Tag Archive for: FinTech

Interesting transfer Joop Wijn from ABN to Adyen

| 16-1-2017 | Pieter de Kiewit |

Joop WijnLast Thursday I attended a very interesting breakfast meeting about PSD2, organized by Alexander Huiskes of EY with support from DNB. I will write about this in a separate blog. Not being up-to-date on my Financieele Dagblad reading, I was surprised by the question what my opinion is about the transfer of Joop Wijn from ABN Amro to Adyen. I replied to my best knowledge, digested the question and decided upon this blog.

Not being involved at all, I think there are two aspects in this transfer: industry developments and his strategic career management. Fact is that Joop Wijn surprised us before with career changes from banking into politics and back.

We all know banks have to rethink their place in the value chain and their proposition. New services appear and replace traditional banking services. Also traditional services are executed better or cheaper by new suppliers. Adyen , as a payment services provider, offers a perfect example of these developments. Risk management within Fintech gets, just so, increasing attention. Topics like anti money laundering, authentication, fraud and hacking should be addressed. Not only because regulators want this but of course clients see this as essential. My first thought was that Joop Wijn is too senior, as board member of ABN, to be responsible just for risk. As risk management is essential, I can understand Adyen aims this high and Joop accepted.

From a strategic career perspective I have two assumptions. The first is that one of the motivators of Joop might be the impact he can have. Not being considered as chairman of a Dutch bank stops his career advancement, thus the possibility to increase his impact. Being responsible for a strategic topic within a global market leader in a growing market, might be more appealing. The second assumption is that he made a reshuffle of what is important. I often see this with candidates with a longer track record. This move might enable him to change his priorities.

Perhaps he will inform us about the above, perhaps he will keep this to himself. Fact is, it is an interesting career move.

Pieter de Kiewit

 

 

Pieter de Kiewit
Owner Treasurer Search

 

Blockchain: What happened during my stay in South Africa? (PART IV)

|13-1-2017 | Carlo de Meijer |

chains-iiAs you may remember I travelled throughout South Africa in december 2016. Being back home I was curious to learn if there were developments in the blockchain area. A first article was about a number of interesting reports that were launched and start ups. The second article dealt with banks and consortia. I focussed on central banks, market infrastructure and card schemes in a third article. In this last article I want to conclude my ‘blockchain journey’ with information about regulators and advisory companies. 

REGULATORS

EU Commission Launches Initiative to Boost FinTech and Blockchain Startups

The European Commission (EC) unveiled a new initiative aiming to support Europe’s FinTech and blockchain innovative entrepreneurs. The Start-up and Scale-up Initiative aims to combine all the possibilities that already exist in the EU, but plans on including a new focus on venture capital investment, insolvency law, and taxation.

With the unveiling of the Initiative, the Commission is hoping to bring together several factors to enable blockchain and FinTech startups to develop and grow their business across Europe. Aside from the proposed factors mentioned above other features that the Initiative is proposing include improved access to finance and simpler tax filings. Through the Initiative startups will also gain access to improved innovation support through reforms to Horizon 2020, which funds high-potential innovation through a dedicated SME instrument. The initiative will also connect startups with potential investors, business partners, universities, and research centers.

ADVISORY COMPANIES

Deloitte invests in blockchain Startup SETL

Professional services firm Deloitte has made an investment in London-based financial services blockchain startup SETL. By harnessing the capabilities of SETL’s blockchain, Deloitte can provide their clients with even more practical and transformational solutions.  News of the investment follows the announcement last month that Deloitte, SETL and Metro Bank had successfully trialed a contactless payment card using the firm’s distributed ledger technology. SETL is one of a number of startups worldwide looking to apply the technology to payment and settlement, and it recently became part of a regulatory sandbox initiative launched by the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority.

Deloitte has bet big on distributed ledger technology. To date, the firm has partnered with a range of startups in the space to develop blockchain prototypes. They have already been investing heavily in real-world applications, such as identity management, cross-border payments, loyalty, trade finance and a number of others. Deloitte is currently setting up an EMEA financial services blockchain centre in Dublin that will house a team of 50 developers and designers and is working with five prominent blockchain companies – BlockCypher, Bloq, ConsenSys, Loyyal and the Stellar Development Foundation – on a wide-range of proof-of-concept applications across the financial sphere.

