks over small sums, while missing out on more appropriate and fruitful interventions – a ‘can’t-see-the-forest-for-the-trees’ scenario. Incomplete analysis comes with its own costs, absorbing misapplied resources and eroding creditors’ goodwill over insignificant or erroneous concerns.
Let’s look at two examples of how benchmarking, done right, can ensure treasurers’ accurate analysis and lead to optimized bank transaction costs:
Example 1: Benchmark beyond what you know
Wire transfer fees are an area in which effective benchmarking is especially ripe for opportunity. For example, suppose a treasurer’s initial internal benchmarking finds that the four banks the company uses offer rates spanning from $14 to $20. This self-benchmarking reveals the potential to move all wire transfer fees to the $14 rate. However, expanding benchmark horizons to the market at large makes clear that all the banks are charging fees well above the median.
There is no shortage of potential reasons for this, which should be investigated. The company could potentially reduce fees by using a bank portal, streamlining Fedwire, SWIFT, or CHIPS costs, opting for digitized communications, and beyond. Importantly, though, a small cost on each wire can quickly add up to significant savings. By benchmarking these fees at a more expansive scope, those savings can be found, pursued, and realized.
Example 2: True treasury management services costs are multi-dimensional
Take a hypothetical corporate treasurer examining lockbox item processing fees at two different banks. Bank X charges $0.30 per item; Bank Y charges $0.50. The treasurer’s organization directs 500 items to Bank X each month, and 5000 to Bank Y. On the surface, the treasurer’s analysis is simple: Bank Y is overly expensive and should be challenged.
A deeper and more holistic analysis, however, clarifies a more accurate picture. Factoring in bundled remittance processing services – such as monthly lockbox maintenance, daily deposit ticket charges, image and hardcopy fees, and courier fees – rewrites the story. Now it’s clear that Bank X provides a per item rate of $4.00, but Bank Y is just $3.00. The more simplistic cost benchmark analysis missed this crucial information.
When it comes to bank pricing, treasurers also have a variety of options for optimization. For example, treasury could consolidate the lockbox items to Bank Y’s lower cost. It could then restructure processing at that bank to the market’s median price. Alternatively, it could request a bid from Bank Yon on the total volume and explore that offer.
Apply robust benchmark analysis across the board
The same process for optimizing bank offers and options based on complete and accurate benchmark analysis applies to all bank services used by corporate treasury teams. All transaction processing and information services should be put to careful scrutiny to see what savings may emerge. In this way, implementing the right treasury management strategy and processes to make robust benchmarking an integrated component of regular bank fee analysis is an investment that pays equally robust dividends.
Author: Heena Ladhani is the Ecosystem Manager at GTreasury, a treasury and risk management system. She is a FinTech professional with more than seven years of experience working with global clients to design solutions and improve processes utilizing treasury systems. She resides near Chicago.