BCR Publishing
We are the leading provider of news, market intelligence, events and training for the global receivables finance industry.
Working with industry leading organisations, experts, governments and universities, BCR Publications delivers expertise in factoring, receivables and supply chain finance to a global audience.
BCR has long been a beacon of innovation and excellence in the realm of receivables finance, playing an instrumental role in shaping the industry’s international landscape. Through its comprehensive conferences, insightful publications, and thought leadership, BCR has facilitated crucial dialogues and connections among industry professionals, driving forward the development of receivables finance globally.
Follow BCR Publishing
Free passes
For corporate treasurer roles/functions!
What should you know about SWIFT system transfers?
09-12-2021 | Xe | treasuryXL | LinkedIn |
The SWIFT network is well-known and used by banks around the world, but it may not be the best channel for you to send your money transfers through.
The Society for Worldwide InterbankFinancial Telecommunication (SWIFT) network, which was founded in Belgium in 1973, handles about half of the world’s cross-border fund transfers. As international commerce has grown, the SWIFT network has grown commensurately. It handled about 2.5 million daily transactions in 1995 and more than ten times that many in 2015.
But SWIFT is not a bank. It does not even touch the money which passes along its network. Instead, SWIFT sends payment orders to correspondent accounts at member banks. As such, SWIFT is strictly a bank-to-bank transfer service.
If you’re sending a money transfer with a bank, you’ll become acquainted with the SWIFT system. But is it the best channel to send your money through? We’re not so sure.
What does the SWIFT system mean for you and your money transfers?
Added fees. In order to be members and transfer through the SWIFT system, banks are charged SWIFT fees. To counter this, both the recipient and the correspondent bank usually add fees to SWIFT transfers. Somebody, either the sender or the recipient or a combination of both, must pay them.
Bad exchange rates. There are some hidden currency transfer costs, at least in most cases. Currency exchange rates vary in different markets and at different times. Banks routinely choose the worst possible currency exchange rate. Then, they quickly move the money to another marketplace and pocket the difference.
Long transfer times. As mentioned above, SWIFT completes “most” of its transactions within thirty minutes. In this case, “most” means about half. Some transactions could take several days to process. Other delays, such as large transfer amounts or first-time users, could delay the process even more.
How does the SWIFT network work?
Today, SWIFT connects about 10,000 financial institutions in about 200 countries. That sounds sweeping and impressive. But most of its transfers go through fewer than two hundred banks, brokers, clearinghouses, and corporations.
Furthermore, SWIFT is the industry standard for linguistics and code, even for non-SWIFT institutions like Xe. SWIFT works with various international organizations to set content and format standards for messages and transactions. In other words, the network infrastructure usually handles codes as opposed to account numbers and other sensitive information. That’s one reason SWIFT is so secure.
Another reason the network is secure is that its three data centers in the United States, Switzerland, and the Netherlands communicate with each other via subterranean or submerged cables. These communications channels are difficult to hack.
SWIFT upgraded its network infrastructure in 2001 and again in 2008. Not coincidentally, 2008 was also the year international funds transfer prices went up significantly. As part of the upgrade, SWIFT required all member institutions to replace their bilateral key exchange encryption hardware with a Relationship Management Application. Member banks gladly passed these costs along to consumers.
How secure is the SWIFT system?
2008 was a long time ago in technological terms. The smartphone you had back then, assuming you had one, probably looked like one of those World War I field telephones compared to the one you have now. Yet 2008 was also the last time SWIFT did any major security upgrades.
The network paid the price in April 2016. Hackers used malware to steal about $81 million from the central bank in Bangladesh. The malware intercepted the supposedly unbreakable SWIFT codes and also covered the hacker’s tracks. Perhaps most disturbingly, SWIFT admitted that these thieves, or ones similarly equipped, had tried this before.
A few months later, an Ecuadorian bank sued Wells Fargo after the latter allegedly honored a $12 million fraudulent transfer. Hackers obtained canceled transaction requests, altered the amounts, and submitted them.