PwC launched its Vulcan Blockchain Platform

Pricewaterhouse Coopers (PwC) recently launched its Vulcan Digital Asset Services based on blockchain technology. The Vulcan offering marks PwC’s continuing commitment to bringing blockchain technology to financial services and other industries. The Vulcan platform that connects identity, money and assets, allows users to spend, share, trade or track any physical or digital asset cheaply and quickly. It enables fintech start-ups and existing technology companies to gain access to PwC’s global client base and co-develop new product offerings. Vulcan’s digital currency services include digital asset wallets, blockchain-based payments (global payment processing), a digital asset exchange (investment and trading services), and rewards and loyalty programs. In addition, the platform provides governance and assurance services, including anti-money laundering, know your customer and reporting tools to ensure regulatory compliance.

PwC is already conducting several pilots in different industries that capture digitized assets and issue customer reward points as digital money. A global banking group and a central bank are piloting the system while an airline and three multi-national banks are also exploring it.

All parts of this article can also be found as a combined article on my LinkedIN page.

carlodemeijer

 

Carlo de Meijer

Economist and researcher

 

 

 

More articles about blockchain from Carlo de Meijer:

 

Brexit and the effects for treasurers

| 10-1-2017 | PowertoPay | sponsored content |

brexitBrexit is an ongoing issue in not just the financial world, but in the entire world. A topic which had lots of speculations, rumors and uncertainties. Although 2017 is going to bring us more clearness around Brexit, the exact date when Brexit is actually happening is still unknown. Theresa May, Prime Minister of the UK, said she will put Article 50 into motion by the end of March 2017. If she is able to put this article into motion, the actual process of withdrawal must be completed within two years. Anyhow, Brexit has its effects on the economy.

Netherlands and Belgium

Zooming in on the Netherlands and Belgium, Brexit will leave its marks as well. Because of extended research, Rob Rühl, director of Next Markets, is able to tell treasurers an update on what Brexit means for them. He is going to share his findings on a free Treasury Seminar, which is going to be held in the Netherlands and Belgium in the beginning of March. This seminar is hosted by payment specialized companies PowertoPay, TreasuryServices and the internationally known SWIFT. Since the results of article 50 going into motion or not are approaching, Rob Rühl will be able to update treasurers according to the latest developments. It’s important for treasurers to keep up with the latest developments to optimize their payment flows and thus to keep their businesses optimized. Or as Hans Leybaert, CEO of PowertoPay, looks at it; by focusing on smart Fintech solutions, platforms and ecosystems, you can create broad business opportunities that matter. Not just Brexit is interesting for treasures, but also think of topics as bank independency, cash management and Basel III which are important to learn about. More info and signing up for the seminar:  http://info.powertopay.com/sign-up-page-seminar

powertopay2PowerToPay

Claire van Ingen – Online Marketeer

[button url=”https://www.treasuryxl.com/community/companies/powertopay/” text=”View company profile” size=”small” type=”primary” icon=”” external=”1″]

[separator type=”” size=”” icon=””]

 

Will the European banks strike back?

| 27-12-2016 | Hans de Vries |

europe Last November The European Payments Council (EPC) launched the single euro payments area (SEPA) instant credit transfer (SCT Inst) scheme. The scheme will be live in November 2017 and allows the European banks to propose innovative, digital, and fast payment solutions to their customers. The EPC describes the SCT Inst scheme as “a world first, enabling individuals, businesses, corporates and administrations to make instant euro credit transfers between accounts across an international area that will progressively span over 34 European countries. This new scheme is a revolution for the traditional 9 to 5/ weekdays only operating banks. Will it also block the way to relative newcomers like Paypal? Will the banks seize this opportunity and strike back?

As a result of the internet experience, banks had to deal with the fact that their systems were not able to cope with the subsequent demands of the 24/7 demands of the retail market. Paypal attacked the weakspot of the banks by introducing their worldwide internet banking solution. Downside of this approach is of course the fact that the consumer had to first open and credit their Paypal accounts, before they were able to use  this payment method. And of course the merchants had to support this payment method as well and find ways to collect their funds. As an alternative creditcard payments were implemented and local solutions like I-Deal in the Netherlands, Mister Cash in Belgium etc. All these alternatives had their ups and downsides looking at costs and reachability. Most important value of these solutions were that the Merchant was to some extent sure that he received the funds before delivering the goods. And it worked both ways, the consumers were also sure that the goods would be delivered as soon as the transaction was finished.

