BCR Publishing
We are the leading provider of news, market intelligence, events and training for the global receivables finance industry.
Working with industry leading organisations, experts, governments and universities, BCR Publications delivers expertise in factoring, receivables and supply chain finance to a global audience.
BCR has long been a beacon of innovation and excellence in the realm of receivables finance, playing an instrumental role in shaping the industry’s international landscape. Through its comprehensive conferences, insightful publications, and thought leadership, BCR has facilitated crucial dialogues and connections among industry professionals, driving forward the development of receivables finance globally.
Follow BCR Publishing
Free passes
For corporate treasurer roles/functions!



What is the expected conclusion of crypto volatility for Corporate Treasury?
08-06-2022 | treasuryXL | LinkedIn |
A couple of weeks ago we launched a poll on our LinkedIn page about the impact of crypto volatility on corporate treasury. The poll received 72 votes in total, which is a great number! Thanks to everyone who joined the poll.
We thank François de Witte, Pieter de Kiewit and Carlo de Meijer for sharing their views with us.
What is the expected conclusion of crypto volatility for Corporate Treasury?
The votes which were given by Treasurers
View of treasuryXL experts
Francois De Witte
It is quite clear that cryptos present a high-risk profile. The volatility is high, and it is not easy to hedge these risks. In addition, payment transactions in cryptos take more time and energy than existing payments systems like the instant payments.
Currently, cryptos are held within the blockchain and are based upon a consensus. As a corporate, you do not have a control over these assets. In addition, you do not have the stringent KYC and AML checks which you have in the classic payment systems. The KYC and AML controls occur only on the moment that an individual or a company buys cryptocurrencies with its bank account or card, or when the proceeds of the sales of cryptocurrencies are paid to their bank account.
For this reason, there is a clear need for more regulation. Although the 5th AML Directive covers certain crypto assets under the term “virtual currencies”, it does not provide a harmonized approach. This problem will be addressed by the proposal of the EU Commission for the Regulation of Markets in Crypto Assets (abbreviated as MiCAR), which aims to create an EU framework for crypto assets falling outside the scope of other existing EU financial regulation and is expected to enter into force by end 2024. Let’s hope that this will bring more clarity in this complex topic.
Pieter de Kiewit
Rejecting crypto currencies or even blockchain before fully understanding the concept is like holding on tohorse and wagon when seeing the first cars. And current inflation following the QE strategy of the ECB shows that stability is not guaranteed in the traditional system. At the same time, treasurers are there to manage risk and the current crypto landscape seems very risky. So let’s see what will happen.
Carlo de Meijer
Regulation of stablecoins has long been on the agenda of regulators worldwide. To date, however, the crypto sector in general and the stablecoin segment in particular remain largely unregulated.
Stablecoins continue to come under scrutiny from regulators, given the rapid growth of the $130 billion market and its potential to impact the broader financial system. As stablecoins are deemed increasingly important to the system by regulators, with the potential to disrupt payment and settlement transactions.
The recent collapse of stablecoin TerraUSD (UST) and the resulting fall of Bitcoin below the $28.000 level have provided an additional argument for speeding up the regulatory process and coming up with adequate regulatory measures.
With a growing number of traditional financial institutions, investors and also companies entering the Crypto and DeFi market, regulation becomes urgent to prevent such collapses in the future. Buyers need to understand the risks of these algorithmically stablecoins in particular. Therefore, standards are needed.
Without well thought-out regulation, the inherent volatility of cryptocurrencies in general but also of some types of stablecoins, will continue to make these stablecoins vulnerable to various risks, and make using these instruments for treasury purposes a difficult activity. The lack of transparency about what assets are being used and whether they have enough dollars to support all the digital coins in circulation also amplifies this consequence.
Closing Loops: Connecting FX Hedging and Cash Forecasts
08-06-2022 | treasuryXL | Cashforce | LinkedIn |
From forecasts to forex. The member said this is only possible because Cashforce can forecast at a high level of granularity. The AT said she was “really lucky” that the tools work together so well.
A closed loop. Nicolas Christiaen, Cashforce’s CEO, said that, before this project, the member’s process was “very disconnected,” but all it took was connecting the dots.
A step further. With the proposed system that the member has designed with Citi, the company could include its hedging policies as a rules-based program in CitiFX Pulse that can read this forecast.
Constant change. Automation is “an awful lot to bite off,” the member said, and recommends starting slow on this kind of process:
Article originally published by Neugroup here.
Option Tales : Cheap Options part IIII
| 07-06-2016 | Rob Söentken |
Today in the closing part of Rob Söentken’s Option Tales: When buying options it is tempting to see if the premium expenses can be minimized. A number of solutions are possible, which I’ve discussed in four articles. You can read about choosing the average rate option (ARO) and the conditional premium option in my previous article. In this closing part I will discuss the Reverse Knock Out (RKO) option.
Reverse Knock Out (RKO) option
One of the most common options used as alternative to a vanilla option is the Reverse Knock out option. It is a vanilla option which ceases to exist after the underlying reference rate has traded through a certain level, the ‘trigger’ or ‘KnockOut’. This trigger event determination can be either
The term ‘Reverse’ means that the option has been ITM before the trigger was hit. Just when the option was starting to make money it ceases to exist after the market touches the trigger. Unlike a vanilla option the value of an RKO is capped by a potential trigger event. Therefor RKOs are a usually a lot cheaper than vanilla options which have unlimited value potential.
In diagram 6 an example is given of a 12-months USD call option costing 1.5%. Alternatively, one could consider buying an RKO option with same tenor and strike, with a European Knock Out trigger at 12.4% OTM. This costs 0.9%. There is only 8% chance the market is below the trigger at maturity. (The Delta of a vanilla option is 8%, which is also the chance of being below the strike at maturity). Therefor there is only 8% chance that the RKO expires worthless. Which could be a dramatic result for a hedge, especially considering the USD has appreciated by more than 12.4%, making the actual hedging cost showing a big loss. For a premium saving of only 0.6%.
So, to minimize premium expenses when buying options there are seven solutions to think about:
1. Choose Out of The Money strike (OTM)
2. Choose Shorter Tenor
3. Choose Longer Tenor
4. Compound Option
5. Average Rate Option (ARO)
6. Conditional Premium Option
7. Reverse Knock Out option (RKO)
Rob Söentken
Ex-derivatives trader