Questions continue about the network’s security. Some banks claimed they have lost money to hackers in much the same way. These allegations are under investigation.
Can you make money transfers without using the SWIFT system?
Yes, you can! Many banks and providers utilize the SWIFT system to send their money transfers due to its security, efficiency, and well-established reputation, but some providers instead opt to use other channels (or even create their own channels) to send money transfers.
Do you want an example of one such provider? Well, now that you mention it…
Sending money with Xe
SWIFT might be the largest international funds transfer platform in the world. But in terms of security, efficiency, privacy, and a few other areas, it falls short.
So, if you need a reliable and affordable way to send money overseas to family or friends, give Xe a try. We send money through our own money transfer channels, which means that we aren’t on the hook for additional SWIFT system fees and delays—and neither are you.
But don’t worry: our channels are still completely secure. We adhere to regulatory standards in every country that we do business in, with bank-grade security measures to ensure that your money and information are completely safe
What is holding back blockchain adoption and what should be done?
08-12-2021 | Carlo de Meijer | treasuryXL | LinkedIn
Early this year I wrote a blog about the existing technology challenges that were holding back a more massive adoption of blockchain technology and of possible solutions that may tackle these. Though blockchain has many advantages this technology still has a lot of growing pains to go through before it could unlock its full potential.
So I was wondering where we are now. Gartner showed several times, any new technology – and that is blockchain too – has to go through various stages.
“According to recent surveys, almost 90% of blockchain-based projects still failed.”
And that is not strange. For new technologies, it takes a lot of time to get rid of all the challenges and use it to power the modern world. And these challenges are not only technical. What is the way forward?
Challenges
Blockchain technology has been surrounded by plenty of hypes, which makes many business leaders keenly interested in adopting it. Blockchain however faces different blockchain adoption challenges that make them reluctant. These are not only related to technological inefficiencies, but also to the lack of regulation and limited knowledge/awareness. Most of these challenges still need to be addressed and overcome in order for the technology to reach omnipresence and make blockchain a more acceptable technology for all.
Technological challenges
Although blockchain technology has a lot of benefits, it still has a number of shortcomings in technological ways, that are preventing a much higher adoption. Bitcoin but also other blockchains are well known for their inefficient technological design, leading to low scalability, lack of speed of the network, high energy consumption and as a result high costs of transactions. Besides, there is a lack of standardisation and interoperability, limiting the chance for different blockchains to communicate with each other. Ethereum tried to cover up a number of these defects, but it is still not enough.
Low scalability
First of all there is the scalability issue. Their limited capacity to scale in order to handle large transaction volumes. This so-called ‘scalability trilemma’ is the main reason why many doubt that blockchain systems would ever be capable of operating at scale. It essentially revolves around the difficulties current blockchain platforms experience when trying to find the right balance between scalability, decentralization and security. In reality, blockchains work fine for a small number of users. But what happens when a mass integration will take place? Ethereum and Bitcoin nowadays have the highest number of users on the network, but they are having a hard time dealing with the situation.
Lack of speed
Another important challenge that should be addressed is the need to increase the processing speeds. When the number of users increases, the network tends to slow down taking more time to process any transactions. This may result in huge transaction fees, making the technology less and less attractive. Also, the encryption of the system could make it even slower. Completing a transaction can take up to several hours or sometimes even days. It is thus most suited for making large transactions where time is not a vital element. This blockchain adoption challenge can become a hurdle soon.
High energy consumption
High energy consumption is a blockchain adoption challenge, especially now with the worldwide climate discussion. Most of the blockchain technologies follow Bitcoins infrastructure and use Proof of Work (PoW) as a consensus algorithm, thereby needing massive computational power, which is very energy-intensive.
This not only limits the opportunities for ordinary people to join PoW networks and hinders decentralization by encouraging the formation of large mining pools, but it also raises environmental concerns. At present, miners are using 0.2% of the total electricity. If it keeps increasing, then miners will take more power than the world can provide. Many organizations are trying to avoid blockchain altogether just for this challenge.