With the upcoming introduction of the SEPA instant credit transfer scheme, as announced by the EPC last month, this whole picture is about to change. The EPC describes the SCT Inst scheme as “a world first, enabling individuals, businesses, corporates and administrations to make instant euro credit transfers between accounts across an international area that will progressively span over 34 European countries. This implicates that the consumers can directly debit their accounts and instantly transfer their funds to their beneficiaries all over Europe with the same effect as the current local schemes like I-Deal. This means that Internet Merchants all over Europe are by now reachable for the total European consumer market. Of course it will take some time before all banks are able to support this service and are also able to provide the consumers as well as the Merchants with the tools to obtain the information real time. However, the PSD2 regulations will certainly support this development and the FINtech industry will make sure that the information flows are connected to allow for flawless operations. By implementing the SEPA instant credit transfer scheme the European banks are able to recover lots of grounds they lost uptill now to external parties like Paypal: the banks will strike back! And they will have to in order to survive in today’s world.

hansdevries-150x150

 

Hans de Vries

Treasury/ Cash Management Consultant

 

We overschatten de snelheid waarmee de financiële wereld kan veranderen

| 7-12-2016 | Olivier Werlingshoff |

bankgebouwen‘We overschatten de snelheid waarmee de financiële wereld kan veranderen’ is de titel van een interessant artikel in het Financieele Dagblad van woensdag 30 november.

‘Grote financiële instituten omarmen massaal technologische vernieuwingen. Fintech is geen bedreiging maar een kans. Volgens fintech-goeroe Chris Skinner is dat vooral marketing. Traditionele banken hebben geen benul van wat er op ze afkomt en onderschatten de impact van nieuwkomers op de markt.’ Chris Skinner zegt vervolgens: ‘Tegelijkertijd onderschatten we de impact van fintech. Dat komt niet omdat er geen vernieuwingen zijn, maar omdat er een grens is aan de hoeveelheid start-ups en wat zij kunnen bereiken.’ Het volledige artikel is te lezen via deze link.

Wij  hebben onze expert, Olivier Werlinghoff, gevraagd om commentaar te geven en dit is zijn reactie:

Mijn mening is dat op het vlak van cash management heel veel fintech bedrijven gaan samenwerken met gevestigde banken. Het goede van fintech is dat ze met vernieuwende ideeën komen. Het grote voordeel inderdaad van banken is het vertrouwen, het kapitaal en niet onbelangrijk: een enorm klantenbestand!

Nadeel van fintech bedrijven is dat klanten overspoeld raken met nieuwe mogelijkheden en tussen de bomen het bos niet meer zien. Vaak hebben vooral de kleinere en mid-corporate klanten niet voldoende kennis in huis om een gefundeerde afweging te maken van het nut en de toegevoegde waarde van een fintech oplossing. Door te gaan samenwerken met banken kan vertrouwen worden verkregen en een enorme afzetmarkt.

Olivier Werlingshoff - editor treasuryXL

 

Olivier Werlingshoff

Managing Consultant at Proferus

Blockchain: how to make it operational in your company?

| 29-11-2016 | Carlo de Meijer |

block-chainToday, I was invited to participate in a Challenge meeting at the Euroforum Fintech event in Amsterdam. My challenge was the following. Suppose we are somewhat further in time. Blockchain is far beyond the hype, the initial overdone expectations have been brought to a more realistic level and the technology is generally accepted as having enough opportunities for the financial industry. Your company is convinced this technology will suit their business. A number of blockchain applications have been chosen to use in your day-to-day activities. That is the easy part.

Now the decision has been taken to adopt this technology, there comes a new challenge: how to integrate blockchain and implement this technology into the existing business and incorporate it within your legacy enterprise applications. In other words: how to make it operational!

