PSD 2: a lot of opportunities but also big challenges (Part I)

| 26-1-2017 | François de Witte |

The Directive 2015/2366 on payment services in the internal market (hereinafter PSD2) was adopted by the European Parliament on October 8, 2015, and by the European Union (EU) Council of Ministers on November 16, 2015. The PSD2 updates the first EU Payment Services Directive published in 2007 (PSD1), which laid the legal foundation for the creation of an EU-wide single market for payments. PSD2 came into force on January 13, 2016, and is applicable from January 13, 2018 onwards.

By that date the member states must have adopted and published the measures necessary to implement it into their national law.

PSD 2

PSD2 will cause important changes in the market and requires a thorough preparation. In this article, we are summarizing the measures and highlighting the impact on the market participants. In today’s Part I we will focus on abbreviations and main measurers introduced by PSD2.

List of abbreviations used in this article

2FA    : Two-factor authentication

AISP  :  Account Information Service Provider

API : Application Programming Interface

ASPSP : Account Servicing Payment Service Provider

EBA :  European Banking Authority

EBF :  European Banking Federation

EEA :  European Economic Area

PISP :  Payment Initiation Service Provider

PSD1:  Payment Services Directive 2007/64/EC

PSD2  :  Revised Payment Services Directive (EU) 2015/2366

PSP : Payment Service Provider

PSU:   Payment Service User

RTS : Regulatory Technical Standards (to be issued by the EBA)

SCA : Strong Customer Authentication

TPP :  Third Party Provider

Main Measures introduced by PSD2:

The  PSD2 expands the reach of PSD1, to the following payments:

  • Payments in all currencies (beyond EU/EEA), provided that the two PSP (Payment Service Provider) are located in the EU /EEA (two legs)
  • Payments where at least one PSP (and not both anymore)  is located within EU borders for the part of the payment transaction carried out in the EU/EEA (one leg transactions)

A second important measure is the creation of the Third Party Providers (TPP). One of the main aims of the PSD2 is to encourage new players to enter the payment market and to provide their services to the PSU (Payment Service Users). To this end, it creates the obligation for the ASPSP (Account Servicing Payment Service Provider – mainly the banks) to “open up the bank account” to external parties, the so-called, third-party account access. These TPP (Third Party Providers) are divided in two types:

·        AISP (Account Information Service Provider) : In order to be authorized, an AISP is required to hold professional indemnity insurance and be registered by their member state and by the EBA. There is no requirement for any initial capital or own funds. The EBA (European Banking Authority) will publish guidelines on conditions to be included in the indemnity insurance (e.g. the minimum sum to be insured), although it is as yet unknown what further conditions insurers will impose.

·        PISP (Payment Initiation Service Providers): PISPs are players that can initiate payment transactions. This is an important change, as currently there are not many payment options that can take money from one’s account and send them elsewhere. The minimum requirements for authorization as a PISP are significantly higher. In addition to being registered, a PISP must also be licensed by the competent authority, and it must have an initial and on-going minimum capital of EUR 50,000.

Banks will have to implement interfaces, so they can interact with the AISPs and PISPs. However, payment initiation service providers will only be able to receive information from the payer’s bank on the availability of the funds on the account which results in a simple yes or no answer before initiating the payment, with the explicit consent of the payer. Account information service providers will only receive the information explicitly consented by the payer and only to the extent the information is necessary for the service provided to the payer. This compliance with PSD2 is mandatory and all banks will have to make changes to their infrastructure deployments.

Source: PA Perspectives on Nordic Financial Services
http://www.paconsulting.com/our-thinking/perspectives-on-nordic-financial-services.

A third important change is the obligation for the Payment Service Providers to place the SCA (Strong Customer Authentication) for electronic payment transactions based in at least 2 different sources (2FA: Two-factor authentication) :

  • Something which only the client knows (e.g. password)
  • A device (e.g. card reader, authentication code generating device, token)
  • Inherence (e.g. fingerprint or voice recognition)

 

The EBA (European Banking Authority will provide further guidance on this notion in a later stage. It remains to be seen whether the current bank card with pin code is sufficient to qualify as “strong customer authentication”. This “strong customer authentication” needs to take place with every payment transaction. EBA will also be able to provide exemptions based on the risk/amount/recurrence/payment channel involved in the payment service (e.g. for paying the toll on the motorway or the parking).

PSD2 also introduces some other measures:

  • Retailers will be authorized to ask to the consumers for permission to use their contact details, so as to receive the payment directly from the bank without intermediaries
  • There will be a ban on surcharges on card payments
  • There will be new limitations on the customer liability for unauthorized payment transactions

In a second article soon to be published on treasuryXL, François de Witte will focus on the impact PSD2 has on market participants. 

François de Witte – Senior Consultant at FDW Consult

[button url=”https://www.treasuryxl.com/community/experts/francois-de-witte/” text=”View expert profile” size=”small” type=”primary” icon=”” external=”1″]

[separator type=”” size=”” icon=””]

Working Capital Management – not just a finance issue

|14-12-2016 | François de Witte |

money-iii

 

When looking at the sales, conversion and procurement cycle, we should not only focus on the stated DSO, but also at the hidden DSO. In order to identify this, we must go much further to a complete analysis of the order to cash cycle, as illustrated by the following  6 examples:

 

 

  • Several companies do not manage their inventory efficiently
  • Quite a lot of companies still have a time lag between the moment that the goods and the services are delivered, and the moment that the invoice is issued
  • Several  companies still issue paper based invoices. The postal delay will also increase the collection time. For this reason, I recommend to my clients to move to e-invoicing
  • When I worked with a car dealer, I realised that between the moment that the cars were delivered by the importer, and the moment that they were sold, there was a huge time lag
  • A marketing company struggled with the process of offers, leading to purchase orders, because the various participating units did not provide their time sheet and cost estimation in time.
  • On the inventory side, purchase of spare parts were done, even without having a duly executed purchase order of the client, and clients were not reminded in time to take delivery of the goods, resulting in higher stocks

Hence, when starting an assignment on the working capital management optimisation, one should not only look at the processes within finance, but at the overall processes.in the company. By analysing the detailed processes on the floor, you can better understand the drivers of the cash conversion cycle, and take some actions, such as:

  • Ensuring that procurement only purchase spare parts when they have a duly executed purchase order, with then required the advance payment
  • Making staff aware of the need to ensure a quick invoicing process
  • Understanding the possible resistance to new concepts such as e-invoicing and automated incoming document scanning
  • Identifying the triggers, which will make that the staff cooperates to reduce the order to cash cycle
  • Having a better alignment between the finance staff and the sales department on e.g. the credit risk and the payment terms
  • Make procurement more sensitive to treasury aspects. I have seen several cash risk companies who left aside the possibility of supply chain financing of discounting schemes, because the KPIs of both procurement and treasury were not aligned;

But overall, if you wish to succeed in optimising the cash conversion cycle, you need to ensure that the changes are embedded in the organisation by:

  • Explaining to all the participants the importance of working capital management and their contribution to it
  • Providing to the various participants KPIs in this area, which are monitored on a regular basis. In my recent assignment, we have put joint KPIs for the Sales Administration in prompt invoicing and in DSO terms
  • Ensuring also that there is an internal control on the procedures
  • Ensure that you have the correct tooling (e.g. e-invoicing, credit management, credit collection, etc.)
  • Having a regular review of the processes

We can conclude that an efficient working capital management is a matter for the whole company. Beside hard skills, you also need soft skills and KPIs to ensure that the processes are really embedded in the organisation.

francois-de-witte

 

François de Witte

Senior Consultant at FDW Consult