Lack of standardization
A fourth issue that is limiting a more massive blockchain adoption is the lack of standardization. Standards are required for any technology to have a scalable adoption across the globe. All networks which will be using blockchain technology need to speak the same language in order to be understood and to complete the transaction. All new technologies however suffer from this at the beginning till the standards slowly build up from experience.
Lack of interoperability
As more organizations begin adopting blockchain, there is a tendency for many to develop their own systems with varying characteristics (governance rules, blockchain technology versions, consensus models, etc.). These separate blockchains mostly do not work together, and there is currently no universal standard to enable different networks to communicate with each other. Blockchain interoperability includes the ability to share, see and access information across different blockchain networks without the need for an intermediary or central authority. This lack of interoperability can make mass adoption an almost impossible task.
Regulatory challenges
Next to these technological challenges, another big obstacle to blockchain adoption is the lack of regulatory clarity. Existing regulatory regimes are unable to keep up with the rapid development happening in blockchain and crypto. There aren’t any specific regulations about it. So, no one follows any specific rules when it comes to the blockchain.
Initial coin offerings, stablecoins and DeFi protocols have in recent years demonstrated the limitations of current rules and regulations when it comes to handling the sector. There are various challenges caused by this lack of regulation, including criminal activities, lack of privacy, and, although blockchain guarantees visibility as one of its benefits, there is still no security.
Criminal connection/activities
There is the anonymous feature of the blockchain technology that may become a great threat. The nature of the blockchain network is decentralized so that no one can know your true identity. Being anonymous is however quite convenient for illegal transactions. This has attracted criminals leading to various cybercrimes/illegal transactions such as crypto exchange hacks, scam projects, market manipulation asking cryptos in exchange as a ransom or using Bitcoin as a currency in the black market and on the dark web.
Lack of privacy
Privacy is another challenge as far as the blockchain is concerned. One of the greatest strengths of blockchain technology, public blockchain networks in particular, is the transparency that comes from having a record of a network’s transaction history that is public and easy to verify. This is however not always seen as a positive, as it also poses threat to privacy of organisations or the public using it. Many companies that work with privacy need to have defined boundaries. Enterprises, which want to protect their trade secrets and other sensitive information, are therefore reluctant to embrace some of the most prominent blockchain protocols.
Security and trust problems
Security is another crucial topic here that may limit blockchain adoption. Every blockchain technology talks about its security as the main advantage. But like any other technology, blockchain also comes with a number of security risks including coding flaws or loopholes. Ethereum allows developers to implement dApps based on their system. And there have been many dApps based on them. However, most of them seem to have a matter of false coding and loopholes. Users can utilize these loopholes and hack into the system quickly. The resulting lack of trust among blockchain users is another major obstacle to widespread implementation.
Educational challenges
Blockchain is still very much an emerging technology, and the skills needed to develop and use it are scarce, while the lack of awareness amongst the large public are challenging the adoption of this technology.
Lack of Adequate Skill Sets
This skills gap is a top challenge. The marketplace for blockchain skills and qualified people to manage blockchain technology is highly competitive. The demand for this qualified staff is enormous but few people have the adequate skills to support such technology, so one has to pay up high salaries.
The expense and difficulty of talent acquisition in this area only adds to the concerns that organizations have about adopting blockchain and integrating it with legacy systems.
Lack of awareness
Though broader awareness of the technology is growing, the majority of organizations are still in the early stages of adoption. Only 12% of participants in a recent survey reported that they are live with either blockchain or blockchain as a service, while 34% of respondents are not even exploring the use of it. But also the majority of the public is still not aware of the existence and potential use of blockchain, while there is lack of proper marketing of this technology.
Blockchain = Bitcoin?