Making blockchain work: the Challenges

That is where the real work starts. Making blockchain applications work in the real day-to-day world. That may prove as much of a challenge – or even more than that – as building the blockchain application itself. Because blockchain is a complete different and unprecedented, technology, corporates are confronting problems related to integration of the blockchain into the enterprise. Most financial organisations have to take into account their existing complex business lines and the legacy (and mostly old) technology they use. But also the various regulatory obligations have to be taken into consideration.
And there is another – maybe even bigger – challenge. Most banks nowadays heavily depend on massive and (capital-) expensive financial processing systems. These are often 15 years old (or even older!). But these systems do power the many transactions between the world’s major businesses and governments. Trying to overhaul them altogether is a formidable task, and may come with a huge risk. Disrupting them, even for a short time, could be disastrous.

Blockchain integration: points of attention

When deciding to integrate blockchain in your company, you should take a number of important issues into consideration. Every financial company that is serious about blockchain needs also to be serious about issues such as: compliance and regulatory requirements; Enterprise integration with internal systems and data repositories; connectivity to a partner ecosystem; interoperability requirements and access layer; visibility into—and real-time monitoring of—blockchain-based transactions; automated process orchestration; life cycle events; access controls; governance, and more.

Compliance and regulatory requirements

In the near term, KYC/AML models should be developed that could be integrated into enterprise blockchain. Without a thoughtful consideration of KYC/AML and other related regulatory applications, it will be a difficult story to realise that. These models should include concepts such as an inter-ledger, side chains etc. But in such a systematic way to take advantage of blockchain’s way of processing transactions. These models should enhance existing AML/KYC processes thereby overcoming shared data/ledger challenges.

Enterprise integration with incumbent internal systems and data repositories

Another consideration is: how to integrate blockchain with incumbent record systems. Corporates have been creating their own business systems to better measure and manage the business. These include issues such as reporting, analytics, business application management, dashboard, counter-fraud management, etc. Many of these systems “feed off” of the enterprise’s System(s) of Record (SoR) with all kind of information. Integration blockchain in an enterprise suggests a system design around integrated transaction systems (trust systems) and record systems (shared ledger); any application that is either transitioning or originating using blockchain technology would need to consider the enterprise systems for tangent business activity.

Interoperability and access layer

And there is the interoperability issue; may be the most important one. Interoperability of blockchain within an enterprise will be key. Every enterprise has legacy technology that must be interoperable with blockchain, from KYC to risk management and settlements. These applications have to engage seamlessly with the new blockchain applications. In order to make that possible, organizations need to use a so-called access layer to ensure complete interoperability. Such an access layer makes it possible to abstract the complexities of blockchain and smart contracts; expose the functionalities of the blockchain application; and, communicate them to legacy applications.

Automated process orchestration

Although private blockchain transactions occur in a closed environment, they however may impact events both inside and outside the chain. Technology is thereby critical to make these on-and off-chain applications interoperable in an automated fashion. Automated process orchestration is thereby needed, as it enables blockchain events to trigger processes across multiple off-chain and on-chain applications.

Life cycle event

Lifecycle events need to be managed too. Through a total surveillance module, the access layer has complete visibility of every event in the blockchain network; with that visibility the analytics engine can detect anomalies and gather intelligence. For example, when a counterparty exercises an option on a smart derivatives contract in the blockchain, that event needs to be captured and propagated to the same downstream systems. Similarly, external events, such as those relating to market data, will also need to be monitored and applied to the smart contracts. You will need to plan for integrating those systems. But before doing that you will have first identified what systems are affected and how.

Governance

And there is the governance issue. What happens in a blockchain application can have an impact across the whole enterprise. So careful monitoring off- and on-chain is necessary in order to enable proper governance, risk management and security of the entire network. Integration that is technology-neutral and the ability to establish and execute the policies required for good governance are key to the blockchain access layer. API-based integration could thereby be of help.

Other requirements

But here it does not end. New higher-level processes may also need to be established to exploit the benefits from the blockchain ecosystem. The interoperability between systems will have to be agile, secure and have robust governance. It should be prevented that enterprise applications would be exposed to any complexities of the blockchain. Operationalizing blockchain also addresses the need for access controls over the participants, from both an application and business context, be it internal or external to the enterprise.

Integration: steps to be taken

To gain the real advantages of blockchain technology, a company must be able to rapidly, but seamlessly utilize blockchain. Without having to run complex, costly and lengthy re-architecturing programs. But what is the best approach to operationalize blockchain?

Here are six steps you should keep in mind:

First, you need to connect to a (private or public) blockchain ecosystem and/or with external parties using the blockchain.
Second, you have to integrate blockchain applications with existing technology.
Third, you will have to decide how to interact with the blockchain ecosystem, with regards to security and access controls.
Fourth, you have to figure out how to monitor transactions and events on the blockchain and react to them in real time.
Fifth, you have to decide how to reconcile data that exists in blockchains as well as legacy applications.
Sixth, you have to automate, coordinate and manage the processes that span both existing technologies and blockchains.

Conclusion

While blockchain technologies are viewed as a disruptive force for the existing financial systems and market infrastructures and may fundamentally change the way the financial services industry operates day-to-day business, the challenges of enterprise adoption and integration need to be addressed as well.

The introduction of blockchain in your company will require the well needed time. You will have to address the enterprise issues around transaction audibility, visibility and integration into existing business functions. Without this, a profitable integration of the blockchain in the company will prove to be a difficult storey.

Of course this story is not yet complete. I will definitely have forgotten things that must also be considered. But this is a start!

carlodemeijer

 

Carlo de Meijer

Economist and researcher

 

New norms in banking: more than 30 new areas emerging. Pick your Fights!

| 28-11-2016 | Hans de Vries | treasuryXL |

motherboardWe came across an interesting ‘panorama’ from McKinsey& Company about the key Fintech trends and asked our expert Hans de Vries to comment on it. He came back with interesting insight, that we want to share with you:

Blockchain, PSD2, Bigdata, Crowdfunding, Bitcoins: never a dull moment in the banking world. The McKinsey Panorama provides a perfect overview of the rapid technological changes taking place in the banking world today. However it’s hard to predict the impact of all these developments on the day to day operations of the corporates. Over the years we have seen trends like the “Holy EDI Grail” never coming fully of the ground due to a lack of general acceptance and interoperability. Some corporates stepped-in really early and now finally reap the benefits as a result of a generic acceptance of for example XML standards for the information exchange. This does not mean that you’ll have to lean backwards and wait for the future developments to start materializing. The challenge is to keep moving forward while optimizing the internal processes according to the latest more or less standardized techniques. In some cases you may not be using the latest technical solutions, however you achieve the goals in a more practical way and it leaves room for further improvement on the way. The main message should be: don’t get overwhelmed by all these new developments, keep moving forward and pick your fights carefully.

hansdevries-150x150

 

Hans de Vries

Sales Consultant at PowertoPay

Kunnen banken zich opnieuw uitvinden of is het inderdaad Kodak revisited?

| 24-11-2016 | Jan de Kroon |

geen-naam

 

Dat alle banken op dit moment stevig ingrijpen in hun business model en bedrijfsvoering behoeft geen betoog. Het staat immers dagelijks in de krant. De topman van ING geeft zelfs openlijk aan dat zijn bank zich transformeert naar een IT dienstverlener en ING is dus een van die banken die aast op over te nemen FinTech-bedrijfjes om het transformatieproces te versnellen. Ook de andere banken switchen in hun businessmodel en voegen zich in de ratrace.

Situatie uit zicht van de bank

Als belangrijk argument geldt steeds de verzwaarde regelgeving die het steeds minder interessant maakt het traditionele rentebedrijf te voeren in combinatie met een toezichthouder die banken op dat punt in de nek hijgt. Een veel meer bemiddelende rol en een vergoeding op provisiebasis lijkt het logische antwoord. Tegelijkertijd wil je als bank wel een beetje grip houden en dus een belangrijke rol in het verloop van geldstromen houden. Om daar nog iets aan te verdienen moet je dan wel mee in de technologie. En dus mee in de uitdagingen die FinTech bedrijven bieden.

Juist daar lijkt de historische vergelijking met Kodak op te gaan, waar oprichter Eastman alle nieuwe technologische innovaties wilde omarmen, op voorwaarde dat een filmrolletje een vast onderdeel was van de oplossing. Ook banken transformeren zich waarbij een zekere constante te vinden is in het regisseren van geld en betaalstromen. En alle oplossingen lijken dan ook innovatieve Fintech inhoud te moeten hebben.