Blockchain is an emerging technology and the distributed ledger technology (DLT) space is still relatively young. And with crypto price volatility dominating the headlines of mainstream media, it is not surprising that the immense utility the technology has is not well understood by the public. Currently, blockchain technology is almost the same meaning as Bitcoin and remains associated with the dark transactions of money laundering, black trade, and other illegal activities. Before a general adoption is possible, the large public must understand the difference between Bitcoins, other cryptocurrencies, and blockchain.
Ways to accelerate blockchain adoption
As I described in my earlier blog, there are a number of ways to solve the various challenges. Challenges such as inefficient technological design, lack of scalability, low speed, lack of standards and interoperability as well as high energy consumption should be tackled by technology innovations.
The privacy, trust and security issues ask for proper regulation without endangering technology innovations. Lack of skills and poor public perception and awareness should be increased by education and broad information and communication.
Technological improvements
The list of blockchain adoption challenges clearly underlines the need for technological improvements. The sector needs to find ways to address the biggest challenges it is currently facing. In my blog of 28 February 2021 “Blockchain Technology Challenges: new third-generation Solutions” I already explained the various solutions in a more detailed way. So, I am not going to repeat that.
The good news is that, as we saw above, the blockchain community is actively working on solving these technological challenges such as speed and power consumption thereby using improved technology.
Refining consensus algorithms
Proof of Work (PoW) has played a crucial role in bringing the blockchain revolution to the world, but its drawbacks in important areas such as scalability, speed and energy consumption suggest that PoW can no longer support the further growth and evolution of blockchain. Blockchain can utilize other more refined consensus methods to validate the transitions. This has forced Ethereum to start a transition to a Proof of Stake (PoS) consensus algorithm that requires fewer energy to process.
Layer 2 solutions
The scalability problem can also be tackled by building so-called Layer 2 or off-chain scaling solutions that refer to approaches that allow transactions to be executed, taking some of the load of the main chain, without overcharging the blockchain. There are a number of interesting off-chain solutions ranging from state channels, accelerated chips, side chains to sharding.
State channels
State channels refer to the process in which users transact with one another directly outside of the blockchain, or ‘off-chain,’ and greatly minimize their use of ‘on-chain’ operations, while accelerated chips could be used to speed up confirmation and transaction time.
Sidechains
Another tool to speed up scalability are so-called side chains. These are aimed to reduce the load on a given blockchain by sending transactions via these connected side chains and putting the end state of the transaction on the main blockchain.
Sharding
And there is sharding, a scaling solution of spreading out the computing and storage workload from a blockchain into single nodes. This technology divides a blockchain into many separate areas, called shards, with each shard assigned a small group of nodes to maintain, thereby limiting the transactional lode. Polkadot is one of those examples built around the idea of sharding.
Multi-layered structure
Another solution to upgrade scale is the use of multi-layered structures, which is the isolation of transaction processing and data storage. Main projects are Cardano and CPCChain.
Zero-knowledge proofs
To solve the privacy challenge several protocols have been developed as alternatives to Bitcoin’s pseudo-anonymity, such as CoinJoin and Ring Signature. An interesting tool is a zero-knowledge proof. This is a class of mathematical instruments that can be used to show that something is true without disclosing the actual data that proves it. The Baseline Protocol, for example, utilizes Zero-Knowledge proofs and other cryptographic techniques and instruments to synchronize private business processes via the Ethereum Mainnet while preserving privacy, confidentiality and data security.
Private blockchains
The privacy issues, especially for enterprises, that come with the transparent nature of public blockchains can also be avoided by using private networks such as Corda, Hyperledger and Quorum. These networks are designed to support a relatively small number of network participants with known identity, thereby providing the capability of executing private transactions between two or more participating nodes. Since participation in such networks requires permission, they are also called permissioned blockchain networks.
Private blockchain protocols can be used to create practical enterprise-grade solutions capable of connecting multiple companies or separate departments within a company. Participants would get limited access, and all sensitive information would stay private as it should. As an example, to build trust among users, TradeLens (a global logistics network created by Maersk and IBM using the IBM Blockchain Platform) uses a permissioned blockchain to offer immutability, privacy and traceability of shipping documents.