Intussen is het nog maar de vraag welke banken nog echt weten wat de klant wil en wat die klant echt nodig heeft. Zo buitelen banken over elkaar heen met beloften over binnen hoeveel uur een financieringsaanvraag wel niet uitgewerkt is en hoe makkelijk je online je zaken kunt regelen. Daarbij wordt verondersteld dat de klant dat belangrijk vindt. Het is niet dat dat de klant het niet op prijs stelt; die gaat ook met zijn tijd mee immers. Feit is dat het niet meer is dan een hygiënefactor en geen onderscheidend kenmerk.

De wens van de klant

Wat wil die klant dan wel; welnu die klant wil vooral aandacht en een goed advies. Die klant snapt dat de bank efficiënter wil gaan werken want die tendens is er in zijn eigen onderneming ook. Wat die klant daarentegen niet begrijpt is dat de te bereiken efficiencygraad vooral de winst van de banken moet gaan verbeteren in plaats van de vrijgekomen financiële capaciteit te besteden aan effectiviteit van de dienstverlening. Afgezien van wat technologische verschillen is er nu al geen wezenlijk verschil meer tussen de Nederlandse grootbanken in de klantbediening. In feite zoals dat bij de grote energieleveranciers al langer het geval is.

De zakelijke klant echt centraal stellen vraagt naar mijn mening vooral om het borgen van de oprechte aandacht voor de klant; one way or the other. Je terugtrekken op de technologie achter het IBAN nummer of vergelijkbare bewegingen zouden wel eens het nieuwe KODAK kunnen worden; geen producten en diensten zonder infrastructurele technologie. Wil de echte bank opstaan.

Jan de Kroon

 

 

Jan de Kroon

Owner & Managing partner of Improfin Groep

 

Blockchain: Playing in the sandbox

| 13-09-2016 | Carlo de Meijer |

blockchainA new – but important – chapter can be added to the blockchain story. The World Federation of Exchanges , the WFE, recently urgently called for the creation of regulatory sandboxes for distributed ledger technology. This should help industry efforts “to explore and understand the impact of blockchain-based services in the capital markets”. The Federation added that regulatory bodies should collaborate with the industry on new developments to minimise unintended consequences.

Regulators enter the stage

This is a very important signal to the regulators that they should take this technology serious and needed to enter the blockchain stage in order the give regulatory clarity. Innovations like blockchain should be primaly industry driven, and “not be unnecessarily impeded by regulatory intervention”, said the WFE. (see also my Blog: “Blockchain and regulation: do not stifle ….”, published 4 April).
Collaboration with the industry will allow regulators to understand the technology, how the future infrastructure will look like and what the impact will be on the financial markets. But above all how they could most effectively perform their regulatory tasks. With the insight and knowledge obtained, regulators will be better placed on the changes necessary to evolve the regulatory environment to not only better regulate these businesses, but also continue to ensure that the legislation does not frustrate this innovation.

Regulatory sandboxes

Regulatory sandboxes have proven to be a useful tool for the wider fintech industry in various jurisdictions. “Promising innovations may be stifled and opportunities missed as firms may be unclear on whether a new product or service complies with legal and regulatory requirements, and consequently may choose not to pursue their new product or service further”.

That is where the ‘regulatory sandbox’ comes in. They have been formed to provide a safe environment for businesses to test their innovative products. These sandbox allow firms to experiment with fintech while providing the appropriate safeguards to contain the consequences of failure for the customers.

New entrants to the financial services market, can use the sandbox to test products, services, business models and delivery without first needing to meet all of the normal regulatory requirements and incurring the considerable costs of putting in place the complex structures and processes to successfully apply for regulatory authorisation.

This should allow appropriate collaboration and exchange of information between industry and regulators.

Regulatory sandboxes: an overview

Since this year these regulatory sandboxes have been extended to distributed ledger technology in a number of countries including UK, Hong Kong, Singapore, Australia and Abu Dhabi. And now also other regulators are thinking about introducing such a testing environment.

  • Regulatory Sandbox Open for Play in the UK

The UK regulator FCA launched a regulatory sandbox early May this year. This is a next step for the FCA, the Financial Conduct Authority as part of Project Innovate, which aims to boost competition and growth in financial services. Goal is to help banks and other financial service providers reduce the time it takes to bring innovative ideas to the market.