Hybrid approach
The power of private and public blockchains can also be combined to achieve optimal results. This so-called hybrid blockchain approach involves using a public blockchain to store encrypted proof for all the work that has been done on a private network thereby connecting a small number of known stakeholders.
Standards and interoperability
Over the past few years we have seen an increasing number of interoperability projects meant to bridge the gap between different blockchains. Many of them are aimed at connecting private networks to each other or to public blockchains. These systems will ultimately be more useful to business leaders than prior approaches that focused on public blockchains and cryptocurrency-related tools.
Next to the more well-known examples of cross-chain communications that are most first- or second-generation, like the Bitcoin Lightning Network, the Ethereum Raid Network and the Ripple Interledger Protocol, there is a growing number of interoperability projects that are exploring third-generation solutions, including Cosmos, Neox and Polkadot. And there is a growing number of projects teaming up in order to allow their blockchains to communicate with each other, aiming at solving the blockchain isolation problem. Main example is the Blockchain Industrial Alliance formed by ICON, AION and Wanchain.
Regulatory frameworks
The rapid evolution of blockchain technology has caught regulators around the world by surprise, leaving them scrambling to react to a rapidly growing and changing industry. Though regulators are now taking more and more steps in a growing number of countries to deal with this situation, there is still a lack of a unified approach when it comes to the regulation of the blockchain sector. This has resulted in a regulatory patchwork, with various jurisdictions across the world and sometimes even different regulatory bodies in a single region coming up with their own rules and regulations for the sector.
This problem could be countered by drawing up regulatory frameworks that afford regulatory consistency across larger regions. An example of such a framework is the European Commission’s propose Markets in Crypto Assets Regulation (MICA), which will introduce an EU-wide regime for crypto tokens. Thereby they are taking a pragmatic approach of regulating the market without harming the technology.
Raising skills quality and awareness
A closer examination of this barrier shows that it is very much connected to an underlying lack of organizational awareness, lack of adequate skills and lack of knowledge and understanding of blockchain technology. As awareness of blockchain technology becomes more widespread, the ability to effectively make a business case for their adoption, might contribute to more massive adoption.
Raising awareness
Considering that distributed ledger technologies are still largely unknown to the public, it is on the blockchain community to inform people about the technology’s design, strengths and utility. Building educational resources, holding webinars and other educational events are some of the ways that blockchain companies can utilize to raise awareness. Initiatives like Coinbase Learn are examples of how some of the world’s leading blockchain companies are working to raise awareness about blockchain technology.
Blockchain-as-a-service
And there is blockchain-as-a-service (BaaS) that has the potential to mitigate the blockchain skills barrier. The use of BaaS enables organizations to reap the benefits of blockchain, without having to invest significantly in the expensive blockchain skills. Users only need to know the basics of the technology (not the technological insides) to take advantage. They will for instance need to understand how to execute smart contracts, but they won’t need specialized knowledge about the complexities of distributed ledgers.
Forward-looking
Blockchains are ecosystems that require broad adoption to work effectively. Without widespread adoption, the effectiveness and scalability of blockchains will remain limited. As described in this blog the adoption of blockchain and DLTs depends on solving the various challenges and will require active support from governments and other public organizations. Organizations are increasingly coming together and forming collaborative blockchain working groups to address common pain points and develop solutions that can benefit everyone without revealing proprietary information. There is already a lot of applications and projects live that is working perfectly. Like any technological innovation, the blockchain will continue to evolve. Yes, there may be challenges, but they should not be seen as obstacles. So, as I have shown, all the problems with blockchain will come with solutions and opportunities. There are this good reasons to be optimistic that the adoption of blockchain will grow.
Carlo de Meijer
Economist and researcher
Source
The Blank Sheet Treasury – a Guideline answering the “How”, “When” and “Why”
07-12-2021 | Jesper Nielsen-Terp | treasuryXL | LinkedIn
During times of crisis, like the financial crisis in 2009, or the Covid-19 pandemic which still hits us, we often hear the old phrase “Cash is King”. The Treasurer and the Treasury Department are once again back in the middle of the fire by the end of the day. Influenced by the CEO or the CFO, the board of directors is overall responsible for the financial strategic target settings. The tasks and responsibilities flow however from the top management and will end up at the Treasurers’ desk. Therefore, A treasurer has to structure the initial thoughts when building or re-shaping the treasury setup.
To be prepared for the fireplace, I believe that it is crucial for the Treasurer or the Finance Department employees carrying out treasury activities, that a clear strategy is implemented and outlined. Not only a strategy for how the policies and guidelines are carried out, but a strong mandate from Top management and maybe all the way from the Board of Directors. A mandate carved in stone, so no one can be in doubt when something hits the fan.
“Do not ask what the company can do for you, but ask…”
There are a couple of questions that all back-office functions need to ask themselves on a regular basis. The answer to the questions should dictate the activities that are undertaken on any given day. First, they should ask, “Is this activity going to increase the company’s revenue?”. If the answer is no, they should move on to question number two, “Is this activity going to reduce the company’s cost base?”. Once again, if the answer is no, then they should move on to question number three, “Will this activity delight the customer?”. If the answers to all three of these questions are no, then we need to examine the activity to understand why we are conducting it.
The Blank Sheet Treasury
In order to understand why the recommendations that follow are applicable, we must decide what it is that we as a Treasury Department are trying to accomplish and why. There are certain practices in Treasury across the world that should drive our behavior. In examining these practices, one potential structure emerges; the Blank Sheet Treasury. This way we are starting with our objectives and future state in mind instead of our current state.
In my opinion, the future state should equal the Treasurer to be prepared and know how to handle future potential crises, whether it is a business-related financial crisis or a worldwide pandemic.
Coming back to the phrase “Cash is King”, when in the middle of a crisis, everything else than access to cash or cash visibility should be a next day issue for the Treasurer. Stating this should give an idea why I believe the Blank Sheet Treasury always should start within the area of Cash/Liquidity Management, which of course can come in many different flavours.
The initial process
Coming back to the statements about having a focus on future state and the mandates to get there, the initial process visualized below is a tool that the Treasurer needs in his/her toolbox. Maybe not the most innovative tool, but most likely one of the most important tools, if not the most important, when shaping, re-shaping and driving treasury.
The process map works like a Lego building instruction, where there actually is a possibility to skip or change the order, but when doing it, the result will not be what we were aiming for, or even worse than what our surroundings (stakeholders) thought we were aiming for. So if the order somehow is changed or some parts are skipped, it will be similar to an “un-finished” Lego construction. It will in some cases be functional, but there will always be some spare and important “bricks” left on the table. In the Lego context, some left bricks might not make a difference or at least not a huge difference, but in a corporate context the repairment will have a critical impact on time, costs and lost confidence from stakeholders.
The foundation for everything else
Before moving to the discussion on the Leadership mandate and afterwards on daily-life guidelines for the Treasury Department, let’s first make sure that a part of the objectives and future state is the idea that everything is to be accomplished (now or in a few years). Not only will it be a guide for the “how, when and why”, but also because top management, which gives access to the budget, want visibility and take decisions based on valid information.
As the majority of Treasurers and their departments have Cash/Liquidity Management as one of their key deliveries and as the Cash/Liquidity Management highly impacts other workflows in the Treasury Department, it is somehow the foundation for everything else and therefore a good place to start.
This figure is of course not a golden rulebook, and for some Treasury Departments priorities can come in another order. But when talking to Treasurers about their priorities and building or re-shaping their setup, the figure outlines to a great extent how they see the structures and how they want to manage the process of reaching the end line.
Best Practise and Future Workflows
Each of the circles has some underlying characteristics and is decomposed into a number of workflows. Here, the objectives for the future state and best practise will come into play.