The FCA’s sandbox will allow business to test disruptive technologies including distributed ledgers in a live environment “without immediately incurring all of the normal regulatory consequences”. The FCA however said that consumer protection will be a significant focus, and will be considering appropriate consumer safeguards.

Application

Fin-techs could apply to the UK’s regulatory sandbox from 9 May till 8 July. The second ‘cohort’ will have an application deadline of mid-January 2017.this year

The FCA uses an inclusive approach to defining potential users. That means anyone from a start-up to a multinational can benefit from the sandbox. For authorised users and suppliers, the FCA has identified  three key tools to businesses on a case-by-case basis (individual guidance; waivers; and, no enforcement letters). Unauthorised business will use the sandbox predominantly to facilitate testing without the need for full authorisation from the FCA.

Accessing the FCA sandbox is however not straightforward. A firm must meet a number of key eligibility criteria including: be in an in-scope business; demonstrate a genuine innovation; deliver a consumer benefit; demonstrate a need for the sandbox; and, be ready for testing. It should also be noted that the sandbox will not be available for activities which fall outside of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. For example, payment service providers and e-money issuers already potentially benefit from the lighter touch regimes in the PSRs and the Electronic Money Regulations.

  • Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) plans to create a regulatory sandbox

HKMA last week announced plans to create a regulatory sandbox, where start-ups and banks can test solutions and express their ideas before applying for authorisation. The sandbox allows banks to conduct tastings and trials of newly developed technology such as blockchain on a pilot basis. Within the sandbox, banks can try out their new fintech products without the need to achieve full compliance with the HKMA’s usual supervisory requirements.
In a related initiative, the HKMA has set up a ‘fintech facilitation office’ with its own dedicated e-mail account to act as a platform for the exchange of ideas between the regulatory body and banks and tech firms. Industry players, such as banks, payment service providers, fintech start-ups, the HKMA, etc. can get together at this facility to brainstorm innovative ideas, try out and evaluate new fintech solutions, conduct proof-of-concept trials, and gain an early understanding of the general applicability of creative solutions for banking and payment services.

  • ASIC released consultation paper on regulatory sandbox

Also Australia plans a regulatory sandbox for fin-techs technology innovations including blockchain. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) released a consultation paper on this issue, detailing proposals for a testing ground for innovative robo-advice providers and other similar services.  It also highlighted ASIC’s views about some regulatory options already open to fin-techs under the current law.

The sandbox will allow new entrants to test a service for up to 100 retail clients for up to 6 months without holding an AFSL. The service can only relate to advice and “arranging” for dealing, catering primarily to robo-advisers.  Product issuers such as payment facility providers and marketplace lenders are excluded, as is advice about general and life insurance. Start-ups will not need to apply to ASIC to be admitted to the sandbox (unlike comparable sandbox arrangements in other jurisdictions), but may need to be vetted by a “sponsor”, such as a hub, co-working space or venture capital firm.

A final regulatory position is expected by December.

  • MAS proposes regulatory sandbox for fintech

Early June, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) released a consultation paper detailing guidelines for a ‘regulatory sandbox’. With this sandbox approach the MAS hopes to encourage and help firms experiment with innovative solutions to support their development, and bring fintech solutions to the mainstream.

Any interested firm can adopt a sandbox to experiment within a well-defined space and duration; the MAS will provide the appropriate regulatory support and will relax certain legal and regulatory requirements. This sandbox will however have to meet certain evaluation criteria (technologically innovative; benefit consumers and address a significant problem or issue; intention and ability to deploy the solution in Singapore on a larger scale; report to the MAS on the test progress; major foreseeable risks have to be assessed and mitigated; etc.).

In April, the country expressed its desire to become the leading hub in Asia for blockchain-technology and fin-tech start-ups. MAS aims to provide a responsive and forward-looking regulatory approach that will enable promising fin-tech solutions to develop and flourish. The sandbox will help reduce regulatory friction and provide a safer environment for fin-tech experiments.

  • Abu Dhabi FSRA seek blockchain start-ups for fintech sandbox

The Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA), the independent regulatory authority of Abu Dhabi’s newest financial free zone, has released a consultation paper in which it detailed its plans to create a sandbox environment for fin-tech under which start-ups would be allowed to work under a flexible regulatory framework for up to two years. The FSRA is seeking to promote the development of blockchain start-ups as part of a drive to create new efficiencies in the regional financial sector.

The FSRA’s proposal would seek to limit start-ups accepted into the program to those that “promote significant growth, efficiency or competition in the financial sector”. To give some clarity where they are focusing on the paper goes on to cite examples of technologies that fit this description.

“The advent of robo-advisers that offer lower costs, simplicity and real-time portfolio analytics and monitoring; or leveraging on the application of blockchain technology and distributed databases to facilitate price discovery, smart contracts, settlement of financial transactions, etc that may lead to safer [and] better products, and higher productivity and growth.”

Benefits for startups

The benefits of these regulatory sandbox are manifold. Both start-ups, the whole industry and regulators may profit.

There ought to be clear benefits :

  • First of all from a time and cost point of view.

Most immediately, the ability of businesses to safely test their products and also be engaged in direct dialogue with the regulator without first having to expend time and money on a speculative application for regulatory authorisation should relieve start-ups of high costs they often cannot afford.

  • From a compliance point if view

At the same time, the businesses can adapt their offerings to better ensure regulatory compliance.

  • From an investor point of view

Once through the process, and assuming the road-testing has produced a successful outcome for the business, the task of attracting investors should be simpler as a major unknown will have been removed.

  • From a financial industry point of view

The regulatory sandbox may help to foster innovation in financial services and that is good for the whole industry and their customers.

  • From a regulatory point of view

With the insight and knowledge obtained from that role, the regulator will be better placed to assess the changes necessary to evolve the regulatory environment to not only better regulate these businesses, but also continue to ensure that the legislation does not frustrate the competition that the FCA wishes to promote.

Global regulatory collaboration

Given its global reach, the level of complexity and the interconnectedness of financial markets, and the level of complexity and the interconnectedness of financial markets, regulatory bodies worldwide should collaborate to ensure that no different regulatory environments are created and regulatory arbitrage is excluded. National and foreign regulators must coordinate to create a common principles-based approach for blockchain oversight A special role should be given to bodies like the IOSCO and the G-20 Financial Stability Board.

 

carlodemeijer

 

Carlo de Meijer

Economist and researcher

 

Uitgelicht: Fintech – Investeringen in financiële innovatie fors toegenomen.

| 23-06-2016 | Rob Bekker, Simon Knappstein |


fintechnology

Vorige week lazen we dat de investeringen in financiële innovatie fors zijn toegenomen. In de eerste drie maanden van dit jaar werd er $4,9 miljard geïnvesteerd in Fintech’s.(bron: fd.nl) Ook de Autoriteit Consument en Markt (ACM) maakte bekend Fintech bedrijven zo goed mogelijk te willen ondersteunen om te innoveren. (bron: fd.nl).  Wat betekent dit voor de toekomst? Wij vroegen experts Rob Bekker en Simon Knappstein om een reactie:



 

robbekkerrond

Rob Bekker – Owner of Bekker Consultancy Nigtevecht

De versnellende technologische veranderingen en nieuwe mogelijkheden/platforms dwingen financiële partijen hun business modellen drastisch te herzien en stellen nieuwe partijen in staat te profiteren van de wet van de remmende voorsprong. Tegelijkertijd dient het hoofd te worden geboden aan de strengere regelgeving, wat aardig wat kruim kost voor de traditionele financiële partijen. Oplossingen worden gezocht en gevonden aan de FinTech kant.



 

simonknappsteinrondSimon Knappstein – Owner of FX Prospect

Fintech mag zich in een toenemende populariteit onder beleggers verheugen. Het is nog niet zoals in de Dotcom hype, maar het aantal investeringen neemt mondiaal aanzienlijk toe. En net zoals in de Dotcom tijd zullen een aantal van de start-ups het tot spelers van formaat schoppen. De grote vraag voor mij is of de banken in staat zullen zijn hun bedrijfsmodellen snel genoeg aan te passen om deze concurrentie het hoofd te bieden en te overleven. Waarschijnlijk wel, maar ik vermoed dat er nog wel wat bloed zal gaan vloeien.