In this recommendation, Cash Management is identified as the foundation for other workflows. Next to that, when looking into job descriptions and talking to Treasurers about their key objectives, FX Risk Management is identified to be high on the agenda. Therefore, the following graphs will assist the visualizing and guidance of Cash and FX Risk Management.
The Best Practise box has to be filled out by the company (the Treasury Department), based on their needs and very much linked to the Objective/Future State. The question asked here is; ‘’Does the Company actually know what is the best practise in each of the workflows or could there actually be multiple solutions for the Best Practise?’’
The answer for both questions will for the majority of companies be that the Treasury Department has some thoughts and ideas for what they see as Best Practise for their setup, but at the same time they will recognize that a solution for the future state and the Best Practise for this, can come in different varieties – it is not a One Size Fits All. When agreed on the Best Practise for the future state, it will then be time to start visualizing the future workflows, which will give some thoughts and ideas for what actually has to be built, changed and implemented.
One of the pitfalls to avoid here is to not look too much into what worked in the past and in addition avoid looking at single workflows (in this example Cash and FX Risk Management).
As a normal part of being a human being, there can be a significant probability to start applying what worked well in the past, because the Treasurer might have some experience or preferences from similar projects. Thus, there will be a tendency of implementing the same workflows and systems used in the past, even though they do not fit into the entire puzzle.
The entire puzzle
Likewise in our own lives, the CFO wants to see the full picture and understand the full picture, before opening up the purse and increasing capital expenditure. With this in mind and the objective of getting a budget, do not only look into the short-term and easily reachable targets but think big and layout the entire puzzle. Still continue to grab the low hanging fruits though, because they are to be grabbed in order to keep momentum.
What is the entire puzzle and how can it be shown in a simple, but the informative structure, so no one will be in doubt of the individual workflows on the journey of reaching the objectives and creating a best-in-class treasury setup.
To assist in laying out the entire puzzle, all workflows will be identified and structured by their “Value” and “Importance”. Therefore, the below chart can be the guide for where to start as well as be used in the dialogue with the CFO and other stakeholders. Once again it is important to state that the chart is not a golden rule book, but an inspiration for how to make progress on the journey.
The red box will obviously be the initial most wins and the focus areas. Even though most wins have been identified, the entire puzzle is still unfinished, because it is actually laying like a puzzle.
The box has been unpacked and the puzzle pieces have been sorted. The next step for the Treasury Department will be to make the final move and bring their game plan. A game plan is divided into a number of streams showing the how, when and why.
*Policies/Procedures are in the initial phase not a part of the Blank Sheet Treasury, but as stated above in each of the streams as it is something that needs to be in place when start implementing.
Using streams and a given timeline for each of the streams as well as combining the different areas and the workflow process identified, the Treasurer now has made a construction manual for how to implement a best practise setup for the future state.
When utilizing some or maybe all of the recommendations and figures in this article, it will be possible for the Treasury Department to start taking the dialogue with the CFO and potentially other stakeholders, who need to be involved in the process. Because when being able to identify the how, when and why, and showing the entire process and the needs, the CFO can see the entire picture. A picture that can be used when moving into the next section, where mandates will be given to the Treasurer and a budget needs to be allocated.
Additional considerations
When using a Blank Sheet Treasury setup, the probability of succeeding is higher if no planning has been made. Moreover, the Treasurer needs to consider whether or not the right resources are in place when moving into the building, crafting or re-shaping the phases. When talking about resources, it will both be human resources and resources in terms of systems.
In terms of human resources, it can be internal resources, such as treasury and/or IT people, or external resources, such as treasury consultants. Speaking about consultants, it might be worth considering. Even though it comes with a cost, advantages are gained in time and knowledge.
On the system side, the Treasurer will have to decide whether or not he/she can bring his/her plan to live with the existing system landscape, and if not, the process will have to be added with a suggestion to make changes to the current system landscape.
Thank you for reading and looking forward to your thoughts.
Jesper Nielsen-Terp
Treasury & Risk Management Expert